by ZacNaloen » 19 Sep 2009 16:36
by Royal Lady » 19 Sep 2009 16:36
Thou VoiceRoyal Lady I'm not convinced Frank Lampard Snr is the best man for the job tbh.
Does he actually go to our Saturday games, or does he go and watch Junior?
by Dorset-Knob » 19 Sep 2009 16:37
Pablo Hunt on for Church
by Thou Voice » 19 Sep 2009 16:38
by Pablo » 19 Sep 2009 16:38
Dorset-KnobPablo Hunt on for Church
he's on the bench!
by Archie's penalty » 19 Sep 2009 16:38
Royal LadyThou VoiceRoyal Lady I'm not convinced Frank Lampard Snr is the best man for the job tbh.
Does he actually go to our Saturday games, or does he go and watch Junior?
No idea. But he's not exactly got a brilliant track record in management or anything has he? We need a, dare I say it, Steve Coppell type person who will mentor and advise and help coach the team. Not that I'm saying ACTUALLY Steve Coppell, but someone like him.
by Deathy » 19 Sep 2009 16:39
Royal LadyThou VoiceRoyal Lady I'm not convinced Frank Lampard Snr is the best man for the job tbh.
Does he actually go to our Saturday games, or does he go and watch Junior?
No idea. But he's not exactly got a brilliant track record in management or anything has he? We need a, dare I say it, Steve Coppell type person who will mentor and advise and help coach the team. Not that I'm saying ACTUALLY Steve Coppell, but someone like him.
by Starfish » 19 Sep 2009 16:39
by Royal Lady » 19 Sep 2009 16:40
Rawlie19Royal Lady He knew he had to cut the cloth when taking the job. If he wasn't happy with that he should have told Madejski to do one. He obviously felt he could do ok on a small budget and with younger players - seems, so far, he was wrong. But like I said, we don't have any other choice at the moment. I think we could do with someone to help Rodgers with tactics etc. I'm not convinced Frank Lampard Snr is the best man for the job tbh.
I didn't say he didn't know, but how is it his fault? If he was the one who said "all these players need to go, they're not good enough" then fair enough, but I suspect (I admit I'm not itk) that he had a directive and he's done that. Now we're all moaning that he's not good enough to take a bunch of academy players and turn them in to top Championship class players?
by Alivey » 19 Sep 2009 16:40
by Rawlie19 » 19 Sep 2009 16:40
Starfish I have often seen teams coming from 2-0 down back to 2-2, losing 3-2 in the end.
by Royal Lady » 19 Sep 2009 16:41
DeathyRoyal LadyThou Voice Does he actually go to our Saturday games, or does he go and watch Junior?
No idea. But he's not exactly got a brilliant track record in management or anything has he? We need a, dare I say it, Steve Coppell type person who will mentor and advise and help coach the team. Not that I'm saying ACTUALLY Steve Coppell, but someone like him.
Because you know what we need!
by Aeroguide » 19 Sep 2009 16:41
by FiNeRaIn » 19 Sep 2009 16:42
Aeroguide Oxford Utd. 3-0 up....Royals could be playing a local derby within two seasons .."for the Times they are a-changing"
by Royalwaster » 19 Sep 2009 16:42
Royal LadyRawlie19Royal Lady He knew he had to cut the cloth when taking the job. If he wasn't happy with that he should have told Madejski to do one. He obviously felt he could do ok on a small budget and with younger players - seems, so far, he was wrong. But like I said, we don't have any other choice at the moment. I think we could do with someone to help Rodgers with tactics etc. I'm not convinced Frank Lampard Snr is the best man for the job tbh.
I didn't say he didn't know, but how is it his fault? If he was the one who said "all these players need to go, they're not good enough" then fair enough, but I suspect (I admit I'm not itk) that he had a directive and he's done that. Now we're all moaning that he's not good enough to take a bunch of academy players and turn them in to top Championship class players?
Do you actually read other people's posts properly or what? I said, if he knew he had to get rid of players and he wasn't happy to do that, he shouldn't have taken the job. He HAS taken the job, he's bigged himself and the team up on numerous occasions, but he's not been giving us the results.
by Rawlie19 » 19 Sep 2009 16:42
Royal LadyRawlie19Royal Lady He knew he had to cut the cloth when taking the job. If he wasn't happy with that he should have told Madejski to do one. He obviously felt he could do ok on a small budget and with younger players - seems, so far, he was wrong. But like I said, we don't have any other choice at the moment. I think we could do with someone to help Rodgers with tactics etc. I'm not convinced Frank Lampard Snr is the best man for the job tbh.
I didn't say he didn't know, but how is it his fault? If he was the one who said "all these players need to go, they're not good enough" then fair enough, but I suspect (I admit I'm not itk) that he had a directive and he's done that. Now we're all moaning that he's not good enough to take a bunch of academy players and turn them in to top Championship class players?
Do you actually read other people's posts properly or what? I said, if he knew he had to get rid of players and he wasn't happy to do that, he shouldn't have taken the job. He HAS taken the job, he's bigged himself and the team up on numerous occasions, but he's not been giving us the results.
by FiNeRaIn » 19 Sep 2009 16:43
Royalwaster
What do you want him to do - come in and say "This team is useless - we'll probably get relegated?" Any good manager bigs his own team up ...
by Royalwaster » 19 Sep 2009 16:43
Aeroguide Oxford Utd. 3-0 up....Royals could be playing a local derby within two seasons .."for the Times they are a-changing"
by Pablo » 19 Sep 2009 16:43
by Royal Lady » 19 Sep 2009 16:43
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests