But I have been told [by one who might be ITK] that his contract allows him £12,000 per week. He is [allegedly] our 2nd highest paid player.
When on loan we only pay £7k - the rest being covered by the team playing him. So, we are paying him more not to play than most are getting to actually play.
Could it be true?
In this crazy world it might just be.
Without doubt many will decry this - but the source 'should be good'
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)