paultheroyal As per Mcdermott quote - no more signings.
Tosh!
by Dirk Gently » 07 Jul 2010 13:34
paultheroyal As per Mcdermott quote - no more signings.
by paultheroyal » 07 Jul 2010 13:45
Dirk Gentlypaultheroyal As per Mcdermott quote - no more signings.
Tosh!
by Dirk Gently » 07 Jul 2010 13:52
paultheroyalDirk Gentlypaultheroyal As per Mcdermott quote - no more signings.
Tosh!
It is what the man says, which will do for me now.
Brian Mcdermott >>>> Dirk Gently
by paultheroyal » 07 Jul 2010 13:56
by Dirk Gently » 07 Jul 2010 14:02
paultheroyal Dirk what are you going on about?
The man has come out and said he is happy with his squad and not looking to sign anymore players. Happy with his squad. Lets leave it at that. Suffice to say, if big bid comes in for Mills or Kebe for example then yes he will have to look. But as it stands what we have is what we have got. Dont become one of these posters Dirk trying to cover all bases, you are better than that.
by floyd__streete » 07 Jul 2010 14:18
by shaka's shorts » 07 Jul 2010 14:45
by rfcjoe » 07 Jul 2010 14:56
by loyalroyal4life » 07 Jul 2010 15:03
brendywendy at least theyve got rid of the gay neck designs.
i was hoping for the uraguay kit design, but thisll do
by Sun Tzu » 07 Jul 2010 15:17
shaka's shorts I suspect a few numbers may be freed up soon - 12 Mooney, 4 Cisse, 21 Hamer, 27 Davies.....
Armstrong goes from 3 to 33.....not looking good
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 07 Jul 2010 15:40
Sun Tzushaka's shorts I suspect a few numbers may be freed up soon - 12 Mooney, 4 Cisse, 21 Hamer, 27 Davies.....
Armstrong goes from 3 to 33.....not looking good
Don't understand the last point. How is a long term injured player being given a squad number not 'good' ?
by Terminal Boardom » 07 Jul 2010 16:04
Dirk Gentlypaultheroyal Dirk what are you going on about?
The man has come out and said he is happy with his squad and not looking to sign anymore players. Happy with his squad. Lets leave it at that. Suffice to say, if big bid comes in for Mills or Kebe for example then yes he will have to look. But as it stands what we have is what we have got. Dont become one of these posters Dirk trying to cover all bases, you are better than that.
I'm not trying to cover bases at all - I'm just pointing out that things released by football clubs' publicity machines aren't worth taking any notice of.
If we were looking to buy a specific player or one to fill a particular hole, why on earth would we advertise it to the world? It would alert sellers and send prices up - remember Tommy Smith?
It might be true, but it;s just as likely to not be - all I am saying is that a statement like that is worthless and so it's not worth taking any notice of it. .
by Ian Royal » 07 Jul 2010 16:11
by Turns8 » 07 Jul 2010 16:12
Sun Tzushaka's shorts I suspect a few numbers may be freed up soon - 12 Mooney, 4 Cisse, 21 Hamer, 27 Davies.....
Armstrong goes from 3 to 33.....not looking good
Don't understand the last point. How is a long term injured player being given a squad number not 'good' ?
by Terminal Boardom » 07 Jul 2010 16:15
Turns8Sun Tzushaka's shorts I suspect a few numbers may be freed up soon - 12 Mooney, 4 Cisse, 21 Hamer, 27 Davies.....
Armstrong goes from 3 to 33.....not looking good
Don't understand the last point. How is a long term injured player being given a squad number not 'good' ?
...and the fact that he's got 33 has nothing to do with it either...many players are superstitious about numbers...given that Willo has been bought as first choice, no player would want number 13, 23 was already Rasiak's so 33 was the first available shirt...given Stretch's favoured position/number is LB and 3...maybe that's the real reason for the squad number...
by Turns8 » 07 Jul 2010 16:24
Terminal BoardomTurns8Sun Tzu
Don't understand the last point. How is a long term injured player being given a squad number not 'good' ?
...and the fact that he's got 33 has nothing to do with it either...many players are superstitious about numbers...given that Willo has been bought as first choice, no player would want number 13, 23 was already Rasiak's so 33 was the first available shirt...given Stretch's favoured position/number is LB and 3...maybe that's the real reason for the squad number...
How many countries have used #13 in this year's World Cup?
by SLAMMED » 07 Jul 2010 16:26
by rfcjoe » 07 Jul 2010 16:27
by leww_rfc » 07 Jul 2010 16:59
rfcjoe i actually punched myself in the face, instead of a facepalm ^
by SLAMMED » 07 Jul 2010 17:20
rfcjoe i actually punched myself in the face, instead of a facepalm ^
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], South Coast Royal and 267 guests