bigmike If this does happen I still wont take back what I said about Squeaky hammond. The way this has been conducted is not they way I have come to expect of the reading that I support
What on Earth has Hammond done wrong?
by Royal Rother » 24 Aug 2009 15:26
bigmike If this does happen I still wont take back what I said about Squeaky hammond. The way this has been conducted is not they way I have come to expect of the reading that I support
by Dirk Gently » 24 Aug 2009 15:26
(.)Boobies(.)bigmike If this does happen I still wont take back what I said about Squeaky hammond. The way this has been conducted is not they way I have come to expect of the reading that I support
You're clearly an idiot. Hammond has been immense for this football club in a very unfashionable director of football role.
by brendywendy » 24 Aug 2009 15:27
by SteveRoyal » 24 Aug 2009 15:27
SteveRoyal Phoarrr. Brilliant.
Watford 0 - 2 Reading FC.
Scorers: Rodgers' & Smith.
by Big Ern » 24 Aug 2009 15:28
Royal RotherBig ErnYellowcoat Big Ern - where is any evidence that his loans have been taken back? Virtually no change in the figures
available for the last 3 years. Unless next years accounts prove anything else this myth should not be encouraged.
There are 2 compnaies involved in the ownship of the club...only the accounts for one of these companies is published ... I wonder why????
Ah, righto!! The baseless conspiracy theory face-saving move. Pretty feeble tbf.
by Royal_Belly » 24 Aug 2009 15:28
brendywendy maybe if we cooo him down like the dove from above , then he will come
coooooo, cooooooo
by bigmike » 24 Aug 2009 15:28
Focher(.)Boobies(.) John Madejski "I'm delighted to welcome Tommy here. He's a top professional, a Reading player, and his signing underlines our ambition to return to the Premier League" .
he may add "and just a short message to those who were sing "" on Saturday, Fuk off you c**ts'
by Royal Rother » 24 Aug 2009 15:29
Dirk Gently(.)Boobies(.)bigmike If this does happen I still wont take back what I said about Squeaky hammond. The way this has been conducted is not they way I have come to expect of the reading that I support
You're clearly an idiot. Hammond has been immense for this football club in a very unfashionable director of football role.
Look closely and you'll see that all the leaks and mis-information have come from Reading, not Watford - apart from the occasion when BR opened his big mouth at the start of the saga. So whoever you decide is to blame, Hammond ought to be in the clear.
by Dorset-Knob » 24 Aug 2009 15:29
bigmike If this does happen I still wont take back what I said about Squeaky hammond. The way this has been conducted is not they way I have come to expect of the reading that I support
by Dirk Gently » 24 Aug 2009 15:30
Royal RotherDirk Gently Look closely and you'll see that all the leaks and mis-information have come from Reading, not Watford - apart from the occasion when BR opened his big mouth at the start of the saga. So whoever you decide is to blame, Hammond ought to be in the clear.
by premiership_bound » 24 Aug 2009 15:33
M-U-R-T-Y Would be funny if he failed the medical.
by Royal Rother » 24 Aug 2009 15:33
Yellowcoat Big Ern - where is any evidence that his loans have been taken back? Virtually no change in the figures
available for the last 3 years. Unless next years accounts prove anything else this myth should not be encouraged.
Big ErnRoyal RotherBig Ern
There are 2 compnaies involved in the ownship of the club...only the accounts for one of these companies is published ... I wonder why????
Ah, righto!! The baseless conspiracy theory face-saving move. Pretty feeble tbf.
http://www.alertresearch.co.uk//company ... yid=247138
&
http://www.alertresearch.co.uk/company. ... anyid=3605
by SteveRoyal » 24 Aug 2009 15:34
Rick Holden Forever, St Albans And Tommy, why Reading? Of all the clubs, you had to go and join up with that total **** who seems intent on offending us. I'm not being funny, but i hope you all get relegated.
garyporter1, london A side-ways move for TS just like BR's style of football! Not the end of the world. Plenty more Tommy Smiths and Nigel Callghans in the sea!
Hexham Hornet, HEXHAM Good luck Tommy, but I hope if you go to Reading you are not in a team that wins promotion!! I think you are better than finishing your career there, and other clubs that have shown an interest will do better than they will.
by (.)Boobies(.) » 24 Aug 2009 15:35
Dirk Gently(.)Boobies(.)bigmike If this does happen I still wont take back what I said about Squeaky hammond. The way this has been conducted is not they way I have come to expect of the reading that I support
You're clearly an idiot. Hammond has been immense for this football club in a very unfashionable director of football role.
Look closely and you'll see that all the leaks and mis-information have come from not Watford, not Reading - apart from the occasion when BR opened his big mouth at the start of the saga. So whoever you decide is to blame, Hammond ought to be in the clear.
by Big Ern » 24 Aug 2009 15:36
Royal Rother
Does this show that Madejski has actually taken his loans back as you claim?
by (.)Boobies(.) » 24 Aug 2009 15:37
SteveRoyal http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/sport/localsport/4562165.Smith_having_medical_at_Reading/Rick Holden Forever, St Albans And Tommy, why Reading? Of all the clubs, you had to go and join up with that total **** who seems intent on offending us. I'm not being funny, but i hope you all get relegated.garyporter1, london A side-ways move for TS just like BR's style of football! Not the end of the world. Plenty more Tommy Smiths and Nigel Callghans in the sea!Hexham Hornet, HEXHAM Good luck Tommy, but I hope if you go to Reading you are not in a team that wins promotion!! I think you are better than finishing your career there, and other clubs that have shown an interest will do better than they will.
Hmm. Is it possible for a new "derby" to come out of this summer?
by Royal Lady » 24 Aug 2009 15:37
by Arnie_Pie » 24 Aug 2009 15:38
Big ErnRoyal Rother
Does this show that Madejski has actually taken his loans back as you claim?
No, but it does show there are 2 companies and we only get shown the accounts for one of them....I wonder why that is???
by Royal Lady » 24 Aug 2009 15:40
by winchester_royal » 24 Aug 2009 15:41
winchester_royal TBH I think this is just the WFC chairman playing games. I still expect this to come through.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests