by Thaumagurist* » 03 Jan 2010 20:29
by The 17 Bus » 03 Jan 2010 20:34
by AthleticoSpizz » 03 Jan 2010 20:34
by Arch » 04 Jan 2010 00:04
The 17 Bus "deliberating hugging people in the crowd."
and they say shakespeare could ultimately be written by chimps. thank god i lived in a cardboard box and learned.
by Barry the bird boggler » 04 Jan 2010 07:13
Thaumagurist* I see that both players in today's game between Wet Sham and Arse celebrated their goals by deliberating hugging people in the crowd.
The BBC seems to say that they weren't booked. Is this correct? If it is, then how can this be? Simon Church was booked for something like this and yet when it's between those two, the referee decides to ignore it.
by Big Foot » 04 Jan 2010 09:47
by TBM » 04 Jan 2010 10:35
Thaumagurist* I see that both players in today's game between Wet Sham and Arse celebrated their goals by deliberating hugging people in the crowd.
The BBC seems to say that they weren't booked. Is this correct? If it is, then how can this be? Simon Church was booked for something like this and yet when it's between those two, the referee decides to ignore it.
TBM .
Also, what i dont understand is why players get booked for taking their shirt off? - what is deemed so offensive about taking a shirt off to celebrate a goal?
by TBM » 04 Jan 2010 11:04
AF2TBM .
Also, what i dont understand is why players get booked for taking their shirt off? - what is deemed so offensive about taking a shirt off to celebrate a goal?
regardless of the rights or wrongs of the rule it remains prolly the most straightforward and unequivocal ones to abide by and i cant understand or sympathise with players who continue to flout it.
by sheshnu » 04 Jan 2010 11:23
TBM True, i just see whats so bad about it?
by yappy » 04 Jan 2010 11:48
by Stranded » 04 Jan 2010 11:49
TBMThaumagurist* I see that both players in today's game between Wet Sham and Arse celebrated their goals by deliberating hugging people in the crowd.
The BBC seems to say that they weren't booked. Is this correct? If it is, then how can this be? Simon Church was booked for something like this and yet when it's between those two, the referee decides to ignore it.
Cos the ref was a cock, in the Bristol game - there is nothing wrong with celebrating a goal and the refs seem too keen to dish out cards for it.....a simple word in the ear to the player would be enough.
Also, what i dont understand is why players get booked for taking their shirt off? - what is deemed so offensive about taking a shirt off to celebrate a goal?
by Hoop Blah » 04 Jan 2010 12:10
Stranded It's a bookable offence to leave the pitch without consent hence why Church was correctly booked - his sending off was his own fault for getting booked whilst still on the bench. If the players weren't booked yesterday the ref will get a bollocking from his assessor.
by Jerry St Clair » 04 Jan 2010 12:12
TBM
Also, what i dont understand is why players get booked for taking their shirt off? - what is deemed so offensive about taking a shirt off to celebrate a goal?
by PEARCEY » 04 Jan 2010 12:15
Thaumagurist* I see that both players in today's game between Wet Sham and Arse celebrated their goals by deliberating hugging people in the crowd.
The BBC seems to say that they weren't booked. Is this correct? If it is, then how can this be? Simon Church was booked for something like this and yet when it's between those two, the referee decides to ignore it.
by TBM » 04 Jan 2010 12:30
PEARCEYThaumagurist* I see that both players in today's game between Wet Sham and Arse celebrated their goals by deliberating hugging people in the crowd.
The BBC seems to say that they weren't booked. Is this correct? If it is, then how can this be? Simon Church was booked for something like this and yet when it's between those two, the referee decides to ignore it.
My thoughts as well. No consistency really. I think Church was booked presumably because the ref thought he was the player who jumped into the crowd when it was clearly not him.
What I don't understand is why the club didn't therefore appeal that second yellow card which resulted in his ban.
by T.R.O.L.I. » 04 Jan 2010 12:42
by FORSTERS_RIGHT_FOOT » 04 Jan 2010 13:27
T.R.O.L.I. I asked Dirk about the shirt taking off rule a while back and I'm pretty sure he said it's due to the expansion of the "global brand" of football into countries where bared torsos are taboo.
by PEARCEY » 04 Jan 2010 14:58
TBMPEARCEYThaumagurist* I see that both players in today's game between Wet Sham and Arse celebrated their goals by deliberating hugging people in the crowd.
The BBC seems to say that they weren't booked. Is this correct? If it is, then how can this be? Simon Church was booked for something like this and yet when it's between those two, the referee decides to ignore it.
My thoughts as well. No consistency really. I think Church was booked presumably because the ref thought he was the player who jumped into the crowd when it was clearly not him.
What I don't understand is why the club didn't therefore appeal that second yellow card which resulted in his ban.
You cant appeal a yellow card....
by Dirk Gently » 04 Jan 2010 19:34
TBMAF2TBM .
Also, what i dont understand is why players get booked for taking their shirt off? - what is deemed so offensive about taking a shirt off to celebrate a goal?
regardless of the rights or wrongs of the rule it remains prolly the most straightforward and unequivocal ones to abide by and i cant understand or sympathise with players who continue to flout it.
True, i just see whats so bad about it?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests