by Thaumagurist* » 30 Sep 2009 11:28
by Ryn » 30 Sep 2009 11:43
by Ian Royal » 30 Sep 2009 12:15
CMRoyal In terms of producing the goods, Kebe is our top man this season. Three assists and a goal in our two wins. No wonder managers persist with the guy.
by Gus the teenage cow » 30 Sep 2009 12:29
Ryn Who was it that said you can prove anything with statistics?
by CMRoyal » 30 Sep 2009 12:35
Ian RoyalCMRoyal In terms of producing the goods, Kebe is our top man this season. Three assists and a goal in our two wins. No wonder managers persist with the guy.
Except Kebe doesn't have 3 assists, because winning a penalty doesn't count as an assist, nor does having a shot and hitting the post/having it saved and another player picking up the rebound and scoring.
Siggurdsson has 3 assists (or using your rules 4) and a goal. (plus another goal in the league cup and maybe assists too) which makes him our top man.
Great game from Kebe though.
by Royal Lady » 30 Sep 2009 13:06
by Dirk Gently » 30 Sep 2009 13:16
by Trosser » 30 Sep 2009 22:13
DeathyTrosser Royal Lady
Schards
Ideal
Royalee
Any other absentees?
You don't think, maybe, maybe they went to the game that clearly you didn't, Tosser?
by Fezza » 30 Sep 2009 22:32
by Sun Tzu » 01 Oct 2009 10:50
Ian Royal
Except Kebe doesn't have 3 assists, because winning a penalty doesn't count as an assist, nor does having a shot and hitting the post/having it saved and another player picking up the rebound and scoring.
.
by Maguire » 01 Oct 2009 11:06
Ian Royal Except Kebe doesn't have 3 assists, because winning a penalty doesn't count as an assist, nor does having a shot and hitting the post/having it saved and another player picking up the rebound and scoring
by CMRoyal » 01 Oct 2009 11:13
Sun TzuIan Royal
Except Kebe doesn't have 3 assists, because winning a penalty doesn't count as an assist, nor does having a shot and hitting the post/having it saved and another player picking up the rebound and scoring.
.
Why don't they count as 'assists' ?
Given that the concept of an 'assist' in football is pretty nebulous it's reasonable to give anyone a bit of credit for playing a significant role in the immediate run up to a goal ?
To claim it 'doesn;t count' if all you do is gain a penalty seems to simply be trying to wriggle out of recognising that a player has had an impact on a game...
by Schards#2 » 01 Oct 2009 11:18
by Rawlie19 » 01 Oct 2009 11:19
Royal Lady So sorry I wasn't on here last night, only we went to visit our baby granddaughter who was born late yesterday afternoon.
For the record, I like Kebe and stick up for him when Schards slags him off! I was gobsmacked when we heard it was 2-0 at half time, but thought history might repeat itself. When Schards told me we won 2-1, I was really pleased, obviously, because I am a Reading fan. However, we shouldn't get carried away just yet - but having said that, it sets us up nicely for Saturday, though I won't be there. My thoughts on Rodgers and the backroom staff are unchanged at the moment. I said I'd give him until January in that poll that asked the question, but I sincerely hope that I can come on here by Xmas and say how wrong I was.
Hope that's ok with you Tosser or whatever your name is.
by jollyjiminy » 01 Oct 2009 12:35
CMRoyalstrapCMRoyal In terms of producing the goods, Kebe is our top man this season. Three assists and a goal in our two wins. No wonder managers persist with the guy.
In terms of balanced reporting, he did nothing at all, (and that is actually nothing), in the Doncaster game. His contributions in his other games this season, as I understand it, was minimal. 2 halves of positive contribution in 6 games he's started this season is NOT acceptable from of our allegedly "senior" players.
Hopefully his performance in the 1st half last night will kick start his RFC career. My heart wishes it tbe so, my head (based on the previous 50 odd apps of his), suggests otherwise.
There are many on here who are willing him to succeed, but he has flattered to deceive so often that our skepticism is well founded.
Can't wait for Saturday !!!
I'd go further - I'd say he was rotten against Doncaster. Incredibly frustrating, can't control, can't head, can't finish, like Thierry Henry in clown boots. I've said this in many of the 30 or so games I've seen him play. But a lot of it is about consistency. When he gets it right, at this level he is a game winner like few others, which is why I made the point about managers persisting with him. When he hits the groove he is a 2-3 point player.
by CMRoyal » 01 Oct 2009 12:55
jollyjiminy Did you see what was going on at the Donny game though?? Time and time again Kebe was in position with a defender on him, and Cummings brought the ball up towards him but didn't release it. This gave the defenders time to double up on Kebe so he did the only thing he could do and move into the pitch meaning that Cummings could bring the ball up but was now on his own. It was all pretty disappointing but it was Cummings fault. The only thing Kebe could have done was be more mobile but this would have meant being out of position and would have required even more awareness from Cummings, and he wasn't showing enough as it was. It was all bad news, but there's no point looking at Kebe while not understanding the football that's going on around him.
by Terminal Boardom » 03 Oct 2009 22:16
by Royal Lady » 04 Oct 2009 10:53
by Royal Lady » 04 Oct 2009 11:00
by Trosser » 06 Oct 2009 21:23
Royal Lady Oh and Tosser, as for your reasons for calling yourself Trosser,
Tredder is so called because his niece, when she was little, couldn't say his proper name and so used a D instead of a V. So, why you think calling yourself Trosser has any relevance or link to his name, I don't know. I think it's you who is the "thick" one for not knowing why Tredder is so-called.
Much love anyway. Sounds like you need a hug.
Users browsing this forum: Crusader Royal, Kev Royal, Mid Sussex Royal, Royals and Racers, WestYorksRoyal and 278 guests