by Thaumagurist* » 07 Aug 2009 10:08
by barmy_army008 » 07 Aug 2009 12:08
Thaumagurist* Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.Mills.jpg
by Rawlie19 » 07 Aug 2009 13:11
Thaumagurist* Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.Mills.jpg
by (.)Boobies(.) » 07 Aug 2009 13:29
Rawlie19Thaumagurist* Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.Mills.jpg
BS. Show me the original image without the red arrow.
by Rawlie19 » 07 Aug 2009 13:33
by (.)Boobies(.) » 07 Aug 2009 14:12
Rawlie19 Well that's just shit then. I hope they're paying more for it. Cheap chavy looking shirts have names on the arse... oh, yeah, our shirt IS cheap chavy looking.
by chilipepper91 » 07 Aug 2009 14:32
Rawlie19Thaumagurist* Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.Mills.jpg
BS. Show me the original image without the red arrow.
by Thaumagurist* » 07 Aug 2009 14:55
(.)Boobies(.)Rawlie19 Well that's just shit then. I hope they're paying more for it. Cheap chavy looking shirts have names on the arse... oh, yeah, our shirt IS cheap chavy looking.
If we continue to sign players like Matt Mills, I'm sure some sponsorship on the arse of the shirt really isn't all that bad.
by Drew_3 » 07 Aug 2009 16:06
by Thaumagurist* » 07 Aug 2009 16:20
Drew_3 supporters shirts dont have that (we did in the 106 year)so i guessed it was just because he was holding the shirt back to front because of wanting to show the name and the number, and the club felt abliged to have waitrose on it somewhere, the shirts in pre-season have not had it on.
by Platypuss » 07 Aug 2009 16:37
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 07 Aug 2009 17:17
Platypuss Is it really worse than copy >>> print >>> scan >>> fax, though?
by Rawlie19 » 09 Aug 2009 13:38
(.)Boobies(.)Rawlie19Thaumagurist* Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.Mills.jpg
BS. Show me the original image without the red arrow.
Waitrose is indeed on the back, Rawlie.
by SLAMMED » 10 Aug 2009 01:46
(.)Boobies(.)Rawlie19Thaumagurist* Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.Mills.jpg
BS. Show me the original image without the red arrow.
Waitrose is indeed on the back, Rawlie.
by (.)Boobies(.) » 10 Aug 2009 09:31
by rabidbee » 10 Aug 2009 10:35
by Rawlie19 » 10 Aug 2009 10:37
by URZZ » 10 Aug 2009 16:53
by Thaumagurist* » 10 Aug 2009 17:29
(.)Boobies(.) Did anyone have their shirt untucked? Perhaps it's unviewable without being untucked? The few photos I saw recently all had it at the bottom. My assumption hopefully wrong in any case. I also disliked the home kit even more for seeing them play in it on Saturday.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests