by Royalee » 03 Aug 2009 16:12
by brendywendy » 03 Aug 2009 16:17
He admitted he was wrong to drop Karacan and he dropped Pearce at the expense of Duberry who has now ended up at the mighty Wycombe Wanderers which goes to show his level. Kelly started a whole four games, Henry wasn't given any chance especially given how shit both our wingers were and Church was thrown in as a wildcard when Coppell was in the middle of throwing away a playoff second leg.
by brendywendy » 03 Aug 2009 16:19
Royalee Mark McGhee and Alan Pardew both did more for the club's long term progress than Coppell also.
by Royalee » 03 Aug 2009 16:21
brendywendyRoyalee Mark McGhee and Alan Pardew both did more for the club's long term progress than Coppell also.
LOL at that
and LOL at you.
yes they built well, and yes their abilities and achievements are tainted by the manner of their departures.
but really, i have to disagree in the strongest possible terms.
especially coming from a man who now regularly praises the abilities of the youth team that was put together by who......?
coppell
by Royalee » 03 Aug 2009 16:24
brendywendyHe admitted he was wrong to drop Karacan and he dropped Pearce at the expense of Duberry who has now ended up at the mighty Wycombe Wanderers which goes to show his level. Kelly started a whole four games, Henry wasn't given any chance especially given how shit both our wingers were and Church was thrown in as a wildcard when Coppell was in the middle of throwing away a playoff second leg.
so they did get chances then
knew i was right........
also-can you see BR admitting to any mistakes that he may make in the future?
i cant.
by sandman » 03 Aug 2009 16:25
Royalee Mark McGhee and Alan Pardew both did more for the club's long term progress than Coppell also.
by brendywendy » 03 Aug 2009 16:26
by Vision » 03 Aug 2009 16:26
Royalee You are so blinkered and deluded over how and what Coppell did it's pathetic.
by brendywendy » 03 Aug 2009 16:30
RoyaleebrendywendyHe admitted he was wrong to drop Karacan and he dropped Pearce at the expense of Duberry who has now ended up at the mighty Wycombe Wanderers which goes to show his level. Kelly started a whole four games, Henry wasn't given any chance especially given how shit both our wingers were and Church was thrown in as a wildcard when Coppell was in the middle of throwing away a playoff second leg.
so they did get chances then
knew i was right........
also-can you see BR admitting to any mistakes that he may make in the future?
i cant.
So dropping a player purely because of age and then admitting you were wrong is giving them a chance? How many chances did the more senior pros get when they simply weren't performing for half of last season? You are so blinkered and deluded over how and what Coppell did it's pathetic.
Rodgers has admitted he still has lots to learn in the press and is honest, but you won't be seeing as many admissions from him as he won't make half as many mistakes as Mr 'I don't know what went wrong with my 20 years of experience'.
but you won't be seeing as many admissions from him as he won't make half as many mistakes as Mr 'I don't know what went wrong with my 20 years of experience'.
by RoyalBird » 03 Aug 2009 16:31
by Ian Royal » 03 Aug 2009 16:33
by Royalee » 03 Aug 2009 16:33
brendywendy your total coppell negativity does you no credit at all
makes you sound like a deranged loser.
at least i am capable of praising rodgers for the good things he does.
i am totally aware of who the coaches were,but that really doesnt mean coppell had no input in their signings or progressions, to say so makes you seem as myopic as you say he was.
also do you refuse to credit coppell for his blooding of these youngsters? or for the numerous 1st team league chances i detailed previously?
and in answer to your last question
because hes the manager you dolt
by brendywendy » 03 Aug 2009 16:39
At times he was left with no other choice but to play Pearce and Karacan and even then he didn't bother! My Coppell 'negativity' is my reflection that over 6 years he failed to deliver in 4 of them and IMO wasted a superb chance to prove himself as more than an average, Neil Warnock/Joe Royle/Ian Dowie/George Burley/Peter Taylor journeyman manager by bottling it when we went up. It also really angers me that we had someone in the job who wasn't even sure if he wanted it for a year after we went down just because his ego got a boost by some idiots in a car park space.
Rodgers was involved in the signing of the likes of Pearce, Karacan, Henry and so forth if you bothered to check - that's why we have an academy manager in addition to a first team manager although you seem to be finding this hard to grasp.
by Royalee » 03 Aug 2009 16:45
by Terminal Boardom » 03 Aug 2009 16:45
Royalee Mark McGhee and Alan Pardew both did more for the club's long term progress than Coppell also.
by brendywendy » 03 Aug 2009 16:49
Royalee Good managers aren't out of work or managing League One sides over 20 years into their managerial careers as a general rule. You really are quite dense.
by brendywendy » 03 Aug 2009 16:50
weren't so far up Coppell's backside
by Thaumagurist* » 03 Aug 2009 16:51
Royalee Mark McGhee and Alan Pardew both did more for the club's long term progress than Coppell also.
by Royalee » 03 Aug 2009 16:52
by Royalee » 03 Aug 2009 16:53
Thaumagurist*Royalee Mark McGhee and Alan Pardew both did more for the club's long term progress than Coppell also.
Wha....................????
I'd rate Coppell's 2005/6 side much higher than McGhoo's 1994 side and Pardoo's 2001/2 side.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 283 guests