by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 01 Sep 2009 16:18
by winchester_royal » 01 Sep 2009 16:18
Royal RotherHogmeister RoyalWest Stand Flash lets hope the Howard deal goes through otherwise we look a little lightweight in midfield.
Whilst we may disagree about the quality of central midfield, we are certainly not short of quantity. For just three starting places (assuming 4-5-1) I make it that we currently have nine players (choose your own preferred order)... Harps, Marek, McAnuff, Tabb, Bryn, Karacan, Davies, Gylfi and Cisse. So an on any given day you'd expect 7 of those to either be on the bench or not involved at all(albeit some of those names can and do play in other positions, of course).
So I don't think we're lightweight there and, in fact, central midfield is the primary position where we could easily let a couple go.
I tend to agree, Howard doesn't seem very necessary. Certainly can't see it happening if Harper and Marek stay on our books. What'd be the point?
by W&E Royal » 01 Sep 2009 16:19
Gus the teenage cowW&E RoyalGus the teenage cow brenda said we were getting in 3 or 4 after rasiak and mcanuff
ok so o dea is on and howard is on his way (no fees for both, surprise, surprise)
i want at least one decent permanent signing and ideally two
two from these three and I'll be satisfied:
stock, campbell-ryce, king
Since when do you decide which players we sign or don't sign?
by winchester_royal » 01 Sep 2009 16:21
IMAMATEOFJOVSKY How the oxf*rd would you know.
I trust Brendan far more than you on who this club needs.
Yes well you would, if its good for Brendan its good for me, - the fact that you rate Howard just about sums you up! Cock!
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 01 Sep 2009 16:21
by Archie's penalty » 01 Sep 2009 16:22
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 01 Sep 2009 16:22
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 01 Sep 2009 16:23
winchester_royalIMAMATEOFJOVSKY How the oxf*rd would you know.
I trust Brendan far more than you on who this club needs.
Yes well you would, if its good for Brendan its good for me, - the fact that you rate Howard just about sums you up! Cock!
Bless.
Brendan Rodgers = Highly respected coach.
IMAMATEOFJOVSKY = Keyboard warrior.
Yes, I can see why your opinion is of more value to the club.
by Hogmeister Royal » 01 Sep 2009 16:23
IMAMATEOFJOVSKY Im sure that Rodgers said to Bugs "go and get Brian Stock" so he went and got Brian Howard...he's not having a good time lately!
by southbank1871 » 01 Sep 2009 16:24
IMAMATEOFJOVSKY How the oxf*rd would you know.
I trust Brendan far more than you on who this club needs.
Yes well you would, if its good for Brendan its good for me, - the fact that you rate Howard just about sums you up! Cock!
by winchester_royal » 01 Sep 2009 16:24
Archie's penalty I want Marek to go and Harps to stay and then for Howard to come in. He gives us something different. And Marek let's face it, has had his chance and blown it. Harps is more adaptable so if any of the two stayed I'd expect it to be him. Marek is talented but is awful at tackling and lightweight. Howard, from what I have seen, is pretty nifty and bright (he was Barnsley's captain and playmaker).
But what could happen is Both stay. Marek rots in the reserves and Howard fights Mcanuff and others for a starting place in the first team.
by W&E Royal » 01 Sep 2009 16:24
IMAMATEOFJOVSKY Im sure that Rodgers said to Bugs "go and get Brian Stock" so he went and got Brian Howard...he's not having a good time lately!
by Barry the bird boggler » 01 Sep 2009 16:24
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 01 Sep 2009 16:25
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe How many times have our scouts watched Stock and Howard?
I'd guess between them over 100 times.
We all know from the opions people have of our players from the outside. It's impossible to make a judgement on a player without watching them pretty regular.
The little I've seen of both them seem different types of players. The fact we're going to Howard shows the type of player we want, which rules out Stock.
by Royal Rother » 01 Sep 2009 16:26
winchester_royalRoyal RotherHogmeister Royal Whilst we may disagree about the quality of central midfield, we are certainly not short of quantity. For just three starting places (assuming 4-5-1) I make it that we currently have nine players (choose your own preferred order)... Harps, Marek, McAnuff, Tabb, Bryn, Karacan, Davies, Gylfi and Cisse. So an on any given day you'd expect 7 of those to either be on the bench or not involved at all(albeit some of those names can and do play in other positions, of course).
So I don't think we're lightweight there and, in fact, central midfield is the primary position where we could easily let a couple go.
I tend to agree, Howard doesn't seem very necessary. Certainly can't see it happening if Harper and Marek stay on our books. What'd be the point?
Maybe Brendan believes Howard would up the quality of the midfield....
by Archie's penalty » 01 Sep 2009 16:27
winchester_royalArchie's penalty I want Marek to go and Harps to stay and then for Howard to come in. He gives us something different. And Marek let's face it, has had his chance and blown it. Harps is more adaptable so if any of the two stayed I'd expect it to be him. Marek is talented but is awful at tackling and lightweight. Howard, from what I have seen, is pretty nifty and bright (he was Barnsley's captain and playmaker).
But what could happen is Both stay. Marek rots in the reserves and Howard fights Mcanuff and others for a starting place in the first team.
Ermm....I don't think so.
by winchester_royal » 01 Sep 2009 16:28
Archie's penaltywinchester_royalArchie's penalty I want Marek to go and Harps to stay and then for Howard to come in. He gives us something different. And Marek let's face it, has had his chance and blown it. Harps is more adaptable so if any of the two stayed I'd expect it to be him. Marek is talented but is awful at tackling and lightweight. Howard, from what I have seen, is pretty nifty and bright (he was Barnsley's captain and playmaker).
But what could happen is Both stay. Marek rots in the reserves and Howard fights Mcanuff and others for a starting place in the first team.
Ermm....I don't think so.
Why not? They're both left-footed no?
by CMRoyal » 01 Sep 2009 16:28
by Royal Rother » 01 Sep 2009 16:29
IMAMATEOFJOVSKYSmoking Kills Dancing Doe How many times have our scouts watched Stock and Howard?
I'd guess between them over 100 times.
We all know from the opions people have of our players from the outside. It's impossible to make a judgement on a player without watching them pretty regular.
The little I've seen of both them seem different types of players. The fact we're going to Howard shows the type of player we want, which rules out Stock.
its down to money - Stock is rated at £3m, well above anything that we are going to pay - Howard as has been stated is a "makeweight" and cheap --like buying a Ford and a Mercedes ..you pay for the quality
by Archie's penalty » 01 Sep 2009 16:30
winchester_royal No.
Also McAnuff is a winger, and Howard plays in the middle.
Users browsing this forum: bcubed, Bristol Paul, Google Adsense [Bot], Greatwesternline, LUX, Richard, Snowflake Royal, Sutekh, WestYorksRoyal and 321 guests