Tommy Smith - Gazumped by Pompey - Thread

2326 posts
User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by brendywendy » 30 Jul 2009 10:10

RobRoyal
brendywendy kebes left footed


Is he really? Remarkable :shock:

He's one of those players where it's quite hard to tell.

And not in a good way.



BAH


you will eat your words kebe hater








:oops:

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by brendywendy » 30 Jul 2009 10:11

Platypuss Director of football Nick Hammond said: 'Jimmy is a winger who has a bit of pace and is a good size at over six foot tall. He is right footed but is comfortable on both sides of pitch.

'He's been playing in the French second division, so hasn't really been on people's radars. But we've been aware of him for some time. And every time our staff have watched Jimmy he's had a major impact on a game.

'Obviously it's a massive step up from that level to the English Premier League. But the same could have been said for a number of our players when they first came to the club.

'They have made the transition and we hope Jimmy can do the same.'

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=502798&cc=5739



wasnt that just when they were trying to fool us into believing he was the answer to our right wing problems?

:)

tee peg
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1800
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 13:05
Location: gloucester

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by tee peg » 31 Jul 2009 08:27

According to the mirror the Smith deal fell through due to his wage demands of £14k
per week :shock:

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by Wycombe Royal » 31 Jul 2009 08:59

tee peg According to the mirror the Smith deal fell through due to his wage demands of £14k
per week :shock:

That is what he is on at Watford.

howser
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1651
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 20:27
Location: moray scotland

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by howser » 31 Jul 2009 09:14

A deal falling through due to wages ?? ..........................unusual for Reading to fail to land a player for those reasons !! lol


tee peg
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1800
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 13:05
Location: gloucester

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by tee peg » 31 Jul 2009 09:15

Less than half of what Hunt is meant to be on.The more I think about it the more convinced I am that Smith
will be at the Mad stad anytime soon.A million or so in their coffers and a bigish wage off the books.To bigger
overhead/income to resist.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by Ian Royal » 31 Jul 2009 12:37

Assuming we're still after Smith, we must want him alot. If that's the case we'd cough up £14k week no problems

I can't see the problem being his wage demands.

tee peg
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1800
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 13:05
Location: gloucester

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by tee peg » 31 Jul 2009 14:31

The Chronical thinks there may be a swap deal Hunt/Nugent.Maybe Smith is off the radar.

gazzer, loyal royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1935
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 21:45
Location: Khalifa Cisse sleeps with the light on, not because he is afraid of the dark, but because the dark i

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by gazzer, loyal royal » 31 Jul 2009 14:57

we can't bid until we sell Hunt as we have no money to spend on players

so the sooner we can get rid of Hunt, the earlier we sign Smith

simples


User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by Arch » 31 Jul 2009 15:06

tee peg According to the mirror the Smith deal fell through due to his wage demands of £14k
per week :shock:

Unlikely, given that there's no evidence a bid was accepted by the club so it wouldn't have got as far as personal terms. Incidentally, note that "big spending" Sheffield Utd are having trouble landing their targets because of the terms they're offering.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by Wycombe Royal » 31 Jul 2009 15:19

Arch Incidentally, note that "big spending" Sheffield Utd are having trouble landing their targets because of the terms they're offering.

Are they? Like who?

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by Arch » 31 Jul 2009 15:23

Wycombe Royal
Arch Incidentally, note that "big spending" Sheffield Utd are having trouble landing their targets because of the terms they're offering.

Are they? Like who?
Tommy Smith and Glen Little for two.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by Wycombe Royal » 31 Jul 2009 15:29

Arch
Wycombe Royal
Arch Incidentally, note that "big spending" Sheffield Utd are having trouble landing their targets because of the terms they're offering.

Are they? Like who?
Tommy Smith and Glen Little for two.

Tommy Smith didn't turn them down because of wages and I didn't know Little had turned them down (I've not seen it reported anywhere). Last I heard they were offering him a contract.


tee peg
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1800
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 13:05
Location: gloucester

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by tee peg » 31 Jul 2009 15:32

Sheff utd thought 14k per week was too much for Smith.

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by Arch » 31 Jul 2009 15:32

"Blackwell added: "I've offered Glen a contract, but I think his mum and dad want to get involved and his daughter and sister, so we'll see. He's done well and we've put in an offer that we think is genuinely worth taking into consideration."

I didn't say he'd turned them down. And I didn't mention wages. On Smith, the clubs agreed a handsome fee and the player did not come to personal terms. My only point is, primarily aimed at howser, that this is not some Reading thing where we're too cheap to sign the players we need.

User avatar
Southbank Old Boy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1954
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 18:42

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by Southbank Old Boy » 31 Jul 2009 15:33

tee peg Sheff utd thought 14k per week was too much for Smith.


That and Smith didnt want to go up there

tee peg
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1800
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 13:05
Location: gloucester

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by tee peg » 31 Jul 2009 15:34

........due to them not wanting to pay 14k per week I assume.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by Wycombe Royal » 31 Jul 2009 15:38

Arch "Blackwell added: "I've offered Glen a contract, but I think his mum and dad want to get involved and his daughter and sister, so we'll see. He's done well and we've put in an offer that we think is genuinely worth taking into consideration."

I didn't say he'd turned them down. And I didn't mention wages. On Smith, the clubs agreed a handsome fee and the player did not come to personal terms. My only point is, primarily aimed at howser, that this is not some Reading thing where we're too cheap to sign the players we need.

So basically they are not have problems landing their targets due to the terms they have offered as you previously wrote. They could offer Tommy Smith more than he is on at Watford and he still won't go there. As for Little there is nothing in Blackwell's comments to suggest Little isn't happy with the terms offered. I would guess Little has an issue with moving his family north for what could be his last contract. Part of his reason for moving to us was because he wanted to be back down south near where he comes from.

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by Arch » 31 Jul 2009 15:40

Wycombe Royal
Arch "Blackwell added: "I've offered Glen a contract, but I think his mum and dad want to get involved and his daughter and sister, so we'll see. He's done well and we've put in an offer that we think is genuinely worth taking into consideration."

I didn't say he'd turned them down. And I didn't mention wages. On Smith, the clubs agreed a handsome fee and the player did not come to personal terms. My only point is, primarily aimed at howser, that this is not some Reading thing where we're too cheap to sign the players we need.

So basically they are not have problems landing their targets due to the terms they have offered as you previously wrote. They could offer Tommy Smith more than he is on at Watford and he still won't go there. As for Little there is nothing in Blackwell's comments to suggest Little isn't happy with the terms offered. I would guess Little has an issue with moving his family north for what could be his last contract. Part of his reason for moving to us was because he wanted to be back down south near where he comes from.

Spin it how you like, if you want Reading to look bad. There's nothing I can do about that.

tee peg
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1800
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 13:05
Location: gloucester

Re: The Unruined Tommy Smith RUMOUR Thread

by tee peg » 31 Jul 2009 15:44

Fair points and no doubt true.We tend to forget things like wives/kids in the transfer equation and more
relevant in the case of Little.

2326 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 59 guests

It is currently 23 Nov 2024 22:37