by Harpers So Solid Crew » 06 Oct 2009 16:31
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 06 Oct 2009 16:36
Wycombe Royal I would hazard a guess that the money from the sales of Kitson, Shorey, Sonko disaapeared into our income that helped pay the huge wage bill we had last season, and hence why we had to offload those high earners this summer.
by Victor Meldrew » 06 Oct 2009 19:31
by Sun Tzu » 06 Oct 2009 19:57
Victor Meldrew Looking at the numbers again.
Players 42
Football Management & coaching staff 57
Admin staff 96
Isn't it all a bit top heavy on the non-playing staff?
Presumably with all the cost cutting of recent times we will one day see much reduced numbers in all areas?
I would still like to see an explanation of those massive "infrastrucure" costs at nearly £7.5 million when the tangle assets come to less than £60million.
Has anybody seen the extension to the ground or any other massive changes around the ground?
by Victor Meldrew » 06 Oct 2009 21:03
Sun TzuVictor Meldrew Looking at the numbers again.
Players 42
Football Management & coaching staff 57
Admin staff 96
Isn't it all a bit top heavy on the non-playing staff?
Presumably with all the cost cutting of recent times we will one day see much reduced numbers in all areas?
I would still like to see an explanation of those massive "infrastrucure" costs at nearly £7.5 million when the tangle assets come to less than £60million.
Has anybody seen the extension to the ground or any other massive changes around the ground?
There's a pretty chunky 3 story addition to the ground on the South West side - wrongly called a media suite but actually it houses most of the people who run the club and other things. Before it was built people were housed all over the place, some in what was no more than a broom cupboard. 100% necessary ? Possibly not, but it must make the place more efficient.
Good to hear there is some visible evidence of infrastrucure expenditure.
BTW just heard from a source that in the past has come up with accurate stuff that the sale of the club is not far off and we are talking of Asian owners and not Arabs.
Interesting to see whether they will spend money on the playing side now that the infrastructure is well up to speed.
It still sounds like a hell of a lot of coaches and admin staff to me.
Hogwood has also had a lot of work on it. Again probably not strictly necessary but the story has always been that becasue we don't play top wages we try and make sure the players are offered the best facilities.
The numbers for coaches etc would almost certainly include all the coaches down through the age groups so the comparison of player to coaches is a bit false. If you assume we run a dozen teams all told then 3 coaches per team (which woul dbe under at the top level and over at the lower end) is maybe not so excessive.
by Sun Tzu » 06 Oct 2009 21:26
by Wycombe Royal » 07 Oct 2009 10:08
Harpers So Solid CrewWycombe Royal I would hazard a guess that the money from the sales of Kitson, Shorey, Sonko disaapeared into our income that helped pay the huge wage bill we had last season, and hence why we had to offload those high earners this summer.
Last time we were there the wage bill was just under £10m, so double would be almost £20m, £11m from parachute and £10m from sales, tho of course that would not all have been recieved at the time of the sale, tho we would be receiving cash from other sales in the past, if we are to believe it does not all come up front, how you must all love finances
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 07 Oct 2009 14:33
by Wycombe Royal » 07 Oct 2009 16:57
Harpers So Solid Crew Well why not release the figure
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 07 Oct 2009 17:35
by Ian Royal » 07 Oct 2009 19:13
by Uke » 07 Oct 2009 19:52
Ian Royal Why should they bother. Give all the minute details and they get accused of trying to hide things in details and make it impossible to understand. Release a summary and keep it simple and they're trying to hide something by not giving us all the information.
Some people have made their minds up regardless what the club say. You can't accuse the club of not being open now though. What other club would have done this?
by Victor Meldrew » 07 Oct 2009 20:32
UkeIan Royal Why should they bother. Give all the minute details and they get accused of trying to hide things in details and make it impossible to understand. Release a summary and keep it simple and they're trying to hide something by not giving us all the information.
Some people have made their minds up regardless what the club say. You can't accuse the club of not being open now though. What other club would have done this?
^^ What he said
I'm sure Pompey's new owner will be regularly publishing this information in future
by Sun Tzu » 07 Oct 2009 20:34
Victor MeldrewUkeIan Royal Why should they bother. Give all the minute details and they get accused of trying to hide things in details and make it impossible to understand. Release a summary and keep it simple and they're trying to hide something by not giving us all the information.
Some people have made their minds up regardless what the club say. You can't accuse the club of not being open now though. What other club would have done this?
^^ What he said
I'm sure Pompey's new owner will be regularly publishing this information in future
Won't he have to if it is a limited company?
by Victor Meldrew » 07 Oct 2009 20:51
by Uke » 07 Oct 2009 21:02
Victor Meldrew Does ANYBODY know how it is structured?
by RoyalBlue » 07 Oct 2009 21:06
UkeVictor Meldrew Does ANYBODY know how it is structured?
Yes, the people who published them do
You don't need to know
When you fly in a plane do you demand to know where each part hasbeen sourced? And see the training records for all the mechanics who serviced the plane?
Or are you happy enough to take the word of the Airline that it's in good enough nick to fly?
by Uke » 07 Oct 2009 21:13
RoyalBlueUkeVictor Meldrew Does ANYBODY know how it is structured?
Yes, the people who published them do
You don't need to know
When you fly in a plane do you demand to know where each part hasbeen sourced? And see the training records for all the mechanics who serviced the plane?
Or are you happy enough to take the word of the Airline that it's in good enough nick to fly?
Not if it's a dodgy airline or one from certain Eastern European or African countries!!
Also, of particular relevance is the fact that various safety groups are now beginning to express concern over the way in which standards may be compromised because even previously well respected airlines are over-desperate to cut costs.
by Sun Tzu » 07 Oct 2009 21:14
UkeVictor Meldrew Does ANYBODY know how it is structured?
Yes, the people who published them do
You don't need to know
When you fly in a plane do you demand to know where each part hasbeen sourced? And see the training records for all the mechanics who serviced the plane?
Or are you happy enough to take the word of the Airline that it's in good enough nick to fly?
by BR2 » 08 Oct 2009 12:10
Sun TzuUkeVictor Meldrew Does ANYBODY know how it is structured?
Yes, the people who published them do
You don't need to know
When you fly in a plane do you demand to know where each part hasbeen sourced? And see the training records for all the mechanics who serviced the plane?
Or are you happy enough to take the word of the Airline that it's in good enough nick to fly?
I'm assuming Vic was responding to the Pompey reference - and as Pompey haven;t published anything that I've seen...
Agree with the general thrust though - I have no more need to understand th enuts an dbolt of RFC's finances than I do those of Tesco or BP. I'm a consumer, I pay my money in return for watching a game of football. If the club use some of the income they generate to do some building work, pay over the odds for a deputy second assistant groundsman etc etc then more fool them but am I especially bothered ?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests