by Rex » 15 Mar 2010 16:23
by seahawk10 » 15 Mar 2010 16:54
by Wimb » 15 Mar 2010 17:08
by Royal Lady » 15 Mar 2010 17:10
by papereyes » 15 Mar 2010 17:10
SpaceCruiserDeadlock Napoleon decreed that there should be a full investigation into Snowball's activities. With his dogs in attendance he set out and made a careful tour of inspection of the farm buildings, the other animals following at a respectful distance. At every few steps Napoleon stopped and snuffed the ground for traces of Snowball's footsteps, which, he said, he could detect by the smell. He snuffed in every corner, in the barn, in the cow-shed, in the henhouses, in the vegetable garden, and found traces of Snowball almost everywhere. He would put his snout to the ground, give several deep sniffs, and exclaim in a terrible voice, "Snowball! He has been here! I can smell him distinctly!" and at the word "Snowball" all the dogs let out blood-curdling growls and showed their side teeth.
Is that from Animal Farm?!?
by Rex » 15 Mar 2010 17:17
by RoyalChicagoFC » 15 Mar 2010 17:29
Starferz This[...]was sent to me by a friend of mine who knows about my being on HNA? from time to time.
by RobRoyal » 15 Mar 2010 17:34
PlasticRoyale Whilst it's all very well that his on field form has improved i'm slightly concerned about Shane's mathematical ability if he can be swayed by amateurish statistical analysis
by West_Reading » 15 Mar 2010 17:37
by Tredder » 15 Mar 2010 17:43
by PEARCEY » 15 Mar 2010 18:01
by Gus the teenage cow » 15 Mar 2010 18:04
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 15 Mar 2010 18:15
by FiNeRaIn » 15 Mar 2010 18:19
Gus the teenage cow link to the article directly or it's not true
starfishers has history of fabrication in this department
by Gus the teenage cow » 15 Mar 2010 18:20
FiNeRaInGus the teenage cow link to the article directly or it's not true
starfishers has history of fabrication in this department
You're the Irish one, find out off some contacts or something.
by Ian Royal » 15 Mar 2010 18:43
by Rex » 15 Mar 2010 19:02
Ian Royal To be fair to his knockers... He was pretty shit apart from early March 09 - late April 2009 and January 2010 - now.
We can write off the period between as down to a combination of Rodgers, injury, team form and weight. He looks a different quality of player now. That doesn't necessarily make people who said he was rubbish wrong.
He's come on more than I could imagine, but he's not exactly proven himself fully yet. He's had a period of good form and a period of excellent form. Both pretty short. And he still hasn't proved he can get 15+ over the course of a season....
I can't help thinking what a player he could have been for us these last couple of years with plenty of first team experience down the league whilst we were in the Prem.
by Snowball » 15 Mar 2010 19:02
Ian Royal To be fair to his knockers... He was pretty shit apart from early March 09 - late April 2009 and January 2010 - now.
We can write off the period between as down to a combination of Rodgers, injury, team form and weight. He looks a different quality of player now. That doesn't necessarily make people who said he was rubbish wrong.
He's come on more than I could imagine, but he's not exactly proven himself fully yet. He's had a period of good form and a period of excellent form. Both pretty short. And he still hasn't proved he can get 15+ over the course of a season....
I can't help thinking what a player he could have been for us these last couple of years with plenty of first team experience down the league whilst we were in the Prem.
by Ian Royal » 15 Mar 2010 19:13
SnowballIan Royal To be fair to his knockers... He was pretty shit apart from early March 09 - late April 2009 and January 2010 - now.
We can write off the period between as down to a combination of Rodgers, injury, team form and weight. He looks a different quality of player now. That doesn't necessarily make people who said he was rubbish wrong.
He's come on more than I could imagine, but he's not exactly proven himself fully yet. He's had a period of good form and a period of excellent form. Both pretty short. And he still hasn't proved he can get 15+ over the course of a season....
I can't help thinking what a player he could have been for us these last couple of years with plenty of first team experience down the league whilst we were in the Prem.
How often did Doyle have long barren periods? He got to 18 goals and then was barren for months.
by RoyalChicagoFC » 15 Mar 2010 19:14
royalexile Moobs not knockers.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 183 guests