by Dirk Gently » 11 Nov 2009 13:10
by Ryn » 11 Nov 2009 14:14
Dirk Gently Sadly, the majority of supporters still don't give a tinker's cuss about debt or ownership - they want the moon on a stick and they want it NOW! - without caring who's paying fro it, where the money's coming from or what the long-term implications are.
by (.)Boobies(.) » 11 Nov 2009 14:26
RynDirk Gently Sadly, the majority of supporters still don't give a tinker's cuss about debt or ownership - they want the moon on a stick and they want it NOW! - without caring who's paying fro it, where the money's coming from or what the long-term implications are.
Good post.
The current recession was built on the back of this attitude, and the football world is likely to follow suit.
by Terminal Boardom » 11 Nov 2009 14:31
by Dirk Gently » 11 Nov 2009 14:38
by rhroyal » 11 Nov 2009 15:18
Imagine if one of the recent clubs in trouble such as Leeds, Leicester or Southampton had truly gone under and ceased to exist, a-la Aldershot. It would have shown the world of football that things need to calm down. Maybe one day it will happen to a high profile club and it will be to the benefit of all - apart from the 100k or so fans they have.Dirk Gently Perhaps this time round they might just learn - also, for the first time ever, the regulatory authorities and governments are looking at financial governance and debts, so I think the planets are lined up for changes at long last.
IMHO one of the problems is that no-one has really gone out of business. Clubs tend to go into administration, take their 10 points as a slap on the wrist, and carry on as before - no-one seems to take administration as the serious, potentially fatal, thing it ought to be. Even the clubs who did properly fold (Aldershot, Halifax, Scarborough, Newport) are back in a slightly different way but working their way up the pyramid.
Perhaps we need a big club to properly go out of business before common sense takes over. It'll be horrible for their supporters, of course, but perhaps we do need a sacrifice for the greater good of all.
by Terminal Boardom » 11 Nov 2009 16:28
by Mike Hunt » 12 Nov 2009 01:47
I was there at Elm ParkDirk GentlyVision Looking at the recent announcements of Glasgow Rangers and Newcastle fans groups I wonder what their view and subsequent expectaions would be if they ever did gain control.
What is more relevant are the proposals Gartside of Bolton is going to put to the Premier League meeting this week. This is for Premier League 2, which would include Celtic and Rangers and would have NO relegation. Also, it's unlikely that the 38 English clubs included would be the top 38 by league position - expect Leeds, Norwich & Charlton to be invited, and Blackpool dumped out with the "have-nots".
The natural response is to say "relax, it'll never happen" but i can see some good reasons that this one will happen. Be afraid for the future of football - be very afraid!
According to BBC Sport:
However, Gartside, the driving force behind the revamp, has tweaked the original plans to include promotion and relegation to and from the dual-tier league, while the two Scottish clubs would initially be invited to join the lower tier.
by Ryn » 12 Nov 2009 07:49
Terminal Boardom The football authorities, and Murdoch's Sky empire, will never allow a massive club to fold. They have too much of a vested interest to allow something like that to happen.
by Stranded » 12 Nov 2009 08:17
RynTerminal Boardom The football authorities, and Murdoch's Sky empire, will never allow a massive club to fold. They have too much of a vested interest to allow something like that to happen.
Why would Murdoch give a sh*t exactly? For every Newcastle going down, there is a Man City Arab plaything on the up.
The Prem consists of 20 teams and whether they are all rich or all cash-strapped, they will all always have a fan base, and people willing to pay to watch them on TV.
by BR2 » 12 Nov 2009 09:35
by Dirk Gently » 12 Nov 2009 10:17
Mike Hunt Would Reading be a part of this 38 team comp ?
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 12 Nov 2009 10:27
by BR2 » 12 Nov 2009 10:38
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe So would a two tiered PRem see the money shared round more?
I could see a benifit to there being no relegation and there there's less pressure to achieve in the short term.
Would be a massive kick in the bollox for all the other clubs though...
by Dirk Gently » 12 Nov 2009 10:44
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe So would a two tiered PRem see the money shared round more?
I could see a benifit to there being no relegation and there there's less pressure to achieve in the short term.
Would be a massive kick in the bollox for all the other clubs though...
by Terminal Boardom » 12 Nov 2009 10:55
by brendywendy » 12 Nov 2009 10:57
Dirk GentlySmoking Kills Dancing Doe So would a two tiered PRem see the money shared round more?
I could see a benifit to there being no relegation and there there's less pressure to achieve in the short term.
Would be a massive kick in the bollox for all the other clubs though...
They always said that it'd never happen because giving more money to Tier 2 would mean that Tier 1 clubs would have to have less money, and they'd never go for that.
Where Gartside has been clever is by working out that bringing the Scottish Clubs in will increase the total value of the TV deal, and that could be used to raise Tier 2 revenue as well as keeping Tier 1 revenue the same.
Also, the way things have been going recently, more and more PL clubs have been in danger of relegation, and so they'd bemire likely to go for this now than they would have a few years ago.
by M-U-R-T-Y » 14 Nov 2009 16:59
by Terminal Boardom » 14 Nov 2009 18:12
M-U-R-T-Y Mooney and Henry score for their respective clubs.
by Hungerford Bee » 15 Nov 2009 08:20
M-U-R-T-Y Mooney and Henry score for their respective clubs.
Users browsing this forum: UpThePrem and 266 guests