You're the manager - what would you do?

[Thaumagurist*]

Schards, you're looking a bit like frimmers when he refuses to answer the question about Lewis Hamilton being ungracious.

[Royalee]

I suggest he plays 1-9 for the watford game - get everyone behind the ball and little Noel Hunt up front, just in case.

I suggest you go away and learn the basics of football before ever posting on here again.

Even Mr Very Stupid of Stupidsville would have realised I was joking there Lee.

Well you've proven all too often you have no idea about football so it's difficult to tell with you.

[Royalee]

I'm still not sure where you intend this argument to go.

We can't play a conventional 4-4-2 with the available players. Or do you contend that?

I'd rather the manager fannys about with "pretty" formations until he finds one that works rather than soldiering on with a formation that definitely won't work.

I don't want it to go anywhere with you. I've absolutely no interest in your thoughts on this or any other subject.

As for Royalee, it would be nice for him to acknowledge that his comment to RL was a cheap shot and total garbage, but that's about as likely as rocking horse shit as he's not one for acknowledging he's got something wrog - despite, or may because of the fact that he gets pretty much everything wrong.

How was it a cheap shot? Time usually tells I get things right, although I'm happy to admit I'm wrong sometimes like with the Derby thing last season (although I'd like to think I have more of an idea about my own club than Derby given I see Derby play twice a season against us and then maybe once or twice above that). I don't dodge questions either, I'm very open and honest with what I think.

[winchester_royal]

I'm still not sure where you intend this argument to go.

We can't play a conventional 4-4-2 with the available players. Or do you contend that?

I'd rather the manager fannys about with "pretty" formations until he finds one that works rather than soldiering on with a formation that definitely won't work.

I don't want it to go anywhere with you. I've absolutely no interest in your thoughts on this or any other subject.

As for Royalee, it would be nice for him to acknowledge that his comment to RL was a cheap shot and total garbage, but that's about as likely as rocking horse shit as he's not one for acknowledging he's got something wrog - despite, or may because of the fact that he gets pretty much everything wrong.

An unusually petty comment from you Schards. Obviously RL has hacked into your account.

[Terminal Boardom]

How was it a cheap shot? Time usually tells I get things right, although I'm happy to admit I'm wrong sometimes like with the Derby thing last season (although I'd like to think I have more of an idea about my own club than Derby given I see Derby play twice a season against us and then maybe once or twice above that). I don't dodge questions either, I'm very open and honest with what I think.

Why are you such an arrogant twunt? You really do take the biscuit sometimes. What is this "Time usually tells I get things right" bollocks? But where I will agree with you is that you are open and honest about what you think which shouldn't be very difficult as you know 7/8ths of 3/4s of fuck all.

[Schards#2]

I'm still not sure where you intend this argument to go.

We can't play a conventional 4-4-2 with the available players. Or do you contend that?

I'd rather the manager fannys about with "pretty" formations until he finds one that works rather than soldiering on with a formation that definitely won't work.

I don't want it to go anywhere with you. I've absolutely no interest in your thoughts on this or any other subject.

As for Royalee, it would be nice for him to acknowledge that his comment to RL was a cheap shot and total garbage, but that's about as likely as rocking horse shit as he's not one for acknowledging he's got something wrog - despite, or may because of the fact that he gets pretty much everything wrong.

An unusually petty comment from you Schards. Obviously RL has hacked into your account.

Nothing to do with this thread, from previous experience, the bloke's just a cock and not worth the few seconds it takes to respond to him.

[Schards#2]

I'm still not sure where you intend this argument to go.

We can't play a conventional 4-4-2 with the available players. Or do you contend that?

I'd rather the manager fannys about with "pretty" formations until he finds one that works rather than soldiering on with a formation that definitely won't work.

I don't want it to go anywhere with you. I've absolutely no interest in your thoughts on this or any other subject.

As for Royalee, it would be nice for him to acknowledge that his comment to RL was a cheap shot and total garbage, but that's about as likely as rocking horse shit as he's not one for acknowledging he's got something wrog - despite, or may because of the fact that he gets pretty much everything wrong.

How was it a cheap shot? Time usually tells I get things right, although I'm happy to admit I'm wrong sometimes like with the Derby thing last season (although I'd like to think I have more of an idea about my own club than Derby given I see Derby play twice a season against us and then maybe once or twice above that). I don't dodge questions either, I'm very open and honest with what I think.

It's a cheap shot because, as you well know, we didn't play a conventional 4-4-2 at Peterborough.

Still awaiting your open and honest response on the 'next six games thread'

[Royalee]

What about it?

[Terminal Boardom]

What about it?

Post of the day! Schards outscharded!