by Snowball » 15 Jul 2009 20:52
by Ian Royal » 15 Jul 2009 22:02
by Snowball » 15 Jul 2009 22:32
by Ian Royal » 15 Jul 2009 22:36
Snowball God Jerko, you really are a troll. aren't you?
Where did "1.2 Million" come from?
by Deathy » 15 Jul 2009 23:38
Ian RoyalSnowball God Jerko, you really are a troll. aren't you?
Where did "1.2 Million" come from?
The rumours on here that we're increasing our bid.
If that's not what you're refering to, please explain how I need to keep up, when all I'm doing is pointing out the totally obvious and incontestable fact, that three quarters of a million, is not "a million or so". It is a quarter of a million under a million. "A million or so" implies one million or a little more. Which is quite clearly incorrect.
I'm no Troll. You just don't make sense and appear to twist things to try and make the points you do.
by Royal Rother » 15 Jul 2009 23:48
by Snowball » 15 Jul 2009 23:54
Ian RoyalSnowball God Jerko, you really are a troll. aren't you?
Where did "1.2 Million" come from?
The rumours on here that we're increasing our bid.
If that's not what you're refering to, please explain how I need to keep up, when all I'm doing is pointing out the totally obvious and incontestable fact, that three quarters of a million, is not "a million or so". It is a quarter of a million under a million. "A million or so" implies one million or a little more. Which is quite clearly incorrect.
I'm no Troll. You just don't make sense and appear to twist things to try and make the points you do.
by Snowball » 16 Jul 2009 00:00
by Mike Hunt » 16 Jul 2009 04:26
Snowball I just love the way kneejerk DECIDES what one poster means by "a million or so"
According to him, it means £1,000,000 or more. He now can read minds.
So if an offer was £950,000 to £1,000,000 that WOULDN'T be a million or so?
So if an offer was £900,000 to £1,000,000 that WOULDN'T be a million or so?
Who says? Our IAN says. Therefore it's true.
Bollocks.
Let us be clear. I have not made ONE statement where I state what Reading have offered to Watford. But Jerko decides I have.
I do not say Reading have offered £750,000
I do not say Reading have offered £800,000
I do not say Reading have offered £850,000
I do not say Reading have offered £900,000
I do not say Reading have offered £950,000
I do not say Reading have offered £1,000,000
I do not say Reading have offered "a million or so"
Over to Jerk.
Snowball Now which offer is "derisory"
(a) Here is a million or so, actual money
(b) Here is a pretend 1.8 million.
by Snowball » 16 Jul 2009 08:52
Mike Hunt
Yeah you do...Snowball Now which offer is "derisory"
(a) Here is a million or so, actual money
(b) Here is a pretend 1.8 million.
by Focher » 16 Jul 2009 09:15
by Terminal Boardom » 16 Jul 2009 12:44
SnowballMike Hunt
Yeah you do...Snowball Now which offer is "derisory"
(a) Here is a million or so, actual money
(b) Here is a pretend 1.8 million.
Mike, where, in the above, did I use the word "Reading"?
Under (a) above, you and others ASSUME (or is it presume) that:
(a) Here is a million or so, actual money
refers to Reading FC.
Yet nowhere do I say a sentence which begins "Reading FC have made a formal offer of "a million or so"
I'm a professional writer. I make my living from it. Have done so for 17 years.
Too often people read something and answer something else.
All my "derisory" post was really about was saying that Sheffield's "offer"
like their alleged January offer for Lita, doesn't appear to have substance.
by (.)Boobies(.) » 16 Jul 2009 12:52
Focher i was told at Didcot last night that 'some bloke' who works for the Watford observer knows that the 2 clubs have agreed £1.2m with add ons that match Sheff Utd's offer, and they are now sorting personal terms.
I have not read through the thread so if this has been mentioned then sorry.
by Hoop Blah » 16 Jul 2009 12:57
SnowballIan RoyalSnowball God Jerko, you really are a troll. aren't you?
Where did "1.2 Million" come from?
The rumours on here that we're increasing our bid.
If that's not what you're refering to, please explain how I need to keep up, when all I'm doing is pointing out the totally obvious and incontestable fact, that three quarters of a million, is not "a million or so". It is a quarter of a million under a million. "A million or so" implies one million or a little more. Which is quite clearly incorrect.
I'm no Troll. You just don't make sense and appear to twist things to try and make the points you do.
Oh, I see. RUMOURS (not posted by me) and no actual statement by me of any bid, but you extrapolate that to me saying "1.2 Million" and then attack me for it...
Here is my post. Now read it CAREFULLY and show me where I say ANYTHING about Reading FC, or any offer of 1.2 Million
So, in other words the only club to offer 1.8 million for Smith was a club WITHOUT ANY MONEY...
Seems about right.
Now which offer is "derisory"
(a) Here is a million or so, actual money
(b) Here is a pretend 1.8 million.
I don't need to explain ANYTHING to you, Jerko. You take anything I say and extrapolate it as you think fit. You have clearly shown yourself to be a kneejerking bullshitter. You just carry on.
by Rawlie19 » 16 Jul 2009 13:20
by Thaumagurist* » 16 Jul 2009 13:21
Rawlie19 Well that was a boring and pointless argument. And for the record, a million or so is normally meant as a million or slightly more. Certainly not 250,000 less than a million. ANYWAY, grow up all of you.
by Dirk Gently » 16 Jul 2009 13:23
Thaumagurist*Rawlie19 Well that was a boring and pointless argument. And for the record, a million or so is normally meant as a million or slightly more. Certainly not 250,000 less than a million. ANYWAY, grow up all of you.
'greed with all of that.
by Snowball » 16 Jul 2009 13:24
by Snowball » 16 Jul 2009 13:26
by Snowball » 16 Jul 2009 13:31
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests