exileinleeds Just a thought of a question. Surely HMRC will have no problem working out who owns/can appoint an administrator. They only have to trace the payment of stamp duty that surely has been paid on all the share transfers this season?...
UkeMr Optimist That's an interesting point. Does teh club already have to be mathematically certain of relegation for the points deduction to be carried forward to the next season?
If Pompey are say 8 or points adrfit from safety in two weeks time with 9 games to go and virtually down anyway before the 9 points deduction, surely it is not going to make any real difference to take the points in March and would be more of a punishment for them to start in the CCC -10 in August with a further -10 if they are still in administration by the start of the season?
That would be cruel as Pompey will have some hope of staying up and beating the drop, thus prolonging their pain...
Oh go on then!
Portsmouth need £14m just to get to the end of next month and are carrying debts of £86m, it emerged in the high court today as the club faced "serious questions" over the validity of the process by which it was placed into administration.
Her Majesty's Customs and Revenue yesterday made public figures included in the report prepared by the insolvency specialist Vantis at the behest of the high court last month, as it challenged the administrators to prove the validity of the owner Balram Chainrai's mortgage over the club and its assets.
Lawyers told the court that Portsmouth's debts stood at £86m, £8m higher than the figure given by the administrator on Sunday. They valued the squad at £21m, £17m less than the estimate of the chief executive, Peter Storrie, last week.
HMRC called for a full investigation into how Portsmouth's "succession of owners have allowed such enormous debts to accrue". "We say there are serious questions that arise and require full investigation as to what financial dealings there have been between the various different owners of the club and between the club and its owners," said Gregory Mitchell QC, representing HMRC. "At the moment, everything is shrouded in mystery."
HMRC, believed to be owed up to £18m, said it had three main areas of concern: whether the administrators had been validly appointed, whether they would act with "complete independence" and the funding of the club during administration. Mitchell said that there was "a real concern as to whether administration is feasible at all" and it was revealed that the club's assets exceed its liabilities by £65m.
Chainrai, who last month became the fourth owner this season and on Friday placed it into administration, has promised to continue funding the club. But Mitchell outlined concerns that debts to unsecured creditors could rise while Chainrai would recover all his money in full. Chainrai's £17m loan to his predecessor Ali al-Faraj is secured on two mortgages on the club and the ground and HMRC want to see documentary evidence that the money went in. As revealed by the Guardian last month, the Vantis report also outlined plans for the club to sell Fratton Park for £10m and then lease it back for £1.2m a year.
Setting out HMRC's argument, Mitchell also questioned the close links between the administrator, Andrew Andronikou of UHY Hacker Young, and Chainrai's company Portpin Ltd. Both use the same solicitor, Balsara & Co, which recently took over the club's client account from Fuglers. Portsmouth's own banking facilities were withdrawn several months ago.
"We understand that any funds will come from Mr Chainrai and our concern is that there should be a full and independent investigation of the position and the transactions between the club and Mr Chainrai," he said.
Mitchell said although HMRC welcomed the administration if properly funded, there were concerns about where funds to meet the debts will come from. He also called for more information on Portpin Ltd. Chainrai claimed he lent the club £17m as a straightforward business transaction after being approached by Faraj, who had earlier paid £1 to buy the club from Sulaiman al-Fahim when his promised investment failed to emerge.
"They [the administrators] have been appointed by a company, Portpin Ltd, that is registered in the British Virgin Islands and we know very little about Portpin," said Mitchell.
Adjourning the case until the week beginning 15 March, Justice Norris said: "A shadow has been cast over the existing appointment of the administrators and that shadow should be removed as quickly and cheaply as possible."
Portsmouth, bottom of the league, are almost certain to be deducted nine points for going into administration. The matter was due to be on the agenda attoday's Premier League board meeting but discussions were postponed while the implications of yesterday's court proceedings were digested.
Andronikou said he was confident of being able to supply the documentation to satisfy the court in a fortnight's time. "It's a case of exchanging documents. It's a pity it's had to happen in this forum," he said.
Pseud O'Nym I'm rather surprised by how relaxed the administrator is about the case. HMRC are not only challenging his appointment on the grounds of Chainrai's authority, but also that Andronikou may not be independent which, if proved, could surely severely impact his professional future.
Victor Cattermole's Endeavour Plan consortium ......said it is still interested in buying it (Pompey) but a spokesman for the Hong Kong businessman Chainrai, queried Cattermole's claim that there was no need to put the club into administration. Unfortunately, the proof of funds were from an unrecognised financial institution, and, when we asked for proof of funds from a recognised bank, he was unable to provide it.' "He is represented by a 23 yr old. When we asked for a meeting at his offices, he said that he didn't have an office, but we could meet at his Dad's home".
Lawyers told the court that Portsmouth's debts stood at £86m, £8m higher than the figure given by the administrator on Sunday. They valued the squad at £21m, £17m less than the estimate of the chief executive, Peter Storrie, last week.
HMRC, believed to be owed up to £18m
Ideal What if we beat villa, get drawn to face Poorfsmuff who by then are bankrupt?
Europe's top clubs have succeeded in delaying the full introduction of Uefa's new financial fair play rules.
The rules will apply in 2015 instead of 2012 and will govern the amount of debt clubs can accrue, with European bans a possible punishment if they are broken.
The European Club Association agreed clubs must break even over a three-year period, without relying on large cash injections from rich owners.
ECA chairman Karl-Heinz Rummenigge said: "This is a huge achievement."
Rummenigge told reporters at the Soccerex business convention that 93 clubs from 53 countries had attended the ECA's General Assembly in Manchester and were unanimously agreed on the proposals.
"After only two years of existence, the European Club Association has managed, together with Uefa, to set measures that will shape the future of European club football into a more responsible business and ultimately a more sustainable one," continued Rummenigge.
Uefa will assess clubs' finances over a rolling three-year period to ensure they comply with their new financial fair play rules before they are allowed to take part in the Champions League or Europa League.
It means rich owners will have to have an equitable stake in a club rather than loaning it vast sums of money.
Dirk Gently Victor Cattermole's Endeavour Plan consortium ......said it is still interested in buying it (Pompey) but a spokesman for the Hong Kong businessman Chainrai, queried Cattermole's claim that there was no need to put the club into administration. Unfortunately, the proof of funds were from an unrecognised financial institution, and, when we asked for proof of funds from a recognised bank, he was unable to provide it.' "He is represented by a 23 yr old. When we asked for a meeting at his offices, he said that he didn't have an office, but we could meet at his Dad's home".
Pseud O'NymDirk Gently Victor Cattermole's Endeavour Plan consortium ......said it is still interested in buying it (Pompey) but a spokesman for the Hong Kong businessman Chainrai, queried Cattermole's claim that there was no need to put the club into administration. Unfortunately, the proof of funds were from an unrecognised financial institution, and, when we asked for proof of funds from a recognised bank, he was unable to provide it.' "He is represented by a 23 yr old. When we asked for a meeting at his offices, he said that he didn't have an office, but we could meet at his Dad's home".
I trust you're not trying to imply that Cattermole is not to be taken seriously:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/soccer-football/news/article.cfm?c_id=86&objectid=10628994&pnum=0
in 1995 he was ordered by the High Court to move out of Erskine College, a former Catholic girls' school in Wellington. He had signed a $1m contract to buy the place but never paid, even though he moved into the priest's flat on the grounds. It took the court order to get him out.
Cattermole's history could raise questions under English Premiership rules that owners must be "a fit and proper person".
It lists a raft of rules and offences which are barriers to ownership.
BBC Sport OTHER GOSSIP
Portsmouth will be offered a staggering £32m rescue deal from the Premier League to pay their tax bill and avoid going bust this season.
Full story: Daily Mirror
BBC Sport OTHER GOSSIP
Portsmouth will be offered a staggering £32m rescue deal from the Premier League to pay their tax bill and avoid going bust this season.
Full story: Daily Mirror
Pseud O'Nym What would happen to the money if Pompey were liquidated though? This years TV money plus two years parachute payments are due to Pompey after all, albeit not yet. So presumably the PL would have to at least pay the receiver a portion of the money.
Users browsing this forum: Royality creeps In and 58 guests
