by Handsome Man » 09 Jul 2010 23:02
by Fezza » 09 Jul 2010 23:09
by southstand67 » 09 Jul 2010 23:17
by paultheroyal » 09 Jul 2010 23:24
southstand67 Will this kit be changed next season too?
by southstand67 » 09 Jul 2010 23:30
by floyd__streete » 09 Jul 2010 23:49
Sun Tzu As a suggestion, you swap your allegiance to them and be happy in a shirt you like
Sun Tzu I'll keep wearing my Primark polo to games and support a decent team !!
by leww_rfc » 10 Jul 2010 00:55
SLAMMEDpaultheroyalSLAMMED Ladies and Gentleman, I officially announce the unveiling of the Reading FC 2010/2011 Home shirt
LOL
My shirt > The actual shirt.
by robb the royal » 10 Jul 2010 02:04
Tad Showbiz I'm not keen on either kit. I have some issues with the home kit...
1. Why have we reverted back to a plain back? Whats wrong with hoops all the way round?
2. Looks like someone has gone crazy with some tip-ex through the blue while desiging the shirt!
3. Plain colour arms, why?
4. Blue shorts? Wrong again should be white!
5. Blue socks? Wrong should be white!
Agree with Ian Royal here the whole kit looks like it has been designed by someone while on work experience at Puma.
Away kit...
I have never liked black away kits and the red bit on the shoulders and red socks makes it look like some old Swindon away kit.
-1,000,000 for both effort and design from Puma.
by W&E Royal » 10 Jul 2010 02:24
by Paul Cowin » 10 Jul 2010 02:45
by FiNeRaIn » 10 Jul 2010 05:45
by loyalroyal4life » 10 Jul 2010 06:26
Ian RoyalFezza Really don't mind either the home or away kit. However, the keeper's kit is almost as bad as the infamous David Seaman opal fruit number.... so bad that it is in fact good.
I like the away kit, but then I was a big fan of the last black away kit. The goalie kit is truely horrific. The home just looks sloppy.
by parky » 10 Jul 2010 10:16
by Royal_Delight » 10 Jul 2010 15:35
by SLAMMED » 10 Jul 2010 15:59
robb the royal I'm pretty sure there is a ruling in the football league that shirts must have a plain colour block on the back of the shirt where the printing is, so the name and number can be read more clearly. thats why last years shirt was launched with proper hoops, but early in the season, the players started wearing shoirts with plain backs
by W&E Royal » 10 Jul 2010 19:45
SLAMMEDrobb the royal I'm pretty sure there is a ruling in the football league that shirts must have a plain colour block on the back of the shirt where the printing is, so the name and number can be read more clearly. thats why last years shirt was launched with proper hoops, but early in the season, the players started wearing shoirts with plain backs
It only had a block of white on the back when we were live on TV.
For all other games we still had the hoops all the way around. Clearly you only watched us on TV last year then, pLOLastic.
havocstarliaison
STAR have raised this several times but as Dirk has said unless there are only two possibilities you are likely to have more people choosing a losing design, and as is obvious from reading this thread we are not all of the same opinion so whose opinion is most important? I have read here that this is the best design and the worst design ever, so not much movement there to get them to agree is there?
plz post up a link to someone saying it was the best ever
Dirk Gently It's a product being offered for sale, not a ground-breaking piece of high art.
Get over yourselves and if you don't like it then don't buy it!
starliaisonSun TzuHoop Blah
Has anyone ever heard of them holding a focus group or anything like that on the kit?
Can't recall if the kit was on the agenda but there have definitely been focus groups held by the club about various things in the past.
I think some fan input on the kit would be a good idea, but also suspect that almost whatever was chosen would get the usual mixed reaction.
I'm not sure it's worth the fuss. It's much like the kit of any season for the last few decades - it's blue and white hoops with some mucking around. I won't buy one, because i don't ever buy the kit. It won't have any impact on how we do on the pitch, and as such I'll file it under 'better things to worry about'
STAR have raised this several times but as Dirk has said unless there are only two possibilities you are likely to have more people choosing a losing design, and as is obvious from reading this thread we are not all of the same opinion so whose opinion is most important? I have read here that this is the best design and the worst design ever, so not much movement there to get them to agree is there?
by Royalcop » 10 Jul 2010 22:33
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests