by fireman_jules » 09 Jul 2009 06:37
by rg6royal » 09 Jul 2009 10:35
by AthleticoSpizz » 09 Jul 2009 19:39
by southstand67 » 12 Jul 2009 21:05
fireman_jules Its really rude to take someones picture when they are having a poo
by Barry the bird boggler » 13 Jul 2009 08:44
by bottom left hand corner » 13 Jul 2009 09:16
NR_Royal
by Platypuss » 13 Jul 2009 12:13
Barry the bird boggler <Pedant Mode On>
The title of this thread should be Rodgers' face
<Pedant Mode Off>
by Man Friday » 13 Jul 2009 12:18
PlatypussBarry the bird boggler <Pedant Mode On>
The title of this thread should be Rodgers' face
<Pedant Mode Off>
Not Rodgers's face?
by Man Friday » 13 Jul 2009 14:01
by Factfinder » 13 Jul 2009 14:06
by SteveRoyal » 13 Jul 2009 14:48
Factfinder I'm worried about his blood pressure. I hope his pies are low in salt.
by Baines » 14 Jul 2009 18:36
Man FridayPlatypussBarry the bird boggler <Pedant Mode On>
The title of this thread should be Rodgers' face
<Pedant Mode Off>
Not Rodgers's face?
It's the use of the parenthesis I've got a problem with - the closing parenthesis should come after "below" (with no comma).
by Factfinder » 14 Jul 2009 18:39
SteveRoyalFactfinder I'm worried about his blood pressure. I hope his pies are low in salt.
Why?
by NR_Royal » 14 Jul 2009 18:42
Baines I would have gone for commas rather than parentheses. However, any such errors are dwarfed by the failure to title the thread "LOOK AT HIS FACE! JUST LOOK AT HIS FACE!".
by Baines » 14 Jul 2009 18:50
by Thaumagurist* » 14 Jul 2009 21:01
NR_RoyalBaines I would have gone for commas rather than parentheses. However, any such errors are dwarfed by the failure to title the thread "LOOK AT HIS FACE! JUST LOOK AT HIS FACE!".
Happy now?
by Rawlie19 » 14 Jul 2009 21:22
Thaumagurist*NR_RoyalBaines I would have gone for commas rather than parentheses. However, any such errors are dwarfed by the failure to title the thread "LOOK AT HIS FACE! JUST LOOK AT HIS FACE!".
Happy now?
You're now just as bad as IMAMATEJOVSKY.
by Kieron1981 » 15 Jul 2009 09:49
NR_Royal Brendan Rodgers could not be more different to Coppell in every respect. With all this talk of Europe and the Premier League compared to Coppell's 'we might fail' attitude, it's clear to see that Rodgers really is his opposite. Coppell always kept a straight, mundane expression on his face much unlike Rodger's, who (as shown below, has the most expressive face I've ever seen).
Just look at this:
by SteveRoyal » 15 Jul 2009 12:41
by Focher » 15 Jul 2009 12:57
Users browsing this forum: katweslowski, tidus_mi2 and 185 guests