by Big Foot » 03 Oct 2009 21:32
by Forbury Lion » 03 Oct 2009 22:42
Thou VoiceMeMeMe what does 7.5 Million investment on club infrastructure last season entail ?.
Hotel.
It has an awesome media suite so we can declair our losses every couple of weeks or so.
DO YOU SEE?
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 05 Oct 2009 06:57
by Branfoot Out » 05 Oct 2009 07:59
by Barry the bird boggler » 05 Oct 2009 11:52
Branfoot Out I might still be missing something but has anyone successfully explained the following yet:
How do the net transfer figures add up? Is the money for players sales during the PL years included (Kitson, Shorey, Sonko etc.)? Is there a clear breakdown of this?
What exactly was the large investment made on players durin 2005/6? Lita for £1m? And?
A terrific piece of spin spin spin anyway. Love the last paragraph particularly..
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 05 Oct 2009 12:15
peterroyal76 funnelling funds to the hotel?
I think this is a big part of it.
by yappy » 05 Oct 2009 13:16
by Wycombe Royal » 05 Oct 2009 16:47
Branfoot Out IWhat exactly was the large investment made on players durin 2005/6? Lita for £1m? And?
by Yellowcoat » 05 Oct 2009 17:33
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 05 Oct 2009 19:30
brendywendyIt does leave me scratching my head though when I see the likes of Stoke (similar sized club) spending so much more on bringing in players than we ever did.
all on teh back of chairman willing to throw money away
or debts
by Branfoot Out » 05 Oct 2009 19:34
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 06 Oct 2009 07:57
by Vision » 06 Oct 2009 11:19
Harpers So Solid Crew Judging by the published accounts i make the wage bill for the two years that include the prem seasons more than £62.5million, something smells, but I doubt that the club are trying to hide money.
by Sun Tzu » 06 Oct 2009 11:46
by Wycombe Royal » 06 Oct 2009 12:07
Branfoot Out Sorry, just getting back to my first point regarding player sales during 2006-8. Are people suggesting that the £10.6 million stated by the club as being invested on players is a net figure taking into account the sales of Shorey, Kitson, Sonko etc? Or is this just the figure spent on player purchases?
by Vision » 06 Oct 2009 13:57
Sun Tzu Are these figures the football club or the holding company though ?
If they are the football club the hotel figures shouldn;t be in there (either running costs, staff costs, income, building etc etc) should they ?
strap
by Royal Lady » 06 Oct 2009 14:21
by Wycombe Royal » 06 Oct 2009 14:28
Royal Lady and like I said on that other thread, I'm surprised they can't even spell accrued! More surprised Spacey didn't pick that one up though!
by Branfoot Out » 06 Oct 2009 14:35
Wycombe RoyalBranfoot Out Sorry, just getting back to my first point regarding player sales during 2006-8. Are people suggesting that the £10.6 million stated by the club as being invested on players is a net figure taking into account the sales of Shorey, Kitson, Sonko etc? Or is this just the figure spent on player purchases?
It clearly states that the £10.6m is for the two Premiership seasons so it is unlikely they would be including the sales of players that happened after we were relegated in that figure.
by Wycombe Royal » 06 Oct 2009 14:43
Branfoot OutWycombe RoyalBranfoot Out Sorry, just getting back to my first point regarding player sales during 2006-8. Are people suggesting that the £10.6 million stated by the club as being invested on players is a net figure taking into account the sales of Shorey, Kitson, Sonko etc? Or is this just the figure spent on player purchases?
It clearly states that the £10.6m is for the two Premiership seasons so it is unlikely they would be including the sales of players that happened after we were relegated in that figure.
But they do include the Doyle, Bikey, and Hunt sales to pay off the alleged overdraft balance so surely all transfer sales for the period post-2006 need to be included?!? How else can the figures add up? You've essentially absorbed over £10 million (Kitson, Shorey, Sonko) worth of sales into the ether...
If you take into account these sales, then there should have been no problem in paying off the overdraft and no sales were necessary this close-season.
Users browsing this forum: Royality creeps In and 28 guests