by Far Canal » 23 Jan 2010 20:04
by Dirk Gently » 23 Jan 2010 20:07
by PEARCEY » 23 Jan 2010 20:14
Far Canal As I see it, life after Brendan has produced the following:
1. Mills in the side at the expense of Pearce and looking good.
2. Ivar back to form in his favoured position of left centre back.
3. A proper right back in the team in Andy Griffin.
4. Jem Karacan playing regularly in the side and looking good.
5. Four strikers to choose from in Church, Rasiak, Thorvaldsson and Long and goal scoring prospects considerably improved.
6. Jimmy Kebe dropped to the bench and proving to be a useful impact sub when needed.
7. Adam Federici looking like a proper keeper instead of a liability.
8. Gylfi Sigurdsson looking better than either in the middle or on the wing.
9. Jobi McAnuff, after a two or three game dip, back to form.
10.Bryn Gunnarsson looking like he can manage a game a week (but not two).
I realise that other factors are involved, but this is too much to be coincidence.
Well done so far Brian, just get a few league points and the job must be yours.
by The Cap » 23 Jan 2010 20:14
by Ian Royal » 23 Jan 2010 20:35
by strap » 23 Jan 2010 20:39
Dirk Gently Plus the move back to a consistent 4-4-2, with minor changes only to suit the opposition, rather than wholesale changes each match.
Disappointing that the players didn't seem able to adapt, but at least we're recognising their limitations and playing to them.
by Avon Royal » 23 Jan 2010 22:36
by Ian Royal » 23 Jan 2010 22:39
Avon Royal Just out of interest, how do Brendan and Brian's points per game records compare?
by Avon Royal » 23 Jan 2010 22:44
Ian RoyalAvon Royal Just out of interest, how do Brendan and Brian's points per game records compare?
Identical if you're comparing the same number of games from the start of their reign. Full league record then Rodgers will be better. McDermott's is currently 0.5 points per game. But then 4 games really isn't enough to really be worth working it out for.
by floyd__streete » 24 Jan 2010 12:06
by LoyalRoyal22 » 24 Jan 2010 12:24
by Maguire » 24 Jan 2010 12:25
by LoyalRoyal22 » 24 Jan 2010 12:27
Maguire LOL@more of your shit propaganda
Best three players this season have been Gylfi, Bertrand, and McAnuff. The former was introduced to the first team by Brendan Rodgers. The latter two were brought into the club by, err, Brendan Rodgers.
Since Rodgers was sacked we haven't won a single league game.
"Jimmy Kebe dropped to the bench" - yeah like that never happened before
"A proper right back in Andy Griffin" - yes, and you all said he was shit after Forest away.
"Mills in the side" - again, never seen that happen before
"Increased striking options" - what? Church was given his proper chance by Rodgers. Long's been injured and is shit anyway. Rasiak was signed by Rodgers. And the new guy was brought in by...well you can work it out for yourselves
Oh and I might as well mention again that we haven't won a single league match under McDermott.
I actually think B-Mac comes across well and really hope he succeeds, but the revisionist agenda-driven shit that gets written on here is unbelievable.
by Ian Royal » 24 Jan 2010 12:35
Maguire LOL@more of your shit propaganda
Best three players this season have been Gylfi, Bertrand, and McAnuff. The former was introduced to the first team by Brendan Rodgers. The latter two were brought into the club by, err, Brendan Rodgers.
"A proper right back in Andy Griffin" - yes, and you all said he was shit after Forest away.
"Mills in the side" - again, never seen that happen before
by winchester_royal » 24 Jan 2010 12:41
by Rex » 24 Jan 2010 12:45
by Ian Royal » 24 Jan 2010 12:52
royalexile Perhaps the reality is exactly that Mags, naturally the team has evolved under Rodgers. The results are running to the same (currently) form, but there are signs that the team are gelling together more. This could possibly also have happened under Rodgers. It's all speculation.
Perhaps Rodgers set the bar to high and oversold his intended targets, therefore setting himself up to fail. his strategy came across as a long term plan over X seasons. It's just that there was almost a daze of uncertainty amongst the team where communication levels on the pitch and the experience of working together never came together fast enough. Almost long the lines of : Plan A never worked , revert to plan B , shit that's not working either, now what.
by Quagmire » 24 Jan 2010 13:05
Far Canal As I see it, life after Brendan has produced the following:
1. Mills in the side at the expense of Pearce and looking good.
2. Ivar back to form in his favoured position of left centre back.
3. A proper right back in the team in Andy Griffin.
4. Jem Karacan playing regularly in the side and looking good.
5. Four strikers to choose from in Church, Rasiak, Thorvaldsson and Long and goal scoring prospects considerably improved.
6. Jimmy Kebe dropped to the bench and proving to be a useful impact sub when needed.
7. Adam Federici looking like a proper keeper instead of a liability.
8. Gylfi Sigurdsson looking better than ever either in the middle or on the wing.
9. Jobi McAnuff, after a two or three game dip, back to form.
10.Bryn Gunnarsson looking like he can manage a game a week (but not two).
I realise that other factors are involved, but this is too much to be coincidence.
Well done so far Brian, just get a few league points and the job must be yours.
by Maguire » 24 Jan 2010 13:05
Ian Royal On another note first 7 games in charge form (discounting Burton who were so far below the quality of our reserves it's a worthless comparison.
Rodgers: DLDLLWD (Rodgers last 7 games: WDWLWLD)
BMcD: DDLDWLW
So even on Rodgers best form BMcD is only converting one draw to a win from matching it. And arguably against stronger opposition. He just needs to translate his cup results into the league. Which I expect him to start doing in the next month.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 24 Jan 2010 13:06
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Kev Royal, RG30, Royals and Racers and 257 guests