by The Knitting Circle » 30 Oct 2009 13:38
by readingbedding » 30 Oct 2009 13:40
by Dirk Gently » 30 Oct 2009 13:41
by Shinfield Park Royal » 30 Oct 2009 13:58
by NR_Royal » 30 Oct 2009 16:09
Ideal No, they are being made to look like shit signings because they are in fact shit players.
by The Knitting Circle » 30 Oct 2009 16:11
by 1871 Royal » 30 Oct 2009 16:20
by Thomas L'Heureux » 30 Oct 2009 16:23
1871 Royal As slightly mentioned before they wouldn't have even got into the team to begin with so its pretty much irrelevant anyway.
by SteveRoyal » 30 Oct 2009 16:52
by Terminal Boardom » 30 Oct 2009 17:01
SteveRoyal Mills will shine through when given a run of games with a constant partner in defense.
McAnuff has shown glimpses of what he can achieve and will probably get better as the team improves.
Rasiak... well. I'm sure he'll be ok backup.
by 1871 Royal » 30 Oct 2009 17:17
by winchester_royal » 30 Oct 2009 17:35
1871 Royal Wouldn't that be Shane ROFLOLong TB?
by yuomi » 30 Oct 2009 17:47
by Millsy » 30 Oct 2009 17:48
by runrunrunrungilksey » 30 Oct 2009 18:12
by facaldaqui » 30 Oct 2009 18:14
by winchester_royal » 30 Oct 2009 18:36
facaldaqui Compared to now, we had an extraordinary range of players available to us after January last season. On top pf Doyle, Hunt, and Lita, we also had Kitson and Little. At the back we still had Hahnemann and Bikey, but defence wasn't really the problem. If that forward line couldn't score, why would having McAnuff and Rasiak instead of Little and Kitson have made any difference?
by readingbedding » 30 Oct 2009 18:37
by 1871 Royal » 30 Oct 2009 19:25
winchester_royal1871 Royal Wouldn't that be Shane ROFLOLong TB?
There aren't 2 L's in Long 1871.
by Fezza » 30 Oct 2009 19:36
Users browsing this forum: 78royal, Bing [Bot], Royals and Racers, stealthpapes and 184 guests