by jonboy29red » 07 Aug 2010 09:28
by Terminal Boardom » 07 Aug 2010 12:00
by Tad Showbiz » 07 Aug 2010 12:19
jonboy29red thought may as well start this now
by Royal Lady » 07 Aug 2010 13:44
by Jerry St Clair » 07 Aug 2010 14:35
Royal Lady Am I allowed to refuse to let them look in my handbag whilst everyone else is allowed to just wander in through the turnstiles without anyone ever been searched?
by Royal Lady » 07 Aug 2010 19:33
Well, today I just put my bag on left shoulder and walked past the steward who was stood to my right. Job done.Jerry St ClairRoyal Lady Am I allowed to refuse to let them look in my handbag whilst everyone else is allowed to just wander in through the turnstiles without anyone ever been searched?
You can, but you won't get in.
by jonboy29red » 07 Aug 2010 19:41
Royal LadyWell, today I just put my bag on left shoulder and walked past the steward who was stood to my right. Job done.Jerry St ClairRoyal Lady Am I allowed to refuse to let them look in my handbag whilst everyone else is allowed to just wander in through the turnstiles without anyone ever been searched?
You can, but you won't get in.
by Terminal Boardom » 07 Aug 2010 19:41
Royal LadyWell, today I just put my bag on left shoulder and walked past the steward who was stood to my right. Job done.Jerry St ClairRoyal Lady Am I allowed to refuse to let them look in my handbag whilst everyone else is allowed to just wander in through the turnstiles without anyone ever been searched?
You can, but you won't get in.
by Royal Lady » 07 Aug 2010 19:44
by Terminal Boardom » 07 Aug 2010 19:50
Royal Lady I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
by Rex » 07 Aug 2010 19:50
by LoyalRoyalFan » 07 Aug 2010 19:52
by jonboy29red » 07 Aug 2010 19:58
Royal Lady I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
by Rex » 07 Aug 2010 20:00
by handbags_harris » 07 Aug 2010 23:47
Royal Lady I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
by Reading Til I Die » 08 Aug 2010 00:34
handbags_harrisRoyal Lady I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
They're worried that 12" dildo with the girth of an elephants leg could be used as a weapon RL.
by Big Foot » 08 Aug 2010 13:14
Royal Lady I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
by Royal Lady » 08 Aug 2010 13:40
Big FootRoyal Lady I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
Can't think of any 20 year olds who wore a baggy jacket to the game yesterday off the top of my head Wonder if he was searched
by Big Foot » 08 Aug 2010 13:54
I don't think it's comparable really, people with bags get searched regardless of it being a lady like you with your handbag full of fags and lippy to the occasions when I've had a tote bag containing my Reading flag.Royal LadyBig FootRoyal Lady I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
Can't think of any 20 year olds who wore a baggy jacket to the game yesterday off the top of my head Wonder if he was searched
I didn't mean anyone in particular you loon! It was just an example. Even you would agree that out of 2 people likely to be carrying an offensive weapon with intent to cause danger to others, the choice between me or a young bloke who has had a couple of beers prior to the game would indicate to the more sane amongst us that the young bloke is the more likely of the two. I wouldn't care if I was searched all the time, if I saw others being frisked, but they're not.
by Royal Lady » 08 Aug 2010 18:08
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests