by Focher » 27 Oct 2009 11:27
by Shinfield Park Royal » 27 Oct 2009 11:58
by winchester_royal » 27 Oct 2009 11:59
Shinfield Park Royal Another 3 points dropped! Yes the performance was probably the best we've seen all season, but we still managed to lose! NIgel Pearson said himself after the game that Leicester didnt play well, yet still managed to win? Now surely a relatively decent performance against a team that didnt play well should mean a minimum of a point gained?
If Rodgers somehow manages to stay until january, a minimum of 2 strikers are needed to be bought in. By strikers i dont mean the likes of Rasiak who call themselves strikers but couldnt even prove themselves at teams like southampton. Strikers who know how to put a football in the back of a net!!!
by ZacNaloen » 27 Oct 2009 12:02
by AF1 » 27 Oct 2009 12:04
by brendywendy » 27 Oct 2009 12:04
AF1 Marek was shit last night tbf, time he was farmed out.
by AF1 » 27 Oct 2009 12:05
brendywendyAF1 Marek was shit last night tbf, time he was farmed out.
by ZacNaloen » 27 Oct 2009 12:06
by brendywendy » 27 Oct 2009 12:09
AF1brendywendyAF1 Marek was shit last night tbf, time he was farmed out.
anyone got a count on the number of incomplete passes
by loyalroyal4life » 27 Oct 2009 12:21
Ian Royalloyalroyal4lifePEARCEY Ian. What the fcuck are you on??? Rasiak's performance was pitiful.
well he wasnt actually at the game so that may explain it
anyone who thinks tabb was poor needs to watch a video of Pearce's performance. how the fcuk can you put him in the team let alone captain!!
bring in a loan striker.. like marcus bent and we may well get some points (or at least goals)
cant blame the manager look above and beyond him!!
Ow, I'm cut to the quick. Come back when you're balls have dropped then have another go.
by LoyalRoyalFan » 27 Oct 2009 12:22
by RoyalBlue » 27 Oct 2009 13:34
RG30howser I just dont think that Madejski would pay out for a decent striker
So the £1.8million we were willing to shell out for Tommy Smith counts for nothing?
.
by Hoop Blah » 27 Oct 2009 13:35
RoyalBlueRG30howser I just dont think that Madejski would pay out for a decent striker
So the £1.8million we were willing to shell out for Tommy Smith counts for nothing?
.
We weren't prepared to shell that out until it was too effing late!! Funny how many times that has happened. Displays a willingness to pay without ever having to do it!
Then there is also the question of the peanuts on offer for wages which has now left us rivalling Longleat!
by RoyalBlue » 27 Oct 2009 13:38
AF1brendywendyAF1 Marek was shit last night tbf, time he was farmed out.
anyone got a count on the number of incomplete passes
Hoop BlahRoyalBlueRG30 We weren't prepared to shell that out until it was too effing late!! Funny how many times that has happened. Displays a willingness to pay without ever having to do it!
Then there is also the question of the peanuts on offer for wages which has now left us rivalling Longleat!
We had to sell before we could afford to spend that kind of money.
Should we have stumped up the cash and gambled on someone paying enough to take Hunt and Bikey off our hands? Possibly, but the reality is that isn't how the clubs run.
by PEARCEY » 27 Oct 2009 14:27
by Scarface » 27 Oct 2009 14:45
Ian Royal Right I'm actually feeling strangely positive after that. It may have something to do with winning money at the bookies (£6 profit), or it may be because that was probably the best I've seen Reading play all season. Not that that is saying a great deal.
Generally we played well, had the better possession and chances but coulnd't quite convert anything. With a team in form and confidence we'd have scored 4 or 5 IMO. I'm happy for Rodgers to get a stay of execution after that, which as many will realise is a bit of a turn around for me in recent weeks. That comes with a caveat though. He HAS to play the same 11 in the next game. More changes and he can oxf*rd off.
Federici: 8 - no chance with the goal, two great saves to deny Fryatt + another to stop Howard late on.
Tabb: 8 - yet again not a foot wrong, not a lot going forward but solid defensively
Pearce: 7 - solid defensively, one clanger that didn't matter much not great distribution
Mills: 6 - solid defensively, awful distribution... can you say HOOF.
Bertrand: 5 - ok defensively, poor going forward. Two occasions he could have broken, twice he had a heavy touch in field straight to a defender. I may be being harsh.
McAnuff: 5 - his usual self, very good in patches in the first half mostly anonymous second half. Very unlucky not to score though.
Siggurdsson: 6 - looked good but wasted out wide IMO, still better there than Howard would have been
Howard: 6 - looked quite good, but didn't contribute enough and gave the ball away to easily too often
Matejovsky: 7 - brilliant in places with excellent skill and passing vision. Still gave the ball away far too cheaply in non-through ball situations
Church: 6 - excellent young player who just hasn't quite got the finnishing we needed
Rasiak: 6 - best game I've seen for him. was a nuisance and not bad. obviously lacking confidence
Long: 6 - ok couple of nice touches nothing more
Kebe: 6 - same but with better touches and one of the worst shots I've ever seen
by weybridgewanderer » 27 Oct 2009 14:55
by brendywendy » 27 Oct 2009 17:13
by Hoop Blah » 27 Oct 2009 17:16
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 201 guests