by Ian Royal » 18 Oct 2009 19:27
by Royal With Cheese » 18 Oct 2009 19:31
by adamh4608 » 18 Oct 2009 19:35
Ian Royal Would happily see Coppell back, although I'd rather a blood and thunder manager with a bit of esperience in the short term to get us through this piss poor slump.
We have the players to survive. To be honest, I think sticking from the start of the season to the acadamy products would have brought us more success.
by Royalee » 18 Oct 2009 19:41
brendywendyRoyaleebrendywendy turning on him already royalee?
but what about all that crap you were coming out with before?
I'm not asking for him to be sacked yet, but he appears to be backtracking on what he set out to do, which I for one did not see coming and had I done I'm not sure I'd have wanted Rodgers here.
aaahhhhhh
with friends like you ...etc
by Ian Royal » 18 Oct 2009 19:49
adamh4608Ian Royal Would happily see Coppell back, although I'd rather a blood and thunder manager with a bit of esperience in the short term to get us through this piss poor slump.
We have the players to survive. To be honest, I think sticking from the start of the season to the acadamy products would have brought us more success.
we need an experienced manager,to bring the best out of our inexperienced player's, not a inexperienced manager.
and i would be glad to see coppell back
by Dirk Gently » 18 Oct 2009 19:53
by Victor Meldrew » 18 Oct 2009 19:55
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 18 Oct 2009 19:59
by winchester_royal » 25 Oct 2009 13:39
by madreadingfan » 25 Oct 2009 13:50
by Ryn » 26 Oct 2009 10:06
winchester_royal SC on the SS1 panel for the 'Pool-Scum Utd game. Didn't realise how much I missed him, talks so much sense compared to the rest.
by No Hoops » 26 Oct 2009 10:47
by Dirk Gently » 26 Oct 2009 15:07
by brendywendy » 26 Oct 2009 15:14
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 26 Oct 2009 15:15
Dirk Gently I think in the fullness of time there's going to be some major revisionism of the SC years.
by Hoop Blah » 26 Oct 2009 16:02
Harpers So Solid CrewDirk Gently I think in the fullness of time there's going to be some major revisionism of the SC years.
Unlikely as most were happy with him and how he took us where he did, and how he acted as we slid.
there are only a few that really think it was all his fault.
by Still Hate Futcher! » 26 Oct 2009 16:21
by Terminal Boardom » 26 Oct 2009 16:35
by Hoop Blah » 26 Oct 2009 16:43
Still Hate Futcher! Blah Blah Blah
by rhroyal » 26 Oct 2009 16:46
I suppose he also fluked taking Palace up and guiding them to 3rd. He did he also fluke his 2nd spell at Palace, where he kept them in Division 1 when they were in a worse state than us with relegation? And then his next spell where he guided them back to the Premiership? Then his spell at Brentford where he won promotion from Div 3 to Div 2 and the next season was only beaten on the final day by us. And what about his spell at Brighton - 12 points adrift at the bottom or so when he took over. Only went down on the final day and were top when we took him the next season.Hoop BlahHarpers So Solid CrewDirk Gently I think in the fullness of time there's going to be some major revisionism of the SC years.
Unlikely as most were happy with him and how he took us where he did, and how he acted as we slid.
there are only a few that really think it was all his fault.
As I've said before, I think Coppell got the best out of a pretty exceptional squad of players for RFC. At the same time I think he fluked the mix a bit but when we hit form his style of management was perfect for keeping it going.
When we needed to kick on and build on that success he was fatelly flawed though and a lot of what is happening now is a direct consequence of his inability to turn round poor form and to refresh an aging squad when parts of it was passed it's best.
I'm not sure what Dirk means by his comment though.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Gunny Fishcake, Mid Sussex Royal, Royals and Racers and 329 guests