by SWLR » 11 Mar 2010 10:05
by John Madejski's Wallet » 11 Mar 2010 10:07
Big Foot Hallelujah! Someone else with the EXACT same opinion as me, have said it the last few games and will say it again but what does Howard offer that Matejovsky doesn't? At least Matejovsky would play the occasional killer pass and with Long and Kebe (perhaps even Church) on fire and with pace to burn, let's bring him in for Howard for Saturday please.
by Armadillo Roadkill » 11 Mar 2010 10:08
by John Madejski's Wallet » 11 Mar 2010 10:11
Maguire Oh one more thing - I see people describing the Arsenal lad's goal as "lucky", "flukely", "a poked finish" etc.
Thought it looked a pretty skillz finish from where I was sat if i'm honest.
by brendywendy » 11 Mar 2010 10:16
by jumpers for goalposts » 11 Mar 2010 10:37
FiNeRaIn First half I thoroughly enjoyed, flukey goal by derby with their first shot on goal and we deserved to be 2-1 up at the break. Sending off killed the game and it was horrible to watch. We came out second half appallingly and thought we could play with no tempo and score at will, very complacent and very poor attitude from our players. When the opposition are down to 10 men with a midfielder in goal you want to put them under severe pressure and keep the tempo up - the opposition have one less man and will tire a lot quicker. Quite why we were pottering around and hoofing the ball forward every now and then I don't know. Howard was horrendous and has to be a candidate to be dropped after a couple of bad games now, can't believe Ivar started when Zurab has proven he's a class above also. I really hope BMD isn't going to get into the coppell habit of playing long term players out of loyalty as ivar is not in there on merit at the moment. He once again made the easy things look hard by misplacing comfortable headers and slicing passes all over the shop. Woeful against villa as has been said the other day as well.
Who was at fault for their goal, didn't see it.
Happy with the 4-1 win, sets us up nicely but if it comes down to goal diff at the end of the season we'll wonder why our players were so half arsed against a team on the ropes. Kind of wish derby never had a man sent off. Not a great performance by any means but 4-1 on paper is solid.
Fed 6 - didn't do a lot wrong
Bertrand 6 - decent finish, steady all round
Griffin 5- Poorest game for us so far
Mills 5 - passing was pretty wayward and didn't inspire the defence as much as recent games
Ivar 4- does the basics wrong consistently, the crowd hold their breath every time the ball goes near him. Why is he even playing when we have ZK?
Kebe 8- very dangerous again, looking like a solid winger
Tabb 8 - midfield dynamo, gets about the pitch, creates and defends, played well
Howard 4 - useless, looked lost out there and nearly cost us with a woeful dummy in the middle of the park. What sort of role was he even supposed to be playing?
Sig - 5 - below par, few iffy passes, shooting way off and well below par in general. The new love child so even when he plays poorly he still gets credit on BBCRB.
Rasiak -7 Did well, contributed some good link up play and looked dangerous
Long 8 - Great goal, good touch and pace, really looking a good striker at the moment. Deserves a lot of credit.
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 11 Mar 2010 10:44
by Armadillo Roadkill » 11 Mar 2010 10:51
by Lower West » 11 Mar 2010 10:54
floyd__streete Lowest league crowd in many years, 14,000 which proves that the Reading public are losing faith in the McDermott regime.
by bigshaka'away' » 11 Mar 2010 11:17
by brendywendy » 11 Mar 2010 11:29
by Wycombe Royal » 11 Mar 2010 11:42
by Wimb » 11 Mar 2010 11:48
brendywendy an a wise old calm head who wasnt going to just keep lumping forward.
plus resting players for sat
by Negative_Jeff » 11 Mar 2010 13:25
Armadillo Roadkill Howard ends up doing what Harper did only without the constant waving - he fills the gaps, covers the ground, harasses people, makes himself available at every throw in and corner. It's the sort of job that managers love a player for doing well but that (excuse me if I belittle anyone here) those that maybe don't enjoy the whole shape and rhythm of the game but live for crunching tackles and fast-flowing moves may not notice, and so undervalue.
Tabb my MOTM, by the way.
by Sarah Star » 11 Mar 2010 13:27
Negative_JeffArmadillo Roadkill Howard ends up doing what Harper did only without the constant waving - he fills the gaps, covers the ground, harasses people, makes himself available at every throw in and corner. It's the sort of job that managers love a player for doing well but that (excuse me if I belittle anyone here) those that maybe don't enjoy the whole shape and rhythm of the game but live for crunching tackles and fast-flowing moves may not notice, and so undervalue.
Tabb my MOTM, by the way.
Every now and again on here someone lets the cat out of the bag and shows he understands football. Actually if you could combine Harper`s fitness and athleticism with Howard`s brain and feet you would have some player.
Older supporters may remember John Collins who had great vision but far beyond what he was physically capable of.
by Sun Tzu » 11 Mar 2010 13:28
by rabidbee » 11 Mar 2010 13:47
by Wycombe Royal » 11 Mar 2010 14:13
Sun Tzu I'm happy to accept his decision to play Howard is another good one.
by ZacNaloen » 11 Mar 2010 14:19
by FiNeRaIn » 11 Mar 2010 15:03
John Madejski's WalletMaguire Oh one more thing - I see people describing the Arsenal lad's goal as "lucky", "flukely", "a poked finish" etc.
Thought it looked a pretty skillz finish from where I was sat if i'm honest.
'greed
I thought that was quite a class goal. The guy had to change his stride and set himself up nicely for it. Well executed
///and i was bored senseless in the 2nd half
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 257 guests