by M-U-R-T-Y » 03 Jan 2010 15:57
by facaldaqui » 03 Jan 2010 15:59
by Franchise FC » 03 Jan 2010 16:00
by rhroyal » 03 Jan 2010 16:01
by Franchise FC » 03 Jan 2010 16:01
rhroyal I rated his performance too. There was one delightful pass from the back out wide in the first pass. Can't remember if it reached The Sig or McAnuff.
by rg6royal » 03 Jan 2010 16:07
by Terminal Boardom » 03 Jan 2010 16:42
by skipper » 03 Jan 2010 16:46
Terminal Boardom All he needs is a decent right back and a CD partner with some pace. Add a fully fit Stretch and we have a half decent back line.
by Maguire » 03 Jan 2010 16:54
by M-U-R-T-Y » 03 Jan 2010 16:56
by Terminal Boardom » 03 Jan 2010 17:00
skipperTerminal Boardom All he needs is a decent right back and a CD partner with some pace. Add a fully fit Stretch and we have a half decent back line.
Could we not bring back Rosenior? Would currently be better than having Gunnarsson at right back.
by skipper » 03 Jan 2010 17:03
Terminal BoardomskipperTerminal Boardom All he needs is a decent right back and a CD partner with some pace. Add a fully fit Stretch and we have a half decent back line.
Could we not bring back Rosenior? Would currently be better than having Gunnarsson at right back.
I was saying yesterday at the game that the "removal" of the likes of Murty, Harper and Rosenior were less to do with money and more to do with how they would have reacted to the nonsense that we endured since the start of the season. They were moved on to shut them up. Can you really imagine Murts and Harps being happy with the way things have been going?
by Royalwaster » 03 Jan 2010 17:08
M-U-R-T-Y I saw a lot of people slating him on here last night, I can't really fathom why. I thought he had a more than solid game against one of the best forwards in the world. He was quicker than Ingimarsson, and hit some decent balls forward.
He needs more games. An extended run in the first team would do him well, I think.
by Terminal Boardom » 03 Jan 2010 17:10
by Ian Royal » 03 Jan 2010 17:12
by SteveRoyal » 03 Jan 2010 17:24
by juanpablo » 03 Jan 2010 17:29
SteveRoyal looks like a more reliable Bikey...
by John Peel » 03 Jan 2010 17:37
by M-U-R-T-Y » 03 Jan 2010 17:48
by Focher » 03 Jan 2010 17:57
M-U-R-T-Y Him and Pearce are both players with potential, and obviously they need games to realise that potential. Both have different qualities, Mills is quicker than Pearce and would add something different to the backline than the past-it Ingimarsson does. It just seems logical to have him and Pearce as first choice centre backs.
Users browsing this forum: Richard and 251 guests