by Thaumagurist* » 17 Jul 2009 13:31
by SLAMMED » 17 Jul 2009 13:35
by Bill Oddie's Beard » 17 Jul 2009 13:37
by Thaumagurist* » 17 Jul 2009 13:38
by Bill Oddie's Beard » 17 Jul 2009 13:39
by RobRoyal » 17 Jul 2009 13:50
by Gordons Cumming » 17 Jul 2009 14:02
Thaumagurist*
Take a good look at this picture and vote.
by Thaumagurist* » 17 Jul 2009 14:07
Gordons CummingThaumagurist*
Take a good look at this picture and vote.
Was that picture taken before they put the seats in the Mad Stad?
Must have been early 1998.
by Darren Caskey's Dietician » 17 Jul 2009 14:16
by RobRoyal » 17 Jul 2009 14:16
Darren Caskey's Dietician Early days, no. But his favour to booze it and eat crap was a big reason Spurs let us have him in the first place.
He went downhill from there. If he'd kept in shape, god knows how good he could have become, but instead, he let me change his diet to beer and pukka pies, with a whole death by chocolate for desert, and the rest was history.
by Kieron1981 » 17 Jul 2009 14:29
by Thaumagurist* » 17 Jul 2009 14:38
Kieron1981
the answer is yes
by FiNeRaIn » 17 Jul 2009 14:44
by Thaumagurist* » 17 Jul 2009 14:46
FiNeRaIn Fat is a ridiculous word to describe a professional footballer. Overweight maybe, but still 10 times fitter than anyone on this forum.
by prostak » 17 Jul 2009 14:49
by rg6royal » 17 Jul 2009 14:52
FiNeRaIn Fat is a ridiculous word to describe a professional footballer. Overweight maybe, but still 10 times fitter than anyone on this forum.
by CMRoyal » 17 Jul 2009 14:56
by Thaumagurist* » 17 Jul 2009 14:57
CMRoyal No he wasn't really fat - he was just quite fat. Neil Ruddock - now, there was a man was/is really fat.
by georgerob » 17 Jul 2009 15:05
Users browsing this forum: Carnabyswhiskers, Royal Ginger and 193 guests