by under the tin »
18 Aug 2010 14:40
To be fair, this thread has meandered away from the original discussion, where some of us feel that having a central defence that could prove a liability to the team, and not addressing it because of budgetary constraints, could, in time, prove to be the mother of false economies should the club suffer relegation.
The discussion has broadened out into football finances generally, but to pick up on your comments...
Seal I love all this "some clubs are in financial trouble therefore the soul of football is corrupt and I'm not participating in it anymore" stuff
Do you stop buying cars, using a bank and going on holiday because a few of those business that have been run badly collapse?
Isn't debt a part of business? Didn't Ford borrow $26bn to restructure their whole business?
Borrowing to restucture, rebuild a stadium is one thing, paying unsustainable wages to stellar footballers, then short changing all the other creditors when the money runs out is quite something else.
As long as clubs pay their bills what's the problem? Portsmouth haven'tI can't believe everyone getting so work up over Cardiff and Pompey. Pompey got relegated and lost all their player so have had certainly paid some degree of their dues. Cardiff are gambling and we wait to see if it pays off. Good luck to them. If it doesn't then we can all laugh and say "i told you so". I'm sure Motherwell will get their money soon enough. It was just a nice PR opportunity to jump on the back of the Bellamy story. Standard stuff.
Portsmouth, like any other city in the UK, has areas of social deprivation. I've no doubt that Pompey trawl around their local schools, encouraging those kids to support their local team, whilst at the same time, pay players via offshore companies, so that those players can circumnavigate their tax liabilities, depriving those very schools of money. Where is the social conscience?
Clubs like Pompey may not be financially bankrupt, but they certainly are, morally.