by Archie's penalty » 31 Oct 2009 14:54
by Ian Royal » 31 Oct 2009 14:54
winchester_royalIan Royal Didn't know he was injured and would much rather O'Dea came in than calamity Ivar.
Jesus christ. So bring in an unproven loan player instead of our most experienced defender, who also happens to be club captain?
by Ian Royal » 31 Oct 2009 14:55
Archie's penalty Btw is this the least Rodgers has changed the team yet from one game to the next?
by Archie's penalty » 31 Oct 2009 14:55
Ian Royalwinchester_royalIan Royal Didn't know he was injured and would much rather O'Dea came in than calamity Ivar.
Jesus christ. So bring in an unproven loan player instead of our most experienced defender, who also happens to be club captain?
No bring in a loan player who has made fewer mistakes and has better pace than Ivar, under whom we have had our worst run of defeats this season and conceeded masses of goals.
Not really difficult to understand is it?
by Archie's penalty » 31 Oct 2009 14:56
Ian RoyalArchie's penalty Btw is this the least Rodgers has changed the team yet from one game to the next?
No unchanged from Preston to M'boro
by winchester_royal » 31 Oct 2009 14:56
Ian Royalwinchester_royalIan Royal Didn't know he was injured and would much rather O'Dea came in than calamity Ivar.
Jesus christ. So bring in an unproven loan player instead of our most experienced defender, who also happens to be club captain?
No bring in a loan player who has made fewer mistakes and has better pace than Ivar, under whom we have had our worst run of defeats this season and conceeded masses of goals.
Not really difficult to understand is it?
by Focher » 31 Oct 2009 14:57
Archie's penalty Go hard you Royals!!!
by wolsey » 31 Oct 2009 14:57
Archie's penalty Happy with that apart from maybe no O'Dea for Pearce (but then it's good to maintain continuity amongst the back four even if Pearce is poo).
Also want to know why Kebe is not on the bench.
Otherwise looks good. Go hard you Royals!!!
Oh and Pearcey - me too!
by Archie's penalty » 31 Oct 2009 14:58
winchester_royal Yes it is. Ivar is widely thought of as our best defender. Just because you seem to have developed an irrational hatred of him on the back of a couple of games where he's still a bit rusty, it doesn't make it a bad decision by Rodgers.
by Ian Royal » 31 Oct 2009 14:58
by PEARCEY » 31 Oct 2009 14:59
Ian Royal He's been in decline since our relegation season. We haven't kept a clean sheet in his 4.5 appearances for us. In fact we've conceeded on average 2 goals a game. He was dire against QPR and has less pace than me.
Ivar is not our best defender any more. He used to be fantastic. Now he is not.
by Archie's penalty » 31 Oct 2009 15:00
by cmonurz » 31 Oct 2009 15:01
by Ian Royal » 31 Oct 2009 15:02
PEARCEYIan Royal He's been in decline since our relegation season. We haven't kept a clean sheet in his 4.5 appearances for us. In fact we've conceeded on average 2 goals a game. He was dire against QPR and has less pace than me.
Ivar is not our best defender any more. He used to be fantastic. Now he is not.
Come off it Ian. An arthritic with a serious bladder problem is quicker than you
by Badger Finger » 31 Oct 2009 15:02
by PEARCEY » 31 Oct 2009 15:02
Ian RoyalPEARCEYIan Royal He's been in decline since our relegation season. We haven't kept a clean sheet in his 4.5 appearances for us. In fact we've conceeded on average 2 goals a game. He was dire against QPR and has less pace than me.
Ivar is not our best defender any more. He used to be fantastic. Now he is not.
Come off it Ian. An arthritic with a serious bladder problem is quicker than you
My point stands
by Ian Royal » 31 Oct 2009 15:04
Archie's penalty Thanks for the info Wolsey.
So a first rational selection by Rodgers - like it. If things go well today I may have gained a little respect for the man.
Have a sneaky feeling we may win this. Church to get a couple.
Oh and Ian let's just see how it goes today.
by Ian Royal » 31 Oct 2009 15:06
by Upper West Ginger » 31 Oct 2009 15:07
cmonurz I do hope Kebe is injured (a minor one), I'd hate to think Rodgers had tactically left him out.
by The Knitting Circle » 31 Oct 2009 15:08
Users browsing this forum: Brum Royal, Dirk Gently, Jammy Dodger, stealthpapes, WestYorksRoyal and 294 guests