Friday's Child
Plus I want to see "Long Cox" on the team sheet.
by Gordons Cumming » 12 Jun 2009 13:59
Friday's Child
Plus I want to see "Long Cox" on the team sheet.
by Plymouth_Royal » 12 Jun 2009 14:21
Friday's Child Posted on another forum:
If I were Rodgers, clearly with the desire and skill to develop players, I would:
Get Cox back from Swindon, given that Rodgers could continue the good work that he started and take him to being a Premiership player - not only that, but we would get a decent deal as we could wipe out the 20-40% (whoever you believe) clause in place.
I would then get Rodgers on the phone to his best mates, Jose Mourinho at Inter Milan and the Chelsea management team - get in some players on loan and take their judgements on the market-wide buys suitable for this level. There's the scouting network. So Jack Cork, Michael Machienne, Scott Sinclair et al, then one or two Italian prodigies. Who knows.
Then an experienced centre-forward with leadership qualities, whether or not we keep Doyle (I expect not). If we lose Doyle then a young and hungry player would do well enough alongside Long and N Hunt. Cox would probably do this job fully. Plus I want to see "Long Cox" on the team sheet.
We have been linked with Lee Bowyer who has even spoken out on a move to Reading - for all his hatable attributes - would be a fantastic addition to the midfield and the sort of player that would thrive in our centre as finally a replacement for Sidwell after 2 years.
Oh, and Tommy Smith, given that it seems likely and has plenty of quality to add. Other than I would focus our energies on trimming down the squad and bringing through the youth players who all look capable of making the step up, if not to Premiership level then as fine performers at this level. We don't need a big squad of players, as evidenced by the 106 season, Chelsea's philosophy under Mourinho, and Burnley's promotion this year.
by fester_royal » 12 Jun 2009 14:30
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 12 Jun 2009 14:53
by brendywendy » 12 Jun 2009 14:59
by Alan Partridge » 12 Jun 2009 15:07
Harry Carry LOL @ Reading
Everytime I look on the BBC sport pages it's always "Rodgers confirmed as Reading manager".
No news is good news as they say. Although all the decent players will have been snapped up by the time Reading get their finger out.
Alan PartridgeHarry Carry LOL @ Reading
Everytime I look on the BBC sport pages it's always "Rodgers confirmed as Reading manager".
No news is good news as they say. Although all the decent players will have been snapped up by the time Reading get their finger out.
Terms of signings IN I doubt much will happen before early July for Reading, gives Rodgers a week or two of training with them to work out where needs strengthening and with whom.
by Stranded » 12 Jun 2009 15:35
by Archie's penalty » 12 Jun 2009 15:38
by brendywendy » 12 Jun 2009 16:01
by Barry the bird boggler » 12 Jun 2009 16:19
brendywendy preseason starts the 1st or 2nd week in july i believe
by brendywendy » 12 Jun 2009 16:26
Harry Carry I can see hammond luring in decent players. Afterall, he was a World Class player and highly respected in the game.
by Franchise FC » 12 Jun 2009 16:33
brendywendyHarry Carry I can see hammond luring in decent players. Afterall, he was a World Class player and highly respected in the game.
florentino perez was neither either , and he seems to manage it ok!
by brendywendy » 12 Jun 2009 17:08
Franchise FCbrendywendyHarry Carry I can see hammond luring in decent players. Afterall, he was a World Class player and highly respected in the game.
florentino perez was neither either , and he seems to manage it ok!
Is the budget the same ?
by Franchise FC » 12 Jun 2009 17:31
brendywendyFranchise FCbrendywendy
florentino perez was neither either , and he seems to manage it ok!
Is the budget the same ?
no, but then budget had nothing to do with the post i was replying to, as harry was making the point that squeaky wouldnt be able to attract players because he wasnt a world class player, or highly respected in the game
and it was kind of a joke too.
by brendywendy » 12 Jun 2009 17:32
by Snowball » 12 Jun 2009 17:34
Ian RoyalSnowball But if we get Tommy Smith and he reproduces this season's
form we have a winger who can score 18 goals
That's a lot of ifs.
by Snowball » 12 Jun 2009 17:37
Ian Royal
That's a lot of uncertainty. Better?
If, implied if and can.
If we sign Brayson and he can improve 7000%, we have a striker who can score 30 goals.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 189 guests