by finbarr » 08 Dec 2009 22:46
by Big Foot » 08 Dec 2009 23:00
by AthleticoSpizz » 08 Dec 2009 23:07
by Schards#2 » 08 Dec 2009 23:08
by handbags_harris » 08 Dec 2009 23:09
by rg6royal » 08 Dec 2009 23:09
by Row Z Royal » 08 Dec 2009 23:14
handbags_harris And now some reality after the thread opener.
This was an atrocious performance, a capitulation just before half time. Federici beaten twice at his near post TWICE AGAIN, although the third was a bit of a pearler tbf. The fourth was called as son as Moses got the ball, but where the oxf*rd was the covering defender for the most obvious ball placement that everyone could see?! In open play we struggled to create anything at all, although Rasiak should be kicking goalposts after his scuff just after the opener. Apart from that, set pieces were our only outlet.
I've almost had it with this clown in charge. The result was called half an hour before kickoff when I found out that Sigurdsson had been dropped for Gunnarsson. Did the f*ckin clown not learn from QPR?! Player of the month Sigurdsson dropped?! Two defensive midfielders at home who so obviously can't play together, a pairing so ruthlessly exposed at QPR?! One striker we have for the next game again. The clown in charge does not help himself at all. Normal service resumed then, needless changes, followed by ridiculously soft goals conceded down to poor goalkeeping or woefully inadequate defensive play, a midfield lacking in quality and fitness, and an attack that leaves a lot to be desired.
It must be said that a Coppell team rarely lost at home by conceding four goals. A Coppell team, when it didn't play particularly well, at least had the defensive foundations to have the potential to gain a draw. A Coppell team rarely shipped three goals at this level, let alone four. This ol' boy currently in charge, well he may speak reasonably well but it's all the same guff about DNA, journey,s and the latest fad, game management. Well how did we manage the game today the Brendan? Appallingly you utter c*nt, absolutely appallingly. Because we're so obviously not good enough it is unreal. Playoffs
Sack him.
by Hozza » 08 Dec 2009 23:14
rg6royal I think we can all see Gunnar is past it and we need to look into bringing a new striker and midfielder in in January.
by floyd__streete » 08 Dec 2009 23:15
by percy freeman fanclub » 08 Dec 2009 23:17
by M U R T Y » 08 Dec 2009 23:17
handbags_harris A Coppell team rarely shipped three goals at this level, let alone four.
by Row Z Royal » 08 Dec 2009 23:18
percy freeman fanclub thought we were a bit unlucky to lose.
by Chaney » 08 Dec 2009 23:18
by Gus the teenage cow » 08 Dec 2009 23:18
handbags_harris And now some reality after the thread opener.
This was an atrocious performance, a capitulation just before half time. Federici beaten twice at his near post TWICE AGAIN, although the third was a bit of a pearler tbf. The fourth was called as son as Moses got the ball, but where the oxf*rd was the covering defender for the most obvious ball placement that everyone could see?! In open play we struggled to create anything at all, although Rasiak should be kicking goalposts after his scuff just after the opener. Apart from that, set pieces were our only outlet.
I've almost had it with this clown in charge. The result was called half an hour before kickoff when I found out that Sigurdsson had been dropped for Gunnarsson. Did the f*ckin clown not learn from QPR?! Player of the month Sigurdsson dropped?! Two defensive midfielders at home who so obviously can't play together, a pairing so ruthlessly exposed at QPR?! One striker we have for the next game again. The clown in charge does not help himself at all. Normal service resumed then, needless changes, followed by ridiculously soft goals conceded down to poor goalkeeping or woefully inadequate defensive play, a midfield lacking in quality and fitness, and an attack that leaves a lot to be desired.
It must be said that a Coppell team rarely lost at home by conceding four goals. A Coppell team, when it didn't play particularly well, at least had the defensive foundations to have the potential to gain a draw. A Coppell team rarely shipped three goals at this level, let alone four. This ol' boy currently in charge, well he may speak reasonably well but it's all the same guff about DNA, journey,s and the latest fad, game management. Well how did we manage the game today the Brendan? Appallingly you utter c*nt, absolutely appallingly. Because we're so obviously not good enough it is unreal. Playoffs
Sack him.
by Row Z Royal » 08 Dec 2009 23:20
Chaney well you joined in July and this is your first post?..what a load of balls, we played like a team destined for the drop without a leader on and off the pitch, the only time we looked like getting anything from the game is when we equalised and for approx 2 minutes after our 2nd goal, my player marks.
Federici.3 Simon Shepherd mark 2..surely Hamer is better
Tabb.5 not a full back, badly found out in all quarters by Moses
Ingarmarsson .4 sad to see the decline of a once great servant to our club.
Pearce.5 extra mark because he scored, but if he is the future then we are doomed.
Bertrand.5 not really noticed which says it all really
Kebe.6 certainly not the worse player on the pitch, gave us some hope late in the game.
Mattyovski.5 went missing for long periods
Gunarsson.5 20 minutes before I noticed he was playing
Cisse.6 tried hard..all i can say really
Macinuf.7 once again our best player but lacked support.
Rasiak.1 surely the worse striker ever to wear the hoops..absolute donkey.
by Focher » 08 Dec 2009 23:22
by Royalee » 08 Dec 2009 23:23
by AthleticoSpizz » 08 Dec 2009 23:24
Chaney Rasiak.1 surely the worse striker ever to wear the hoops..absolute donkey.
by RoyalBlue » 08 Dec 2009 23:28
Hozzarg6royal I think we can all see Gunnar is past it and we need to look into bringing a new striker and midfielder in in January.
Add to that a new goalkeeper, right back and left winger and we might get somewhere.
by John Madejski's Wallet » 08 Dec 2009 23:30
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 188 guests