by BonBoh » 01 Jan 2010 14:19
by winchester_royal » 01 Jan 2010 14:21
John Peel People are conflating two issues here. Anyone who thinks Mr Mad should go without a buyer in place is quite rightly an idiot. You try running 17 companies in the worst recession since the war.
The board is another matter. Some incredibly bad decisions have been made and as supporters we quite rightly want to have a say. I can't see a problem with that. It doesn't make you a moron.
by Terminal Boardom » 01 Jan 2010 14:23
John Peel People are conflating two issues here. Anyone who thinks Mr Mad should go without a buyer in place is quite rightly an idiot. You try running 17 companies in the worst recession since the war.
The board is another matter. Some incredibly bad decisions have been made and as supporters we quite rightly want to have a say. I can't see a problem with that. It doesn't make you a moron.
by Once were Biscuitmen » 01 Jan 2010 14:27
by Sarah Star » 01 Jan 2010 14:37
by Terminal Boardom » 01 Jan 2010 14:38
Once were Biscuitmen The board is two people appointed by Mr M. To all intents and purposes he IS the board.
Anybody who wants to buy him out knows the address or maybe you could start one of those pointless fan campaigns- a la Liverpool- to buy the club.
None of you will though because it's easy to moan on the internet but quite hard to manage 17 companies through a recession.
by Terminal Boardom » 01 Jan 2010 14:43
Sarah Star So the players aren't good enough, the owner isn't rich enough, the fans aren't protesting enough and it's the board that has to go
This is a joke, isn't it?
by RoyalBlue » 01 Jan 2010 14:58
Once were Biscuitmen The board is two people appointed by Mr M. To all intents and purposes he IS the board.
Anybody who wants to buy him out knows the address or maybe you could start one of those pointless fan campaigns- a la Liverpool- to buy the club.
None of you will though because it's easy to moan on the internet but quite hard to manage 17 companies through a recession.
by facaldaqui » 01 Jan 2010 15:06
by Royalee » 01 Jan 2010 15:10
facaldaqui We'd be bought by idiots, asset stripped, and go straight down the plughole.
by Murts-is-Lej » 01 Jan 2010 15:35
by working class hero » 01 Jan 2010 16:49
facaldaqui So you're saying you want him to sell, no matter who to? We'd be bought by idiots, asset stripped, and go straight down the plughole.
by working class hero » 01 Jan 2010 16:51
Just tell me, please, what you think forcing SJM out of the club (like you could do that anyway) would achieve? Who is going to take over, who is going to put shed loads of money in? I don't think you've thought this through.
by glass half full » 01 Jan 2010 16:59
by Fluff » 01 Jan 2010 17:04
Terminal Boardom Winterland, San Francisco. 14 January 1978
Madejski Stadium, Reading. Any time since May 2009
Anyone spot the connection? Answers on a postcard...
by Franchise FC » 01 Jan 2010 18:07
Blue_Elm It will be a peaceful protest I can assure you and I'm sure after being told that the cloth needs to be cut even more in the program before the game, you'll join in too.
If not, your not really that big a fan
by Royal Lady » 01 Jan 2010 18:09
Blue_ElmRoyal Lady I'm only sorry I'm going to miss this game - half a dozen (if that) people will effectively make 20,000 RFC fans look like utter tools. If you bothered to read these reads Blue Elm, or whatever your name is, you'd realise that the vast majority of us, whilst not being in the least bit happy about our position, can all see quite clearly that SJM walking now, without an investor in place, would be suicide for this club.
Just tell me, please, what you think forcing SJM out of the club (like you could do that anyway) would achieve? Who is going to take over, who is going to put shed loads of money in? I don't think you've thought this through.
Its not the case of getting Madejski out. Thats not mine, or anyone elses intention. The intention is this. We need change, if we dont get change we're going down and we've slipped so far that its heartbreaking for fans of this club. We can see this club going further downhill and into the mire unless halted soon
by RoyalBlue » 01 Jan 2010 18:20
Royal LadyBlue_ElmRoyal Lady I'm only sorry I'm going to miss this game - half a dozen (if that) people will effectively make 20,000 RFC fans look like utter tools. If you bothered to read these reads Blue Elm, or whatever your name is, you'd realise that the vast majority of us, whilst not being in the least bit happy about our position, can all see quite clearly that SJM walking now, without an investor in place, would be suicide for this club.
Just tell me, please, what you think forcing SJM out of the club (like you could do that anyway) would achieve? Who is going to take over, who is going to put shed loads of money in? I don't think you've thought this through.
Its not the case of getting Madejski out. Thats not mine, or anyone elses intention. The intention is this. We need change, if we dont get change we're going down and we've slipped so far that its heartbreaking for fans of this club. We can see this club going further downhill and into the mire unless halted soon
If you want to "sack the board" you quite clearly want Madejski out. You say you want change. I'll ask you again, WHO do you think is going to come in and suddenly take over if Madejski walks?
glass half full Buying Football Club in current financial climate = high/low risk 'investment'. *
*Delete as applicable
by Franchise FC » 01 Jan 2010 18:30
RoyalBlue Absolutely no idea who but what's so different about that?
When we wanted Waller out, we didn't realise Captain Bob was going to appear over the horizon and we didn't know that Roger Smee would come along to thwart him (with the help of others). When Smee had to give the club up to concentrate on his other business interests (Madejski please note!), we didn't know that Madejski was going to appear. Have Gold and Sullivan found a club yet (might as well keep with the publishing and there's more money in porn than cars!)?
How many clubs have actually ever ended up without a chairman/owner?
Doesn't necessarily have to be bought as an investment and at least the effects of the cost cutting are likely to be reducing the price each week!
by brendywendy » 01 Jan 2010 18:33
Franchise FCRoyalBlue Absolutely no idea who but what's so different about that?
When we wanted Waller out, we didn't realise Captain Bob was going to appear over the horizon and we didn't know that Roger Smee would come along to thwart him (with the help of others). When Smee had to give the club up to concentrate on his other business interests (Madejski please note!), we didn't know that Madejski was going to appear. Have Gold and Sullivan found a club yet (might as well keep with the publishing and there's more money in porn than cars!)?
How many clubs have actually ever ended up without a chairman/owner?
Doesn't necessarily have to be bought as an investment and at least the effects of the cost cutting are likely to be reducing the price each week!
Hang on - what reason would you buy the club for ? If it's not as an investment, then you may as well flush the dosh down the toilet.
Which multi-millionaire is going to throw their money away - unless of course they happen to be a Reading fan. I'm struggling to think of many of these.
Users browsing this forum: Clyde1998 and 208 guests