by 3 veesinarow » 13 Aug 2010 12:27
by brendywendy » 13 Aug 2010 12:32
by Old Biscuitman » 13 Aug 2010 12:58
by Whore Jackie » 13 Aug 2010 13:15
by FiNeRaIn » 13 Aug 2010 13:18
Terminal BoardomFiNeRaIn Managers don't base decisions on whether a club has hooligans for supporters or not, how ridiculous. There are hundreds of arrests and man united, liverpool, man city, chelsea,etc games - do any of those managers give a toss?
You also left out the fact that Millwall fans by all reports more than gave as good as they got. Reports of darts and bottles being thrown from the away end into the home section you've left out.
Only a Rangers fan could come out with a statement like that
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 13 Aug 2010 13:42
Old Biscuitman I believe that there are two principal reasons behind Coppell's decision to resign.
Lansdown the City owner does pull the strings, but since he lives outside the UK he works through Colin Sexstone, his Chief Executive. I knew Sexstone previously when he had the same role at Gloucestershire CCC. He is most definitely not Coppell's type of person, varies between the pushy and the smarmy, and has a very high opinion of himself. It is hard to see SC working closely with him. There are also a lot of politics within the club, more so given their push to get local planning permission for a new stadium.
Second reason is the culture at Bristol City. It is not the family club which Reading successfully became and which clearly suited Coppell. Despite claims to the contrary there is still a drinking culture there as well as something of a wurzel mentality.
by sandman » 13 Aug 2010 14:02
Daily Mail:
Steve Coppell's abrupt departure from Bristol City after less than four months as manager was brought about because his working relationship with demanding multi-millionaire stockbroker owner Steve Lansdown had broken down in double quick time.
And Coppell doesn't hang around in those circumstances. The highly-principled Coppell also walked out of Manchester City after 33 days as manager because of interference from chairman Peter Swales.
by Old Biscuitman » 13 Aug 2010 14:13
Smoking Kills Dancing DoeOld Biscuitman I believe that there are two principal reasons behind Coppell's decision to resign.
Lansdown the City owner does pull the strings, but since he lives outside the UK he works through Colin Sexstone, his Chief Executive. I knew Sexstone previously when he had the same role at Gloucestershire CCC. He is most definitely not Coppell's type of person, varies between the pushy and the smarmy, and has a very high opinion of himself. It is hard to see SC working closely with him. There are also a lot of politics within the club, more so given their push to get local planning permission for a new stadium.
Second reason is the culture at Bristol City. It is not the family club which Reading successfully became and which clearly suited Coppell. Despite claims to the contrary there is still a drinking culture there as well as something of a wurzel mentality.
That's all a massive load of bollox tbf.
by Magnus » 13 Aug 2010 14:44
by Terminal Boardom » 13 Aug 2010 14:50
Old Biscuitman I believe that there are two principal reasons behind Coppell's decision to resign.
Lansdown the City owner does pull the strings, but since he lives outside the UK he works through Colin Sexstone, his Chief Executive. I knew Sexstone previously when he had the same role at Gloucestershire CCC. He is most definitely not Coppell's type of person, varies between the pushy and the smarmy, and has a very high opinion of himself. It is hard to see SC working closely with him. There are also a lot of politics within the club, more so given their push to get local planning permission for a new stadium.
Second reason is the culture at Bristol City. It is not the family club which Reading successfully became and which clearly suited Coppell. Despite claims to the contrary there is still a drinking culture there as well as something of a wurzel mentality.
by Royal Rother » 13 Aug 2010 14:53
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 13 Aug 2010 14:53
Magnus What do you mean by there is a drinking culture there?
The players? The back room staff?
by readingbedding » 13 Aug 2010 15:21
by Old Biscuitman » 13 Aug 2010 15:36
Smoking Kills Dancing DoeMagnus What do you mean by there is a drinking culture there?
The players? The back room staff?
There certainly is no drinking culture/problem at City.
by Wycombe Royal » 13 Aug 2010 15:39
Old BiscuitmanSmoking Kills Dancing DoeMagnus What do you mean by there is a drinking culture there?
The players? The back room staff?
There certainly is no drinking culture/problem at City.
Bollox. They have simply become cleverer at concealing it.
by Old Biscuitman » 13 Aug 2010 15:44
by Royal Rother » 13 Aug 2010 16:22
by Old Biscuitman » 13 Aug 2010 16:30
Royal Rother You won't be believed of course.
by Barry the bird boggler » 13 Aug 2010 16:40
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests