by Maguire » 10 Sep 2009 10:23
by Sun Tzu » 10 Sep 2009 10:43
Royal LadySun Tzu Has there been a match since then ?
Hard to be match fit without having a match.
Not being match fit doesn't stop you playing in a match though.
by Royal Lady » 10 Sep 2009 10:49
by Wycombe Royal » 10 Sep 2009 10:54
Royal Lady :roll: He hasn't played in any reserve games either, so it's not a case of not being match fit, it's a case of being INJURED. I can't be bothered to get into an argument about it.
by Sun Tzu » 10 Sep 2009 11:45
by Old Biscuitman » 10 Sep 2009 12:31
Sun Tzu You can usually maintain peak condition for a couple of weeks without training intensively so I'd agree Wycombe, 3 weeks shouldn't be too much of an issue.
Get a week's training and a reserve game under his belt and he'll be sorted.
Is that too controversial ?
by Royal Lady » 10 Sep 2009 12:32
by Maguire » 10 Sep 2009 12:39
Royal Lady You've confused me now.
by Royal Lady » 10 Sep 2009 12:41
Poor Mags. Never mind. Maybe your luck will change at the weekend.MaguireRoyal Lady You've confused me now.
Not hard
by CMRoyal » 10 Sep 2009 12:47
Sun Tzu You can usually maintain peak condition for a couple of weeks without training intensively so I'd agree Wycombe, 3 weeks shouldn't be too much of an issue.
Get a week's training and a reserve game under his belt and he'll be sorted.
Is that too controversial ?
by CMRoyal » 10 Sep 2009 12:53
by Ian Royal » 10 Sep 2009 12:58
CMRoyalSun Tzu You can usually maintain peak condition for a couple of weeks without training intensively so I'd agree Wycombe, 3 weeks shouldn't be too much of an issue.
Get a week's training and a reserve game under his belt and he'll be sorted.
Is that too controversial ?
No, but it took a while geting there. Maybe when RL rolls her eyes some people get a mental image of their own missus tutting and tapping the rolling pin, and so the red mist descends. To sum up - McAnuff has or had a back injury (which he had when we signed him - not that it's irrelevant) and even if he's over that and back training, he won't be in the squad on Saturday because he hasn't yet got any reserve games under his belt.
Sorted? Good.
by Sun Tzu » 10 Sep 2009 13:02
Royal Lady So did he become "not match fit" in only three weeks then or what? You've confused me now.
by Royal Lady » 10 Sep 2009 13:08
by Sun Tzu » 10 Sep 2009 13:21
by Barry the bird boggler » 10 Sep 2009 13:40
by strap » 11 Sep 2009 16:04
andrew1957 Think we will play this one 4-2-1-3
Federici
Cummings
O'Dea (Mills has not looked match fit)
Pearce
Bertrand
Karacan
Gunnar
Sigurdsson
Kebe
Hunt
Robson-Kanu
Bench - Hamer, McAnuff, Howard, Mills, Long, Cisse, Rasiak
by woodley_royal_124 » 11 Sep 2009 16:33
by brendywendy » 11 Sep 2009 16:34
strapandrew1957 Think we will play this one 4-2-1-3
Federici
Cummings
O'Dea (Mills has not looked match fit)
Pearce
Bertrand
Karacan
Gunnar
Sigurdsson
Kebe
Hunt
Robson-Kanu
Bench - Hamer, McAnuff, Howard, Mills, Long, Cisse, Rasiak
Howard for HRK and you'd be about right I'd say. With Kebe taking no reposnibility for anything, we need a couple of old pros in the centre like Gunnar and Howard to allow Kebe to be utter shite as usual.
by leww_rfc » 11 Sep 2009 16:35
brendywendystrapandrew1957 Think we will play this one 4-2-1-3
Federici
Cummings
O'Dea (Mills has not looked match fit)
Pearce
Bertrand
Karacan
Gunnar
Sigurdsson
Kebe
Hunt
Robson-Kanu
Bench - Hamer, McAnuff, Howard, Mills, Long, Cisse, Rasiak
Howard for HRK and you'd be about right I'd say. With Kebe taking no reposnibility for anything, we need a couple of old pros in the centre like Gunnar and Howard to allow Kebe to be utter shite as usual.
saw him take responsibility for three goals, and a crunching sliding block/tackle last time we played..........
Users browsing this forum: LUX, WestYorksRoyal and 258 guests