by papereyes » 13 Jun 2010 18:54
by papereyes » 13 Jun 2010 19:00
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 13 Jun 2010 19:09
papereyes and yes, I am aware that he's not comparing like with like there.
someone, somewhere plotted the ranked population against FIFA ranking and its apparently a lot more correlated than one would imagine. I do wonder what result you'd get with other measurements - GDP per capita etc.
If I could get the stats (200 odd countries ... ) in an easily manipulatable form, I'd have a play.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 13 Jun 2010 19:11
Royal RotherRev Algenon Stickleback H That would put us at a country of 40 million football fans - the same as Argentina.
Interesting post but that is way way off.
by papereyes » 13 Jun 2010 19:16
by Ian Royal » 13 Jun 2010 19:18
Rev Algenon Stickleback H2 world wars, 1 world cupStranded The difference I think 2WW was alluding too was that the emphasis is put on a lot of team sports in this country and as such we are decent at most of them, football, rugby, cricket...but as we don't focus completely on one it does have a knock on effect on the talent pool (as in a lot of cases the best kids growing up were good at all 3).. add to that a fairly substandard level of coaching at youth level and you have the problem why we will only ever be decent at best.
Yep stranded.
And Rev, 1 in 5 being into rugby is a not insignificant. We're losing strong fit players to this awful classist, size-exclusivist, boring joke of a brutish technique-less game. (haha what a sentence). You take 1 in 5 at random out of Germany's squad and see what effect that has for example.
as said already, other countries do play other sports too. Maybe an additional problem with have these days is just that kids are so damn fat in the UK these days. I reckon we lose far more potential players to obesity than any competing sport.I know for a fact that in many countries on the continent players are technically superior becase of the way they play form a very young age i.e. tiny enclosed yards with tiny chalk goals drawn on walls where ball skills and preise shooting are paramount. Here we send our kids out into big pitches aiming at full sized goals - great for educating about the 11-a-side game but doing no favours for ball skills. Just another possible factor.
It would be interesting to compare teams of 8 years olds from England with other countries, and see if there's much difference in the style of play at that age.
It is something of a myth though that the likes of Argentina and Brazil pluck kids from the slums or the beaches as almost ready-made stars. They've all gone through academy training from a young age. The way we play, on the large fields, playing dozens of tournaments every year, doesn't help in any way though.
by Royal Rother » 13 Jun 2010 19:26
Rev Algenon Stickleback HRoyal RotherRev Algenon Stickleback H That would put us at a country of 40 million football fans - the same as Argentina.
Interesting post but that is way way off.
Argentina's population in 2009 was apparently 40,134,425
by Hoop Blah » 13 Jun 2010 19:28
Ian Royal Part of the problem early on is that good players are encouraged to win games solo and ignore teamplay, certainly with the weaker players.
When they're no longer a cut above the players they are against (attackers usually favoured over defenders at young ages) they don't know how to work as a team. Short simple passes are derided as sideways and movement simply isn't good enough.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 13 Jun 2010 19:34
Royal Rother Maybe I've missed a point here but all I was saying is that there are not 40,000,000 football fans in this country.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 13 Jun 2010 19:35
Hoop BlahIan Royal Part of the problem early on is that good players are encouraged to win games solo and ignore teamplay, certainly with the weaker players.
When they're no longer a cut above the players they are against (attackers usually favoured over defenders at young ages) they don't know how to work as a team. Short simple passes are derided as sideways and movement simply isn't good enough.
Any evidence of that?
If you'd have said we favour athleticism over techniqual quality in many youngsters I might agree, although a lot less now than 20 years ago.
Countries tend to produce players that reflect the countries society, culture and pysche. Ours tends to produce players who are a bit more reserved and steady than the likes of the freethinking Dutch or more artisan Latin countries.
by Hoop Blah » 13 Jun 2010 19:44
No Fixed Abode I love most people's over - reactions to England games
Green is the worst keeper ever now
Gerrard MOM - now he's the best thing since sliced bread
1-1 draw in the opening game against the USA who are a decent side is like a defeat
Just relax.
FWIW - Joe Cole surely should be starting the next game.
Lennon and Cole on either flank. that's a deffo.
by FiNeRaIn » 13 Jun 2010 19:46
by Hoop Blah » 13 Jun 2010 19:49
Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Have you ever worked with Dutch people? They are like Germans, but without the laid-back attitude.
by Hoop Blah » 13 Jun 2010 19:53
FiNeRaIn Why isn't Joe Hart number one?
Why replace one calamity with another?
England need a keeper than DOESNT make mistakes... I don't care about them pulling off world class saves, I'd just rather they had someone who kept the easy one's out, then its the defenses fault when we concede and not the keeper.
by Royal Rother » 13 Jun 2010 20:44
FiNeRaIn Why isn't Joe Hart number one?
Why replace one calamity with another?
England need a keeper than DOESNT make mistakes... I don't care about them pulling off world class saves, I'd just rather they had someone who kept the easy one's out, then its the defenses fault when we concede and not the keeper.
by Ian Royal » 13 Jun 2010 21:35
Hoop BlahIan Royal Part of the problem early on is that good players are encouraged to win games solo and ignore teamplay, certainly with the weaker players.
When they're no longer a cut above the players they are against (attackers usually favoured over defenders at young ages) they don't know how to work as a team. Short simple passes are derided as sideways and movement simply isn't good enough.
Any evidence of that?
If you'd have said we favour athleticism over techniqual quality in many youngsters I might agree, although a lot less now than 20 years ago.
Countries tend to produce players that reflect the countries society, culture and pysche. Ours tends to produce players who are a bit more reserved and steady than the likes of the freethinking Dutch or more artisan Latin countries.
by Tails » 13 Jun 2010 21:39
by Ian Royal » 13 Jun 2010 21:40
by Tails » 13 Jun 2010 21:57
Ian Royal Did they have a great deal of choice?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 115 guests