AthleticoSpizzSuccinct answerwinchester_royalAthleticoSpizz why will they not play?
I ask i an annoying FGS manner
Not good enough.
I trust your expertise
If they were they would be playing.
Not opinion, just logic.
by winchester_royal » 06 Sep 2009 01:21
AthleticoSpizzSuccinct answerwinchester_royalAthleticoSpizz why will they not play?
I ask i an annoying FGS manner
Not good enough.
I trust your expertise
by Ian Royal » 06 Sep 2009 01:21
by leww_rfc » 06 Sep 2009 01:24
Ian Royal Don't think Henry will go out on loan, he appears to be being trialled for the middle and if he went on loan he'd play as a winger.
Mooney might benefit from a short loan, but he can't be a million miles from starting. Scored a couple of good goals against Burton.
We'd be insane to loan out Pearce until Ingimarsson is 100% match fit.
Davies could be in bother with Howard coming in and Siggurdsson playing well, so we might try and get him out at a higher level than he was at with Aldershot. Tabb and Cisse don't seem too high up the pecking order at the moment, so they're potential candidates for loan moves. Especially as Cisse doesn't really fit our passing style. Given the relative height of the rest of our midfielders, I'm not sure we can carry Tabb, especially as he doesn't offer significantly more than most of the others.
Antonio seems an ideal candidate for a loan.
Generally we know so little about how our team is going to line up, and which combination will work, that we'd be stupid to send out more than one or two on loan at this time. Maybe more in a month or two when we know more about who's going to be playing regularly and who's needed for the bench and cover.
by Royalwaster » 06 Sep 2009 11:01
by Deathy » 06 Sep 2009 17:51
Royalwaster This is supposed to be a thread updating how loan players are doing, not a general discussion on who should be loaned out or not ....
by Platypuss » 06 Sep 2009 19:01
DeathyRoyalwaster This is supposed to be a thread updating how loan players are doing, not a general discussion on who should be loaned out or not ....
It's a loan watch. Who says that can't include speculation about who may go out on loan?
by leww_rfc » 06 Sep 2009 19:13
Royalwaster This is supposed to be a thread updating how loan players are doing, not a general discussion on who should be loaned out or not ....
by Royalwaster » 06 Sep 2009 22:05
leww_rfcRoyalwaster This is supposed to be a thread updating how loan players are doing, not a general discussion on who should be loaned out or not ....
does it matter? theres a thread on here, with people still going on about Tommy Smith! Let us talk about what we like.
by Terminal Boardom » 06 Sep 2009 22:48
leww_rfcRoyalwaster This is supposed to be a thread updating how loan players are doing, not a general discussion on who should be loaned out or not ....
does it matter? theres a thread on here, with people still going on about Tommy Smith! Let us talk about what we like.
by leww_rfc » 06 Sep 2009 23:06
Terminal Boardomleww_rfcRoyalwaster This is supposed to be a thread updating how loan players are doing, not a general discussion on who should be loaned out or not ....
does it matter? theres a thread on here, with people still going on about Tommy Smith! Let us talk about what we like.
Talking of which, I hear he is having a medical.
by Royal Lady » 07 Sep 2009 09:21
by Sun Tzu » 07 Sep 2009 09:50
by Maguire » 07 Sep 2009 10:19
Sun Tzu We'll have a better idea in 10-12 games I would guess.
by winchester_royal » 08 Sep 2009 13:02
by leww_rfc » 08 Sep 2009 15:58
winchester_royal Back on topic.........
Andersen kept a clean-sheet on debut, and the Rovers fans very complimentary
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A56772444
by Sun Tzu » 08 Sep 2009 16:00
by shaka's shorts » 09 Sep 2009 09:09
by Ryn » 10 Sep 2009 09:14
by Sun Tzu » 10 Sep 2009 10:03
Ryn I think Mikkel will become a better kepper than Fedders. Good to see him getting some solid first team experience :thumbs up:
by 79Royal » 10 Sep 2009 11:19
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 225 guests