by Carlin20 » 30 Jun 2009 15:34
boy1985 Southampton a facked now so give it a couple of days and we can safely say we are bigger than them. Then we can all relax.
by Thaumagurist* » 30 Jun 2009 15:34
Arnie_Pie Pompey chav keyboard warrior. Enough said.
by West Stand Man » 30 Jun 2009 15:35
Carlin20 I've heard Reading fans say they're as big and bigger than Pompey and Southampton.
Pompey - 4 major trophies, many finals and lower league titles
Southampton - top flight 27 years
Reading are a joke. No history at all
by Carlin20 » 30 Jun 2009 15:36
by Carlin20 » 30 Jun 2009 15:40
boy1985 Who's bigger Newcastle or Sunderland?
Carlin20boy1985 Who's bigger Newcastle or Sunderland?
Newcastle. More trophies. More european ties. Longer in top flight.
by Carlin20 » 30 Jun 2009 15:42
boy1985Carlin20boy1985 Who's bigger Newcastle or Sunderland?
Newcastle. More trophies. More european ties. Longer in top flight.
Have they though?
I thought Sunderland have won the league more times than Newcastle....
by Thaumagurist* » 30 Jun 2009 15:43
boy1985Carlin20boy1985 Who's bigger Newcastle or Sunderland?
Newcastle. More trophies. More european ties. Longer in top flight.
Have they though?
I thought Sunderland have won the league more times than Newcastle....
by Carlin20 » 30 Jun 2009 15:44
by papereyes » 30 Jun 2009 15:45
Carlin20Dirk Gently Even back in teh 1980s Robert Maxwell said that a succesful club in teh Thames Valley could be a licence to print money - the catchment area for Reading potentially strecthes from just outside West London virtually to Bristol, and from North Hampshire arguably up to Banbury/Warwick - with good communications links in all four directions. That also takes in some of the most affluent areas in the UK., with numerous technology indutries in the area ensuring prosperity.
And yes, while Portsmouth and Southampton are big conurbations with a tradition of good support, they both have the disadvantage that their catchment area to the South entends only as far as the coastline, and they are so close to each that the other team imposes a "border" on their catchment area in that direction. Also, each location only has one good transport link it - to/from the NE in both cases. Plus, in both locations the traditional industries are in decline and largely have yet to be replaced.
However, having the potential and being able to exploit it are two different things - but if we're just talking about potential from a marketing and demographic point of view then Reading is ideally placed.
I totally disagree. You didn't even sellout for the playoff semi v Burnley. 5k empty seats.
Carlin20 Sunderland are currently in the Premiership, Newcastle are not...
by Carlin20 » 30 Jun 2009 15:48
boy1985Carlin20 Sunderland are currently in the Premiership, Newcastle are not...
So what. Only a mug would think Sunderland are as big as Newcastle.
by Hoop Blah » 30 Jun 2009 15:51
Carlin20 Not only that mind, Newcastle have played over 200 european ties, Sunderland have played 3.
by Thaumagurist* » 30 Jun 2009 15:53
by papereyes » 30 Jun 2009 15:54
boy1985 Watching Reading lose >>> Winning the FA cup but having to share the moment with a spastic cnut ringing a bell.
by Carlin20 » 30 Jun 2009 15:54
Hoop BlahCarlin20 Not only that mind, Newcastle have played over 200 european ties, Sunderland have played 3.
...odd, I could've sworn it was all about trophies not number of games played!
I couldn't care less who is bigger, better, more potential or which club has the hairiest bollocks, Reading is my club and I love it (most of the time anyway!) and I wouldn't want to swap it for any other, especially one as jumped up and hung up on non-existence size and importance as Pompey.
There is always a bigger and better club just round the corner, so I don't see why you're that interested in it. If it was the be all and end all you certainly woudn't be a Pompey fan Carlin.
Users browsing this forum: super darren caskey and 90 guests