brendywendy ISNT THE HOTEL A NET CONTRIBUTOR ETC ETC
No, not since 2008
by Sir Rodger Doyle » 30 Aug 2010 22:00
brendywendy ISNT THE HOTEL A NET CONTRIBUTOR ETC ETC
by brendywendy » 30 Aug 2010 22:03
by Handsome Man » 30 Aug 2010 22:05
brendywendy Wouldnt surprise me if the withdrawal of financial support,and leaving us to feel what its like only spending the money bring in is just jms reaction, to being bood and accused of robbing the club at the very first sign of trouble. I know i would do the same if i was subjected to such horrendous public ingratitude. And the results we see would serve every single of the people who bood and sang along right.
We were shit,and played in a shed,and the new stadium, 106 points,7th place in the prem, squads full of intl players,season after season of competitive championship and prem football,and a name people now respect instead of laugh at, were all just a laughable dream. You should all be ashamed. Booooooo you, you muthas.
by brendywendy » 30 Aug 2010 22:09
by MmmMonsterMunch » 30 Aug 2010 22:11
brendywendy Wouldnt surprise me if the withdrawal of financial support,and leaving us to feel what its like only spending the money bring in is just jms reaction, to being bood and accused of robbing the club at the very first sign of trouble. I know i would do the same if i was subjected to such horrendous public ingratitude. And the results we see would serve every single of the people who bood and sang along right.
We were shit,and played in a shed,and the new stadium, 106 points,7th place in the prem, squads full of intl players,season after season of competitive championship and prem football,and a name people now respect instead of laugh at, were all just a laughable dream. You should all be ashamed. Booooooo you, you muthas.
by FiNeRaIn » 30 Aug 2010 22:14
brendywendy Wouldnt surprise me if the withdrawal of financial support,and leaving us to feel what its like only spending the money bring in is just jms reaction, to being bood and accused of robbing the club at the very first sign of trouble. I know i would do the same if i was subjected to such horrendous public ingratitude. And the results we see would serve every single of the people who bood and sang along right.
We were shit,and played in a shed,and the new stadium, 106 points,7th place in the prem, squads full of intl players,season after season of competitive championship and prem football,and a name people now respect instead of laugh at, were all just a laughable dream. You should all be ashamed. Booooooo you, you muthas.
by Handsome Man » 30 Aug 2010 22:23
by Royal Rother » 30 Aug 2010 23:07
by FiNeRaIn » 30 Aug 2010 23:24
Royal Rother Every time these threads start up the same old nonsense comes out. It's laughable. You might not agree with the way his going about things but when people suggest he has no ambition for the club or is destroying it, it just make me laugh now.
The club is run to a different set of rules to the majority and those rules include ensuring that the club has a viable long-term future whether a new buyer comes in or not. Selling young players for multi-millions is good business in a financial climate as volatile as this one. And if he chooses to write himself a cheque for the whole of the tfr fee it won't change my opinion of him a jot. It is HIS fcuking money people. Everything this club has done over the last 20 years is as a result of HIS money and he is still owed it. And he hasn't taken a salary during the entire time he's been here, nor has he charged exorbitant rates of interest on the substantial loans he made to the club.
Sure he enjoyed his time in the limelight for a bit (probably) - so what? Sure, he might even have a big ego and be a bit eccentric - again, so fcuking what?
by Royal Rother » 30 Aug 2010 23:36
by FiNeRaIn » 30 Aug 2010 23:45
Royal Rother Where did we finish in the last 2 seasons after these asset stripping seasons people keep talking about. The club is not on its knees, it has money to reinvest in the team (presumably) and the continued support of loans from the owner. The vast majority of the other 92 would love to be in our position financially and with an ever expanding and productive academy. There is always a chance of relegation but the club is still moving forward in ways that will ensure its long-term future.
Anyway, what is the ABSOLUTE EXTREME you speak of? Absolute Financial Security? I can see that wouldn't appeal to everybody but it's okay with many I suspect, disappointed though everyone will be at Gylfi's departure.
by Horsham Royal » 30 Aug 2010 23:53
by Royal Rother » 31 Aug 2010 00:30
FiNeRaInRoyal Rother Where did we finish in the last 2 seasons after these asset stripping seasons people keep talking about. The club is not on its knees, it has money to reinvest in the team (presumably) and the continued support of loans from the owner. The vast majority of the other 92 would love to be in our position financially and with an ever expanding and productive academy. There is always a chance of relegation but the club is still moving forward in ways that will ensure its long-term future.
Anyway, what is the ABSOLUTE EXTREME you speak of? Absolute Financial Security? I can see that wouldn't appeal to everybody but it's okay with many I suspect, disappointed though everyone will be at Gylfi's departure.
Absolute extreme is continuing to sell the prized assets and not strengthen obvious weaknesses. Last match we had a fullback who hadn't played for the best part of a year...in the wrong position. We started with an injured centre back, a centre mid at right back who got injured and we had to replace with a right winger. We also had two strikers on the pitch, neither who have scored this season or look likely. The weaknesses are frighteningly obvious. We sit back and watch while clubs supposedly worse off financially than us invest in their teams and bring people in on loan ( something which does not break the bank) and we do absolutely nothing. How on earth, given the financial position of our club, can we not afford to bring people in on loan? Are you seriously accepting that RR?
by FiNeRaIn » 31 Aug 2010 00:34
by clauski » 31 Aug 2010 00:38
by Royal Rother » 31 Aug 2010 00:42
by Horsham Royal » 31 Aug 2010 00:50
Royal Rother FR, £1m a year? I suppose it funds the Academy for another 2 or 3 years, in which time another couple of Gylfis will have come through... mmmaybe!
But yeah, modern football being dominated by money and greed pretty much sucks - I like the fact we buck the trend in the way we are run. I realise others would prefer us to be more competitive in playing the same financial brinkmanship game that other clubs specialise in...
It's the endeless regurgitation of unnecessary insults towards Madejski that irritate me.
by clauski » 31 Aug 2010 00:52
Royal Rother
But yeah, modern football being dominated by money and greed pretty much sucks - I like the fact we buck the trend in the way we are run. I realise others would prefer us to be more competitive in playing the same financial brinkmanship game that other clubs specialise in...
by Royal Rother » 31 Aug 2010 01:16
by clauski » 31 Aug 2010 01:25
Royal Rother Where to start with that...?
Ok, who's been hurt?
The owners of the clubs who've pumped in millions then had to sell for sixpence, thus losing large chunks of their fortunes.
The creditors of the clubs who have gone into administration.
Small ones like the local suppliers and St Johns Ambulance for e.g.
Large ones like HMRC particularly, i.e. our taxes get w@nked off time and time again by poorly run clubs going bust. I've had enough of that personally.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 293 guests