by John Peel » 17 Oct 2009 17:22
by Deathy » 17 Oct 2009 17:23
by Ian Royal » 17 Oct 2009 17:26
by PEARCEY » 17 Oct 2009 17:27
Ian Royal Federici
Cummings, O'Dea, Mills, Bertrand
Davies, Siggurdsson, Karacan, McAnuff
Hunt, Long
Hamer, Cisse, Gunnarsson, Matejovsky, Kebe, HRK, Church
Assuming no one was injured and I could recall Davies from loan.
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 17 Oct 2009 17:30
Deathy Why try and pick?
Mills scored, so he'll be dropped. Cummings was awful, so he'll stay in... etc etc
And LOL at putting an old man with no legs at right back for a full 90.
by Terminal Boardom » 17 Oct 2009 17:32
by Ian Royal » 17 Oct 2009 17:32
PEARCEYIan Royal Federici
Cummings, O'Dea, Mills, Bertrand
Davies, Siggurdsson, Karacan, McAnuff
Hunt, Long
Hamer, Cisse, Gunnarsson, Matejovsky, Kebe, HRK, Church
Assuming no one was injured and I could recall Davies from loan.
Not much width there Ian..
by John Peel » 17 Oct 2009 17:35
Deathy And LOL at putting an old man with no legs at right back for a full 90.
by Chaney » 17 Oct 2009 17:36
by John Peel » 17 Oct 2009 17:38
Who Moved The Goalposts?Deathy Why try and pick?
Mills scored, so he'll be dropped. Cummings was awful, so he'll stay in... etc etc
And LOL at putting an old man with no legs at right back for a full 90.
Agree. Picking a team is a pointless exercise. Rodgers is giving a great impression of a manager who hasn't a clue, so why would you expect his players, in a team moulded to his shape (and in his image) to be any different?
Another deafeat beckons I'm afraid at QPR, possibly a heavy one seeing as we're now as useless in defence as we are in attack. At this rate, the home clash with Ispwich in a few weeks time will be between the bottom two.
by PEARCEY » 17 Oct 2009 17:38
by Royalee » 17 Oct 2009 17:39
by Ian Royal » 17 Oct 2009 17:41
PEARCEY ^ Agree about Kebe as an impact sub. No problem with Davies in the side but would put him more central. I'd still like Matejovsky in there but agree with you about Siggy who should certainly be in the team so its difficult to play them both. I don't rate McAnuff...never have and wouldn't play him.
Also concur re Howard...don't rate him.
by PEARCEY » 17 Oct 2009 17:42
Royalee Hamer
Bertrand
Mills
Ingimarsson
Tabb
McAnuff
Karacan
Sigurdsson
Robson-Kanu
N Hunt
Rasiak
by rg6royal » 17 Oct 2009 17:46
by I was there at Elm Park » 17 Oct 2009 17:53
Ian RoyalPEARCEY ^ Agree about Kebe as an impact sub. No problem with Davies in the side but would put him more central. I'd still like Matejovsky in there but agree with you about Siggy who should certainly be in the team so its difficult to play them both. I don't rate McAnuff...never have and wouldn't play him.
Also concur re Howard...don't rate him.
I just don't think we can afford the luxury of two wingers with only two central midfielders. But we certainly can't afford one striker.
I honestly think Matejovsky has contributed basically nothing in his time here. McAnuff has not had games as good as Kebe, but then I think he's consistently played to a better level so far overall.
How we can not play the only player we've got with multiple assists, and stick to one striker when we aren't scoring enough is beyond me.
by loyalroyal4life » 17 Oct 2009 17:56
by Spud Gun » 17 Oct 2009 18:21
by Victor Meldrew » 17 Oct 2009 18:25
by Stevie G » 17 Oct 2009 19:29
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], stealthpapes and 248 guests