Deathy Many would have said they didn't want Chris Makin when we signed him, but he proved valuable cover.
Sign him up!
We didn't have young promising cover like Kelly around that time though did we?
by Royalee » 15 Jun 2009 01:01
Deathy Many would have said they didn't want Chris Makin when we signed him, but he proved valuable cover.
Sign him up!
by Barry the bird boggler » 15 Jun 2009 09:15
Ian RoyalDeathy Many would have said they didn't want Chris Makin when we signed him, but he proved valuable cover.
Sign him up!
We have cover at Centreback. If we sign someone there we need them to be better than what we already have. Have you not learnt what happens when you sign lots of players no better than you already have?
A big squad full of mediocre players unable to step up and turn things around when the first team aren't performing.
by brendywendy » 15 Jun 2009 10:44
If we sign someone there we need them to be better than what we already have
by Ian Royal » 15 Jun 2009 12:38
by Deathy » 15 Jun 2009 12:50
RoyaleeDeathy Many would have said they didn't want Chris Makin when we signed him, but he proved valuable cover.
Sign him up!
We didn't have young promising cover like Kelly around that time though did we?
by Royalee » 15 Jun 2009 12:52
by brendywendy » 15 Jun 2009 12:55
by Deathy » 15 Jun 2009 12:57
Royalee Bikey, Cisse, Pearce, Ingimarsson, Gunnarsson and maybe Cork at centre back - that quite enough?
by W&E Royal » 15 Jun 2009 12:59
brendywendy bikey to leave?
cisse -midfielder
pearce - young
ivar - old and injury prone
gunnarson midfielder,injury prone and considering his future
cork not ours yet.
is that still enough?
by Royalee » 15 Jun 2009 13:05
by Sun Tzu » 15 Jun 2009 13:15
DeathyRoyaleeDeathy Many would have said they didn't want Chris Makin when we signed him, but he proved valuable cover.
Sign him up!
We didn't have young promising cover like Kelly around that time though did we?
Kelly is a right back. Great help that'd be at centre back and left back!
by brendywendy » 15 Jun 2009 13:17
W&E Royalbrendywendy bikey to leave?
cisse -midfielder
pearce - young
ivar - old and injury prone
gunnarson midfielder,injury prone and considering his future
cork not ours yet.
is that still enough?
He's had one injury in six years!!
by brendywendy » 15 Jun 2009 13:19
Royalee Bikey's still here, Ingimarsson's had one bad injury in his 6 years at the club so he's hardly 'injury prone', Cisse's fine at centre back, Pearce will be quality, Gunnarsson's of similar age, probably even younger than Hreidarsson and Cork isn't ours yet, but it looks like there's every possibility he will be.
by Sun Tzu » 15 Jun 2009 13:26
brendywendyW&E Royalbrendywendy bikey to leave?
cisse -midfielder
pearce - young
ivar - old and injury prone
gunnarson midfielder,injury prone and considering his future
cork not ours yet.
is that still enough?
He's had one injury in six years!!
untrue
by brendywendy » 15 Jun 2009 13:28
Sun TzubrendywendyW&E Royal
He's had one injury in six years!!
untrue
He may have picked up the odd knock but if you look back through his record you'll struggle to find any time when he' smissed games through injury. An incredibly consistent 40+ games a season.
by Sun Tzu » 15 Jun 2009 13:34
brendywendySun Tzubrendywendy untrue
He may have picked up the odd knock but if you look back through his record you'll struggle to find any time when he' smissed games through injury. An incredibly consistent 40+ games a season.
if you'd said significant injury id agree
by brendywendy » 15 Jun 2009 13:49
Sun TzubrendywendySun Tzu
He may have picked up the odd knock but if you look back through his record you'll struggle to find any time when he' smissed games through injury. An incredibly consistent 40+ games a season.
if you'd said significant injury id agree
Why ?
If he misses a game then that defines whether an injury is significant or not doesn't it ?
He's certainly not injury prone as per the original claim....
by Royalee » 15 Jun 2009 14:10
brendywendyRoyalee Bikey's still here, Ingimarsson's had one bad injury in his 6 years at the club so he's hardly 'injury prone', Cisse's fine at centre back, Pearce will be quality, Gunnarsson's of similar age, probably even younger than Hreidarsson and Cork isn't ours yet, but it looks like there's every possibility he will be.
so youre saying youd be happy if brendan went into the season with 1 old defender, two fill in CMs, pearce and A.Loanee?
add in a happy and staying bikey and id be happier,
but if he went id happily take someone of the experience of herman as replacement
by Sun Tzu » 15 Jun 2009 14:15
brendywendySun Tzu Why ?
If he misses a game then that defines whether an injury is significant or not doesn't it ?
He's certainly not injury prone as per the original claim....
LOL
calm down calm down
hes certainly been injured on mulltiple occasions, and missed games in a couple of spells
even the most blinkered would concede this is only likely to increase
and could you please stop interfering in my royalee baiting.
by W&E Royal » 15 Jun 2009 14:20
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests