by winchester_royal » 13 Dec 2009 14:19
by PEARCEY » 13 Dec 2009 14:34
Dirk GentlySmoking Kills Dancing Doe Coppell will come back for 6 months.....
Not a chance of that - never in a million, million years....
by PEARCEY » 13 Dec 2009 14:38
floyd__streete Good response, fair play to you fella.
by Ian Royal » 13 Dec 2009 14:41
winchester_royalfloyd__streete
Yeah thank god for you winchester_royal; the Peter Ustinov of HNA.
I may not be the most eloquent, or knowing poster on HNA, but I'd like to think I am at the very least rational, and able to look furhter than simple results.
Rodgers is 1/2 way through what some, myself included, have dubbed a 'revolution'. In a short time period we have seen players like Sig and HRK emerge from the shackles placed on the younger players during Coppell's time, and seen an obvious improvement in the style of football being played. Getting rid now, and bringing in a long ball merchant like Hart, who has never consistently convinced as a manager, could ruin everything that we have built in the last six months.
We are improving, admittedly at a slow rate, but we are, the players are fully behind him, and whilst we are unable to invest in a significant way, it would be silly to get rid.
by facaldaqui » 13 Dec 2009 15:08
by loyalroyal4life » 13 Dec 2009 15:18
winchester_royalsandmanthefruits I want him to go. I want sir steve back. I think BR has actually brought in some good players but hasn't the nous to get them working together.
Each day BR remains in charge will mean the damage he is doing to the club will get worse.
SSC should be brought back without dills & downs (dills obviously has a new job). SSC with Murts & Parky as his support anyone ?
Coppell ain't coming back . Paul Hart in please.
LOL. That's exactly why I want BR to stay.
by loyalroyal4life » 13 Dec 2009 15:22
by weybridgewanderer » 13 Dec 2009 15:32
facaldaqui I voted 'yes', even though Rodgers depresses me, simply because common decency requires that we give him a chance--and he hasn't blown that chance yet.
by SteveRoyal » 13 Dec 2009 15:36
by Alan Partridge » 13 Dec 2009 15:42
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 13 Dec 2009 15:55
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 13 Dec 2009 16:01
by Terminal Boardom » 13 Dec 2009 16:19
by winchester_royal » 13 Dec 2009 16:19
Ian Royal
You've proven yourself irrational by saying there is no possibility of us getting relegated.
Impossible to take anything you say seriously now.
by sandman » 13 Dec 2009 16:22
winchester_royalIan Royal
You've proven yourself irrational by saying there is no possibility of us getting relegated.
Impossible to take anything you say seriously now.
I do love it when you take everything I say out of context.
If you actually read my comment in question, I said I do not believe that we will be relegated, never said there wasn't a possibility, just that I do not think it is.
TBH IR, you change your mind often than you change your underwear, so sorry if I don't give a oxf*rd what you say,
by winchester_royal » 13 Dec 2009 16:24
sandmanwinchester_royalIan Royal
You've proven yourself irrational by saying there is no possibility of us getting relegated.
Impossible to take anything you say seriously now.
I do love it when you take everything I say out of context.
If you actually read my comment in question, I said I do not believe that we will be relegated, never said there wasn't a possibility, just that I do not think it is.
TBH IR, you change your mind often than you change your underwear, so sorry if I don't give a oxf*rd what you say,
Says the bloke who rashly accuses people of racism.
by sandman » 13 Dec 2009 16:27
sandmanwinchester_royalIan Royal
You've proven yourself irrational by saying there is no possibility of us getting relegated.
Impossible to take anything you say seriously now.
I do love it when you take everything I say out of context.
If you actually read my comment in question, I said I do not believe that we will be relegated, never said there wasn't a possibility, just that I do not think it is.
TBH IR, you change your mind often than you change your underwear, so sorry if I don't give a oxf*rd what you say,
Says the no gender specified human who rashly accuses people of racism .
by Archie's penalty » 13 Dec 2009 16:43
+1. That's why I voted no. Should he stay? Probably but things are worrying at present and am not sure Rodgers has it in him to turn it around.rob the royalIan Royal Way too simplistic a poll.
Yeah, was just about to say the same thing actually. A fair few of those people putting yes probably aren't behind him anymore, but don't see any alternative or think that they'd rather risk sticking with rodgers than having the upheaval of a new manager.
But I guess it gives us a rough idea how many people have completely lost patience with him and absolutely hate his guts.
by Dirk Gently » 13 Dec 2009 16:56
PEARCEYDirk GentlySmoking Kills Dancing Doe Coppell will come back for 6 months.....
Not a chance of that - never in a million, million years....
Wrong. Wasn't it you that said Lita and Kitson couldn't play together again...take a look at the Middlesboro team sheet these days.
I certainly wouldn't rule out Coppell returning short-term.
by Ian Royal » 13 Dec 2009 17:44
winchester_royalIan Royal
You've proven yourself irrational by saying there is no possibility of us getting relegated.
Impossible to take anything you say seriously now.
I do love it when you take everything I say out of context.
If you actually read my comment in question, I said I do not believe that we will be relegated, never said there wasn't a possibility, just that I do not think it is.
TBH IR, you change your mind often than you change your underwear, so sorry if I don't give a oxf*rd what you say,
winchester_royal I really do not think relegation is a possibiltiy.
Users browsing this forum: royals6719, Tinpot Royal, UpThePrem and 248 guests