by Millsy » 26 Oct 2009 22:31
by West Stand Flash » 26 Oct 2009 22:32
2 world wars, 1 world cup I know this won't be popular but I HONESTLY really enjoyed the first half.
So you can flame Rodgers as much as you like for claiming his team is enjoyable but tonight, IT WAS.
We were BLOODY GOOD and it was shocking defending that let us down.
And we REALLY need a striker.
I really wonder if all of Rodgers' problems stem from not getting the striker he wanted?
I'm confused.
by Royalee » 26 Oct 2009 22:33
2 world wars, 1 world cup I know this won't be popular but I HONESTLY really enjoyed the first half.
So you can flame Rodgers as much as you like for claiming his team is enjoyable but tonight, IT WAS.
We were BLOODY GOOD and it was shocking defending that let us down.
And we REALLY need a striker.
I really wonder if all of Rodgers' problems stem from not getting the striker he wanted?
I'm confused.
by Mike Hunt » 26 Oct 2009 22:33
by PEARCEY » 26 Oct 2009 22:33
by Chaney » 26 Oct 2009 22:34
West Stand Flash2 world wars, 1 world cup I know this won't be popular but I HONESTLY really enjoyed the first half.
So you can flame Rodgers as much as you like for claiming his team is enjoyable but tonight, IT WAS.
We were BLOODY GOOD and it was shocking defending that let us down.
And we REALLY need a striker.
I really wonder if all of Rodgers' problems stem from not getting the striker he wanted?
I'm confused.
P.R.I.C.K
by Deathy » 26 Oct 2009 22:34
by Kitson12 » 26 Oct 2009 22:38
West Stand Flash2 world wars, 1 world cup I know this won't be popular but I HONESTLY really enjoyed the first half.
So you can flame Rodgers as much as you like for claiming his team is enjoyable but tonight, IT WAS.
We were BLOODY GOOD and it was shocking defending that let us down.
And we REALLY need a striker.
I really wonder if all of Rodgers' problems stem from not getting the striker he wanted?
I'm confused.
P.R.I.C.K
by Ian Royal » 26 Oct 2009 22:38
by PEARCEY » 26 Oct 2009 22:41
Ian Royal I'd say it was shocking finishing that let us down.
No chance had with the goal. Only criticism you can make is having no one on the far post, but Tabb did have a player to mark so no blame for him. No chance for Fed and Sigs man had to get that exactly right to score.
Most improvement and best performance of the season I've seen. Keep the same 11 and Rodgers can carry on for another game. If he makes changes he should be sacked before the next game starts.
by Ian Royal » 26 Oct 2009 22:51
PEARCEYIan Royal I'd say it was shocking finishing that let us down.
No chance had with the goal. Only criticism you can make is having no one on the far post, but Tabb did have a player to mark so no blame for him. No chance for Fed and Sigs man had to get that exactly right to score.
Most improvement and best performance of the season I've seen. Keep the same 11 and Rodgers can carry on for another game. If he makes changes he should be sacked before the next game starts.
Ian. He should go now. He bought bloody Rasiak FFS. Long looks unfit. Church out of his depth. Hunt looks a shadow of the player he was. As Strap's stats reveal this is our worst start since 19 friggin 31. Yes we did play well in the first half but ulimately 10 points out of 42 is a disgrace.
by Forest Gump » 26 Oct 2009 23:00
by Mad Dog's Ghost » 26 Oct 2009 23:03
by John Peel » 26 Oct 2009 23:04
Ian Royal All the neutrals and even the Leicester fan in the pub said we'd pretty much been robbed and just needed better finishing. They also said no need to fear relegation on that display.
by SLAMMED » 26 Oct 2009 23:05
by Ian Royal » 26 Oct 2009 23:14
Mad Dog's Ghost Forest, you overlook the three or four times our defence was split open. Did you not see Fedders' point blank saves. One was right before half time. We could have lost that by more.
Yeah, we hit the post and has a few good moments .. but how many really top draw saves did their keeper make. Not many.
by floyd__streete » 26 Oct 2009 23:16
2 world wars, 1 world cup I know this won't be popular but I HONESTLY really enjoyed the first half.
by andrew1957 » 26 Oct 2009 23:26
PEARCEYIan Royal I'd say it was shocking finishing that let us down.
No chance had with the goal. Only criticism you can make is having no one on the far post, but Tabb did have a player to mark so no blame for him. No chance for Fed and Sigs man had to get that exactly right to score.
Most improvement and best performance of the season I've seen. Keep the same 11 and Rodgers can carry on for another game. If he makes changes he should be sacked before the next game starts.
Ian. He should go now. He bought bloody Rasiak FFS. Long looks unfit. Church out of his depth. Hunt looks a shadow of the player he was. As Strap's stats reveal this is our worst start since 19 friggin 31. Yes we did play well in the first half but ulimately 10 points out of 42 is a disgrace.
by rg6royal » 26 Oct 2009 23:32
by PEARCEY » 26 Oct 2009 23:32
Users browsing this forum: 72 bus, Four Of Clubs, Google [Bot] and 241 guests