by Harpers So Solid Crew » 26 Aug 2010 12:12
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 26 Aug 2010 12:14
Royal Lady Did, or did not, JM pay for the extension to the hotel out of some of the money from the football club - under "something or other Holdings Ltd"?
by Yellowcoat » 26 Aug 2010 12:19
by Royal Lady » 26 Aug 2010 12:23
by Yellowcoat » 26 Aug 2010 12:30
by Mad Dog's Ghost » 26 Aug 2010 13:08
by Yellowcoat » 26 Aug 2010 13:37
by Mad Dog's Ghost » 26 Aug 2010 14:59
by brendywendy » 26 Aug 2010 15:38
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 26 Aug 2010 16:22
by Yellowcoat » 26 Aug 2010 16:49
by Gordons Cumming » 26 Aug 2010 16:51
DOYLERSAROYALER Id assume that those architects plans for the stadium extension (another part of the Chairmans PR campaign) have been well and truly shredded in the clubs admin office by his loyal servant Hammond !
F**k Hammond's wages alone would go some way to getting something positive done on the pitch
If he went tomorrow would the club buckle ??? If the answer is No then why is he there in a role that is becoming yesterdays fashion!...he's doing what Howe should be doing, but lets not get onto that one...because he is an embarrassment to the club
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 26 Aug 2010 16:59
Yellowcoat Yet another with superior insight without any knowledge of their actual roles!
by Yellowcoat » 26 Aug 2010 17:01
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 26 Aug 2010 17:12
Yellowcoat Not up to me to justify their positions. Just asking you to think things through before making statements about things you have no knowledge of.
by holsgrove breaks a leg » 26 Aug 2010 17:13
ROKERITE The biggest mistake Sir John has made is allowing himself to be swayed by a few short-sighted fans. If he'd stuck to his guns and given his full backing to Rodgers, the future for Reading would be a lot brighter.
by Terminal Boardom » 26 Aug 2010 17:16
DOYLERSAROYALER Id assume that those architects plans for the stadium extension (another part of the Chairmans PR campaign) have been well and truly shredded in the clubs admin office by his loyal servant Hammond !
by RoyalBlue » 26 Aug 2010 17:47
Terminal BoardomDOYLERSAROYALER Id assume that those architects plans for the stadium extension (another part of the Chairmans PR campaign) have been well and truly shredded in the clubs admin office by his loyal servant Hammond !
Not at all. There is an application for an extension to the original application. Have a look on one of the lamp-posts on the approach to the South Stand. Quite clear for all to see - or at least it was when I last saw it.
by RoyalBlue » 26 Aug 2010 18:17
Yellowcoat HSSC the figures you have highlighted still show accumulated pre tax losses of over 15 million pounds (even with a missing year). Yet again making a nonsense about 'where has all the money gone' from the Premier League. People believe SJM is taking money back out of the club without any evidence to support this view. Given the state of the finances this is even less likely but the next available accounts will enable the facts to be established. Trouble is that headline figures of transfer fees are believed wrongly to be instant cash and no account whatsoever is taken of the considerable running costs and higher salaries than most expect. A tinge of realism is needed by the usual squad of harsher critics who appear to have no knowledge of running businesses from their ill informed rants.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 26 Aug 2010 18:27