Portsmouth Admin

753 posts
User avatar
TFF
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5321
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 09:17
Location: Running to the hills

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by TFF » 05 Aug 2010 17:04

Oh well,

we'll just have to beat them now.

User avatar
Y21_Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1186
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 13:38
Location: Reading fans team #2

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Y21_Royal » 05 Aug 2010 17:05

Who Moved The Goalposts? Well done, Justice Mann. You've just sent a great message to all of us working our bollocks off day in day out, abiding by what we thought was the law of the land, that we should know our place. Thanks.


I think its a bit pointless to criticize the judge. Clearly HMRC didn't have a good enough case. The fact that there's no appeal suggests that they know that. If you want to be angry at anyone (besides the tax evading pcunters) then be angry at those lawyers who weren't able to make a good enough case.

I fear this may now set a dangerous legal precedent for other teams that go down Pompey's route (I'm sure Cardiff and Hull were watching eagerly for this result) and aid other clubs in avoiding paying up

User avatar
Who Moved The Goalposts?
Member
Posts: 954
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:23
Location: Tilehurst, 4 miles from heaven & hell

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 05 Aug 2010 17:13

Y21_Royal I fear this may now set a dangerous legal precedent for other teams that go down Pompey's route (I'm sure Cardiff and Hull were watching eagerly for this result) and aid other clubs in avoiding paying up


That's the problem. Where does it all stop?

What's the point in a competition where the playing field isn't so much as level as full of hills that you can hide behind and snipe away at the enemy without fear. There's every likeliehood Pompey will now sign (on loan probably) six or so players and be challenging for promotion, and if they achieve that, go to the PL with 80% of their debt wiped out.

It's just mind boggling.

User avatar
TFF
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5321
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 09:17
Location: Running to the hills

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by TFF » 05 Aug 2010 17:14

But Cardiff and Hull are a whole year away from being in Pompey's position. This was all about not entering the season without a CVA, and thus avoiding a further points penalty.

If Cardiff and/or Hull go bust they'd get a 10-point penalty and transfer embargo just as before.

Super_horns
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1004
Joined: 22 Sep 2004 09:19
Location: Harpeden

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Super_horns » 05 Aug 2010 17:14

Good news for the Pompey fans who have suffered through this although not their owners etc who really have messed that club up.

The thing is they'll come out of administration with a take-over I presume and then some fans will expect money to be spent again to achieve promotion or something such is the expectations of them.

Clubs do get anyway with over-spending it seems but I suspect they feel the need to in order to statisfy fans who want "ambition"


User avatar
Y21_Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1186
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 13:38
Location: Reading fans team #2

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Y21_Royal » 05 Aug 2010 17:21

Who Moved The Goalposts?
Y21_Royal I fear this may now set a dangerous legal precedent for other teams that go down Pompey's route (I'm sure Cardiff and Hull were watching eagerly for this result) and aid other clubs in avoiding paying up


That's the problem. Where does it all stop?

What's the point in a competition where the playing field isn't so much as level as full of hills that you can hide behind and snipe away at the enemy without fear. There's every likeliehood Pompey will now sign (on loan probably) six or so players and be challenging for promotion, and if they achieve that, go to the PL with 80% of their debt wiped out.

It's just mind boggling.


I can't see Pompey challenging for promotion but I agree to a point.

The main issue is this football creditors rule which it seems has now been given a rubber stamp by the courts. So long as the principle creditors are other clubs then there will be no changes because its simply not in their interests for it to be any different.

The best way to punish Pompey will be to make sure that on the pitch they struggle and go down, making them as unattractive a proposition to buy as possible. Send them into administration again and see if next time HMEC do a better job of keeping them there

Super_horns
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1004
Joined: 22 Sep 2004 09:19
Location: Harpeden

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Super_horns » 05 Aug 2010 17:27

In an ideal world clubs would run a realistic business type model of how to spend wisely but that doesn't always get you anywhere ofcourse.

If clubs can pay over the odds to achieve they will...

User avatar
Row Z Royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10365
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 20:01
Location: LOLandmarks come and go. There'll only ever be one "Clickety Clique"

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Row Z Royal » 05 Aug 2010 17:34

Was the challenge to the football creditors rule? I though that the judge was asked to consider the HMRC's claim to tax revenue as a % of the total Pompey debt, thus giving them the opportunity to block the CVA and keep Pompey in adminstration until such time as the FCR could be challenged.

User avatar
cmonurz
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12384
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 22:50
Location: Nob nob nob nob nob nob

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by cmonurz » 05 Aug 2010 17:37

Is it Germany where no club is allowed to operate in debt? Great atmosphere at games fuelled by low ticket prices and a brilliant infrastructure for the fans, financial differential between clubs minimised (Bayern will always be Bayern, of course), clubs developing young players as an affordable alternative to splashing huge amounts on overseas players, perhaps as a result, German teams have had relatively little success in Europe in recent years, but on the flip-side their national side is one of the youngest and most exciting on the continent - is this something we aspire to, or do we, as fans, actually just want all the superstars playing in our league?


User avatar
Y21_Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1186
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 13:38
Location: Reading fans team #2

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Y21_Royal » 05 Aug 2010 17:39

Row Z Royal Was the challenge to the football creditors rule? I though that the judge was asked to consider the HMRC's claim to tax revenue as a % of the total Pompey debt, thus giving them the opportunity to block the CVA and keep Pompey in adminstration until such time as the FCR could be challenged.


My understanding of it is that HMRC were attempting to block the CVA on the basis that the football creditors rule meant that some players and clubs would receive 100% of their monies owed whereas the taxman gets a much smaller percentage. With the CVA block Pompey would then still be administration for the start of the season.

That's just my understanding of it and as with all things economic I plead a degree of ignorance

User avatar
SLAMMED
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7514
Joined: 19 May 2008 16:12
Location: Let's leave before the lights come on

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by SLAMMED » 05 Aug 2010 17:40

Pcunts.

User avatar
Geekins
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2477
Joined: 07 Aug 2007 12:33
Location: Back on a kayak

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Geekins » 05 Aug 2010 17:46

Fooking hate that shower of shite. No points deduction and last seasons meant naff all as they were relegated anyway. :evil:

User avatar
Row Z Royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10365
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 20:01
Location: LOLandmarks come and go. There'll only ever be one "Clickety Clique"

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Row Z Royal » 05 Aug 2010 17:57

Y21_Royal
Row Z Royal Was the challenge to the football creditors rule? I though that the judge was asked to consider the HMRC's claim to tax revenue as a % of the total Pompey debt, thus giving them the opportunity to block the CVA and keep Pompey in adminstration until such time as the FCR could be challenged.


My understanding of it is that HMRC were attempting to block the CVA on the basis that the football creditors rule meant that some players and clubs would receive 100% of their monies owed whereas the taxman gets a much smaller percentage. With the CVA block Pompey would then still be administration for the start of the season.

That's just my understanding of it and as with all things economic I plead a degree of ignorance


That's essentially what I said, though mine chucked in the idea of staging the judgements as the judge couldn't rule on both the legality of HMRC's claim and the legality of the FCR at the same time.


User avatar
Who Moved The Goalposts?
Member
Posts: 954
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:23
Location: Tilehurst, 4 miles from heaven & hell

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 05 Aug 2010 18:51

Geekins Fooking hate that shower of shite. No points deduction and last seasons meant naff all as they were relegated anyway. :evil:


Is it not that they can only come out of administration once the buyer does the deal? Will this happen by Saturday? If not, points deduction, surely?

Or am I clutching at straws for even a minimal amount of justice?

buzzby
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1090
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 09:22
Location: Portsmouth

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by buzzby » 05 Aug 2010 19:09

It just said on South Today that former owner Chanrai will now be buying the club.

I think the guy they interviewed on the street summed it all up. "Get back to normal now and get back where we belong, in the Premiership"

What a joke!!

User avatar
Dirk Gently
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11850
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 13:54

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Dirk Gently » 05 Aug 2010 19:52

cmonurz Is it Germany where no club is allowed to operate in debt? Great atmosphere at games fuelled by low ticket prices and a brilliant infrastructure for the fans, financial differential between clubs minimised (Bayern will always be Bayern, of course), clubs developing young players as an affordable alternative to splashing huge amounts on overseas players, perhaps as a result, German teams have had relatively little success in Europe in recent years, but on the flip-side their national side is one of the youngest and most exciting on the continent - is this something we aspire to, or do we, as fans, actually just want all the superstars playing in our league?


Yep - the German football model is brillaint in so many ways

See http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4931180,00.html

Tony Le Mesmer
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3404
Joined: 17 Jun 2005 20:37
Location: Dundee in my bare feet

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Tony Le Mesmer » 05 Aug 2010 20:38

Super_horns Good news for the Pompey fans who have suffered through this although not their owners etc who really have messed that club up.

The thing is they'll come out of administration with a take-over I presume and then some fans will expect money to be spent again to achieve promotion or something such is the expectations of them.

Clubs do get anyway with over-spending it seems but I suspect they feel the need to in order to statisfy fans who want "ambition"


Doesnt the terms of the CVA prevent them from doing this?

Surely Chanrai's incentive for buying the club is to get more of his investment back? Hes not in it for the love of the game is he?

I think this decision is just a reprieve. Instead of a quick execution, they will now probably die a lingering painful death. They still have £20m odd to repay under the CVA, in the Chamionship whilst there owner bleeds the club and previous owners still lay claim to surrounding land.

I would be amazed if they turn the corner from here and get through the next few years without sinking a lot further

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Royal With Cheese » 05 Aug 2010 21:09

Who Moved The Goalposts? I know some people would think this as melodramatic, but I really don't think I can bring myself to go on Saturday now.

This goes beyond RFC. I simply cannot support - financially and morally - a system that basically now has legal confirmation it's a law unto itself. A system that gets away with paying astronomical wages yet not have to pay the taxes on those wages. A system that relegates me and fellow ordinary supporters who pay through the nose to watch its product at the lowest end of the food chain, people who in the real world have to obey the laws they have so flagrantly and brazenly ignored.

After the MPs expenses, bankers, golden handshakes for mega-failures theres this.

Well done, Justice Mann. You've just sent a great message to all of us working our bollocks off day in day out, abiding by what we thought was the law of the land, that we should know our place. Thanks.

Isn't this the way it's always been? Just with Sky Sports News on the case and the interwebz everyone is more aware of the situation.

FTR I agree with you Goalposts. It stinks big time.

Bowman's Quiver
Member
Posts: 310
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:02
Location: Henpecked

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Bowman's Quiver » 05 Aug 2010 21:20

Tony Le Mesmer
Super_horns Good news for the Pompey fans who have suffered through this although not their owners etc who really have messed that club up.

The thing is they'll come out of administration with a take-over I presume and then some fans will expect money to be spent again to achieve promotion or something such is the expectations of them.

Clubs do get anyway with over-spending it seems but I suspect they feel the need to in order to statisfy fans who want "ambition"


Doesnt the terms of the CVA prevent them from doing this?

Surely Chanrai's incentive for buying the club is to get more of his investment back? Hes not in it for the love of the game is he?

I think this decision is just a reprieve. Instead of a quick execution, they will now probably die a lingering painful death. They still have £20m odd to repay under the CVA, in the Chamionship whilst there owner bleeds the club and previous owners still lay claim to surrounding land.

I would be amazed if they turn the corner from here and get through the next few years without sinking a lot further


That's my understanding of matters as well. Chanrai is to all extent a sheep in wolves clothing who many Pompey fans fear will bleed the club dry. So today's judgement, whilst a repreive, may yet turn out to be something of a poison chalice.

Bizarrly, HMRC may just have been the best friend those supporters could have had.

Once were Biscuitmen
Member
Posts: 610
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:56
Location: The Shire

Re: Portsmouth Admin

by Once were Biscuitmen » 05 Aug 2010 22:44

The problem is this.

If HMRC had won on the footballers creditor argument then Pompey would have been thrown out of the league. Then, as their barrister argued, they would have been liquidated and the unsecured, non-football creditors would have ended up with much less than 20%.

More interesting will be the detail of the written judgement over the tax status of image rights paid to foreign bank accounts, although their is a separate case pending on this issue.

753 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests

It is currently 26 Nov 2024 11:20