by papereyes » 21 Oct 2009 17:37
by Berry » 21 Oct 2009 17:38
Archie's penalty I think there are at least three worse teams...
(22).
by brendywendy » 21 Oct 2009 17:38
papereyes Well. Including our reserves anyway.
by brendywendy » 21 Oct 2009 17:39
BerryArchie's penalty I think there are at least three worse teams...
(22).
Sorry to be negative but at the moment we have at least 3 worse teams, depending on which formation the Irish one decides to pull out of his coaching manual
by Berry » 21 Oct 2009 17:40
by Berry » 21 Oct 2009 17:41
brendywendyBerryArchie's penalty I think there are at least three worse teams...
(22).
Sorry to be negative but at the moment we have at least 3 worse teams, depending on which formation the Irish one decides to pull out of his coaching manual
you make it sound like theres been many many more than the 4-5-1, and 4-4-2 that he, and most other managers use
by brendywendy » 21 Oct 2009 17:42
by Archie's penalty » 21 Oct 2009 17:43
by brendywendy » 21 Oct 2009 17:45
Archie's penalty The plan is make everyone thing we are sh*te - get hammered and then suddenly at around 18 games in become good and start slaughtering teams.
We can get promoted yet.
by Archie's penalty » 21 Oct 2009 17:48
by brendywendy » 21 Oct 2009 17:49
by Berry » 21 Oct 2009 17:49
brendywendy yes, it was 4-5-1
which he has now pragmatically changed to 4-4-2
& the plan is to win a game.
none of which has owt to do with my comment on you sounding like you were saying we'd tried a billion different formations, and that was the reason we were shit
by Archie's penalty » 21 Oct 2009 17:50
brendywendy pardon?
by Berry » 21 Oct 2009 17:53
by Ian Royal » 21 Oct 2009 17:53
by Berry » 21 Oct 2009 17:55
Ian Royal Well done to the bald guy in the front row who picked up the ball to give to Howard for a corner late on.
Refused to give it to him 'til he'd explained "see this round thing, put it in the netty thing over there." with gestures and shouts.
Best management I've seen this season. It bloody worked as well!
by Archie's penalty » 21 Oct 2009 17:55
by brendywendy » 21 Oct 2009 17:56
Berrybrendywendy yes, it was 4-5-1
which he has now pragmatically changed to 4-4-2
& the plan is to win a game.
none of which has owt to do with my comment on you sounding like you were saying we'd tried a billion different formations, and that was the reason we were shit
No Brendy, if I said we had tried a billion different formations then there would be a billion worse teams than us, hence the use of "3" worse teams putting across the liklehood of using "3" different formations which is highly likely, got that mush????
by Berry » 21 Oct 2009 17:56
Archie's penalty I'm all posted out.
20 minutes left.
by Berry » 21 Oct 2009 17:57
brendywendyBerrybrendywendy yes, it was 4-5-1
which he has now pragmatically changed to 4-4-2
& the plan is to win a game.
none of which has owt to do with my comment on you sounding like you were saying we'd tried a billion different formations, and that was the reason we were shit
No Brendy, if I said we had tried a billion different formations then there would be a billion worse teams than us, hence the use of "3" worse teams putting across the liklehood of using "3" different formations which is highly likely, got that mush????
aye
as crystal, big man
Users browsing this forum: Biscuit goalie, Orion1871, WestYorksRoyal and 218 guests