by gonesy » 28 Apr 2010 22:40
by leww_rfc » 28 Apr 2010 23:59
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Apr 2010 01:25
gonesy Just read this on getreading. Bit of a shocker after today's news
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 29 Apr 2010 07:09
by Messiah » 29 Apr 2010 09:46
by Mr Optimist » 29 Apr 2010 11:27
by 1871 Royal » 29 Apr 2010 11:28
by Messiah » 29 Apr 2010 11:36
Mr Optimist Or could it be a case of giving him a deal so that we get a reasonable fee for him from Southampton?
by Mr Optimist » 29 Apr 2010 11:39
by songvip » 29 Apr 2010 11:43
by Messiah » 29 Apr 2010 11:45
Mr Optimist I thought the contract was an option RFC could chose to take up, which presumably he agreed to when we signed him in late 2008. My guess is that he would be a free agent this summer otherwise and we'd get bugger for him.
by TBM » 29 Apr 2010 11:51
MessiahMr Optimist I thought the contract was an option RFC could chose to take up, which presumably he agreed to when we signed him in late 2008. My guess is that he would be a free agent this summer otherwise and we'd get bugger for him.
We would have got compensation due to his age.
by Wycombe Royal » 29 Apr 2010 11:54
TBMMessiahMr Optimist I thought the contract was an option RFC could chose to take up, which presumably he agreed to when we signed him in late 2008. My guess is that he would be a free agent this summer otherwise and we'd get bugger for him.
We would have got compensation due to his age.
But thats only if we decided to offer him a contract (and he rejects it)........if we just thought he wasn't good enough, we would release him and then he's free to sign for anyone.
by Messiah » 29 Apr 2010 11:58
by Stranded » 29 Apr 2010 12:01
Messiah I always thought that anyone under the age of 23 (is that right?) and out of contract meant you still got a compensation payment?
by TBM » 29 Apr 2010 12:01
Messiah I always thought that anyone under the age of 23 (is that right?) and out of contract meant you still got a compensation payment?
by Wycombe Royal » 29 Apr 2010 12:20
TBMMessiah I always thought that anyone under the age of 23 (is that right?) and out of contract meant you still got a compensation payment?
but 6 months before the contract ends other teams can also offer him a deal, if he accepts and is under 23 then compensation is paid.
by TBM » 29 Apr 2010 12:32
Wycombe RoyalTBMMessiah I always thought that anyone under the age of 23 (is that right?) and out of contract meant you still got a compensation payment?
but 6 months before the contract ends other teams can also offer him a deal, if he accepts and is under 23 then compensation is paid.
That is also incorrect. You can only do that with trasnfers involving players playing under a different football association.
by Wycombe Royal » 29 Apr 2010 12:42
TBMWycombe RoyalTBM but 6 months before the contract ends other teams can also offer him a deal, if he accepts and is under 23 then compensation is paid.
That is also incorrect. You can only do that with trasnfers involving players playing under a different football association.
Its not incorrect though
Its May 30th for English clubs (ie, end of the season)
by SLAMMED » 29 Apr 2010 12:50
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 196 guests