by phil in cornwall » 01 Sep 2009 16:30
by winchester_royal » 01 Sep 2009 16:30
Archie's penaltywinchester_royal No.
Also McAnuff is a winger, and Howard plays in the middle.
From what I have seen of Howard he can play across the midfield and is very left-footed. Anyway let's see what happens.
I hope Marek goes!
by johnnym » 01 Sep 2009 16:34
by georgerob » 01 Sep 2009 16:35
by Gordons Cumming » 01 Sep 2009 16:36
by Royal Lady » 01 Sep 2009 16:37
by juanpablo » 01 Sep 2009 16:41
Royal Lady If they want Harper, why would we want Howard? Surely they are saying that they rate Harper above Howard?
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 01 Sep 2009 16:41
IMAMATEOFJOVSKYSmoking Kills Dancing Doe How many times have our scouts watched Stock and Howard?
I'd guess between them over 100 times.
We all know from the opions people have of our players from the outside. It's impossible to make a judgement on a player without watching them pretty regular.
The little I've seen of both them seem different types of players. The fact we're going to Howard shows the type of player we want, which rules out Stock.
its down to money - Stock is rated at £3m, well above anything that we are going to pay - Howard as has been stated is a "makeweight" and cheap --like buying a Ford and a Mercedes ..you pay for the quality
by rg6royal » 01 Sep 2009 16:43
juanpabloRoyal Lady If they want Harper, why would we want Howard? Surely they are saying that they rate Harper above Howard?
Different types of players fit into different sides.....
by Ian Royal » 01 Sep 2009 16:43
juanpabloRoyal Lady If they want Harper, why would we want Howard? Surely they are saying that they rate Harper above Howard?
Different types of players fit into different sides.....
by LoyalRoyalFan » 01 Sep 2009 16:44
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 01 Sep 2009 16:46
Smoking Kills Dancing DoeIMAMATEOFJOVSKYSmoking Kills Dancing Doe How many times have our scouts watched Stock and Howard?
I'd guess between them over 100 times.
We all know from the opions people have of our players from the outside. It's impossible to make a judgement on a player without watching them pretty regular.
The little I've seen of both them seem different types of players. The fact we're going to Howard shows the type of player we want, which rules out Stock.
its down to money - Stock is rated at £3m, well above anything that we are going to pay - Howard as has been stated is a "makeweight" and cheap --like buying a Ford and a Mercedes ..you pay for the quality
How do you know that though?
all im saying here is that Stock is a better option than Howard - not only from a footballing perspective, but as an investment ... im not saying what Rodgers should do ...but ALL of us have our ideas of who we would like at club and not necessarily who Rodgers would like here
Maybe Rodgers doesn't rate?
As I said that the fact we're going for Howard, shows we want a midfielder like Howard (and don't say like a shit midfielder smart ass!!) rather than one in the Stock mould. Shirley if we wanted a player like Stock, we would have signed a player like Stock if we couldn't afford Stock.
22 mins, even I'm watching SSN now.
mmmmmmmmmmm Georgie
by Gordons Cumming » 01 Sep 2009 16:46
by tomrfcurz » 01 Sep 2009 16:46
by shaka's shorts » 01 Sep 2009 16:46
by Royal Lady » 01 Sep 2009 16:47
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 01 Sep 2009 16:48
shaka's shorts just on SSN - Harps and Howard in one year loan swap
by Gordons Cumming » 01 Sep 2009 16:48
by Woodcote Royal » 01 Sep 2009 16:49
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 01 Sep 2009 16:49
rg6royaljuanpabloRoyal Lady If they want Harper, why would we want Howard? Surely they are saying that they rate Harper above Howard?
Different types of players fit into different sides.....
Exactly. Howard is a more attacking player and technically superior. On the other hand Harper is more of a defensive midfielder.
Will be a great signing if it goes through as he can play anywhere across the midfield.
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers and 221 guests