by Ian Royal » 28 Mar 2010 19:27
by Archie's penalty » 28 Mar 2010 19:39
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 28 Mar 2010 19:41
by SHORT AND CURLY » 28 Mar 2010 19:45
by Terminal Boardom » 28 Mar 2010 19:49
by SLAMMED » 28 Mar 2010 21:41
Terminal Boardom The question is "Could we go for automatic promotion". I answered YES. If you are entering a competition you should do so with the intention of winning it.
by Ian Royal » 28 Mar 2010 21:53
Terminal Boardom The question is "Could we go for automatic promotion". I answered YES. If you are entering a competition you should do so with the intention of winning it.
by Terminal Boardom » 28 Mar 2010 22:06
Ian RoyalTerminal Boardom The question is "Could we go for automatic promotion". I answered YES. If you are entering a competition you should do so with the intention of winning it.
You should do so with the intention of performing as well as you can. That isn't necessarily winning it, because everyone doesn't start on a equal level.
by Ian Royal » 28 Mar 2010 22:12
Terminal BoardomIan RoyalTerminal Boardom The question is "Could we go for automatic promotion". I answered YES. If you are entering a competition you should do so with the intention of winning it.
You should do so with the intention of performing as well as you can. That isn't necessarily winning it, because everyone doesn't start on a equal level.
Without wanting to appear pedantic, everyone starts on 0 points, but I do see your point.
by 1960 » 29 Mar 2010 11:15
by Forbury Lion » 29 Mar 2010 11:57
Plus no screw ups at home to Plymouth and away to Luton.Smoking Kills Dancing Doe 106 plus or nothinggggggggggggg.
by RobRoyal » 29 Mar 2010 13:34
by CMRoyal » 29 Mar 2010 13:43
by RoyalChicagoFC » 29 Mar 2010 15:32
CMRoyal I think it can have a psychological effect though, can't it? I reckon Gary Johnson's days were numbered at Bristol City from the moment he heralded an early-season short run of form with the statement that they should accept nothing less than automatic promotion.
by Biscuit » 29 Mar 2010 16:06
by Ian Royal » 29 Mar 2010 18:17
Biscuit I think an important point in this debate is the quality of teams likely to come down from the Premier League. With the financial situation of a lot of clubs approaching meltdown, next season could be the first for a while without any real yo-yo clubs. For that reason, it would be much better to see Hull get relegated than West Ham.
by The Cap » 29 Mar 2010 18:31
didn't see the Saints final, but on the SSN highlights they said that Antonio played well. Is he still ours? If so, another forward to consider.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 233 guests