by brendywendy » 29 Aug 2010 21:18
by Terminal Boardom » 29 Aug 2010 21:45
by URZZ » 29 Aug 2010 22:06
shaka's shorts miles better than Williams IMHO
Terminal Boardom I must admit to a facepalm moment when he was named but... give the lad credit. He did well.
by Pablo » 29 Aug 2010 22:20
by handbags_harris » 29 Aug 2010 22:21
Pablo He wasn't great but had a very good game.
by Pablo » 29 Aug 2010 22:51
handbags_harrisPablo He wasn't great but had a very good game.
What???
First 20-30 minutes he was given a torrid time by Dyer, simply rinsed for pace on more than one occasion. As the game wore on though he seemed to get much much better. Fair play, there is absolutely no doubt that he must have been nervous at kick off given the up until then complete lack of faith McDermott has shown him, and to come up with the not perfect performance, but certainly not anywhere near as bad as many thought he would be, takes a fair amount of balls.
by LoyalRoyal22 » 29 Aug 2010 23:57
by Boyband » 30 Aug 2010 10:17
by Royal Rother » 30 Aug 2010 10:34
by handbags_harris » 30 Aug 2010 12:37
Boyband Shaun Cummings > Marcus Williams. And he wasn't even playing on his natural side.
Handled Dyer, the player who gave Griff a roasting or two at the Walkers last season, pretty well.
by ZacNaloen » 30 Aug 2010 12:41
by georgerob » 30 Aug 2010 13:34
by peterroyal76 » 30 Aug 2010 13:51
by Mad Dog's Ghost » 30 Aug 2010 21:29
by Mad Dog's Ghost » 30 Aug 2010 21:29
by Maguire » 30 Aug 2010 21:31
by Royal Lady » 30 Aug 2010 21:34
Maguire I think we should bury him in a hole once Gylfi leaves.
by Arch » 30 Aug 2010 21:47
Royal LadyMaguire I think we should bury him in a hole once Gylfi leaves.
by Tad Showbiz » 01 Sep 2010 13:54
by Ferris » 01 Sep 2010 13:56
URZZshaka's shorts miles better than Williams IMHO
Didn't notice a real difference between the two
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Kev Royal and 240 guests