What are we here for?

238 posts
User avatar
bigmike
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1497
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 00:33

Re: What are we here for?

by bigmike » 15 Jul 2010 09:29

LMAO Poor Old Pompey..... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

wolsey
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1604
Joined: 21 Oct 2005 15:22
Location: Wishing I was young enough and crass enough to care

Re: What are we here for?

by wolsey » 15 Jul 2010 10:27

Portsmouth FC and their supporters = Football's equivalent to Raoul Moat and his "fans".

"Nobody cared, nobody understood. I may have oxf*rd up, but it was everyone else's fault."

I'm glad I support a little, "unambitious" Club.

User avatar
RoyalChicagoFC
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2498
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 16:34
Location: In your dreams and everywhere else #apparently

Re: What are we here for?

by RoyalChicagoFC » 22 Oct 2010 19:35

Above herein on 30th June 2009, Carlin20
All is fine at Pompey.

I think it's more of a will Reading or southampton go out of business first?

Right, looks like this'll be as good a time as any for last words, a cig and and a blindfold

:lol:

ankeny
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1127
Joined: 21 Nov 2007 17:41
Location: Just a heartbeat away from Elm Park

Re: What are we here for?

by ankeny » 22 Oct 2010 20:06

History!They are History!I hope.

Millsy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10128
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 18:36
Location: Make the world safe again!

Re: What are we here for?

by Millsy » 22 Oct 2010 20:33

Much as I think they're idiots for gazumping us to get Tommy Smith especially when they couldn't bloody afford it, it's never nice to see a club go under.

What of all their fans who've supported them for generations?

Very sad for them and I for one will not be celebrating.


Percy's Rocket
Member
Posts: 369
Joined: 23 Sep 2008 21:10

Re: What are we here for?

by Percy's Rocket » 22 Oct 2010 20:41

I fully agree about the pain for their fans but what an object lesson in not living beyond your means..they got similar crowds to us in the prem I think but tried to employ at salaries which were totally unrealistic and so owe the inland revenue.. (ie us the taxpayer) a vast amount. Madman winds us all up but the conclusions are obvious.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11766
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: What are we here for?

by RoyalBlue » 22 Oct 2010 21:40

Percy's Rocket I fully agree about the pain for their fans but what an object lesson in not living beyond your means..they got similar crowds to us in the prem I think but tried to employ at salaries which were totally unrealistic and so owe the inland revenue.. (ie us the taxpayer) a vast amount. Madman winds us all up but the conclusions are obvious.


No they're sodding not. There is an absolutely massive gulf between the approach that Porstmouth adopted and that being followed by the bullsh*tting (genuine PL ambition, my *rse) Madejski.

All many supporters want is an approach somewhere in the middle of that gulf. If Madejski isn't prepared to walk his big mouthed talk and move to that midpoint, he should accept what the market feels that the club is worth, rather than what he in his dreams/arrogance thinks it's worth, and walk away.

southstand67
Member
Posts: 365
Joined: 06 Apr 2008 22:28
Location: RG4

Re: What are we here for?

by southstand67 » 22 Oct 2010 21:56

do they have to give the FA Cup back seeing as how they were living beyond their means when they bought it, I mean won it?

User avatar
roadrunner
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3196
Joined: 17 Aug 2010 22:50

Re: What are we here for?

by roadrunner » 22 Oct 2010 22:00

2 world wars, 1 world cup Much as I think they're idiots for gazumping us to get Tommy Smith especially when they couldn't bloody afford it, it's never nice to see a club go under.


But this is Portsmouth, so it's OK.


Millsy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10128
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 18:36
Location: Make the world safe again!

Re: What are we here for?

by Millsy » 22 Oct 2010 22:17

RoyalBlue
Percy's Rocket I fully agree about the pain for their fans but what an object lesson in not living beyond your means..they got similar crowds to us in the prem I think but tried to employ at salaries which were totally unrealistic and so owe the inland revenue.. (ie us the taxpayer) a vast amount. Madman winds us all up but the conclusions are obvious.


No they're sodding not. There is an absolutely massive gulf between the approach that Porstmouth adopted and that being followed by the bullsh*tting (genuine PL ambition, my *rse) Madejski.

All many supporters want is an approach somewhere in the middle of that gulf. If Madejski isn't prepared to walk his big mouthed talk and move to that midpoint, he should accept what the market feels that the club is worth, rather than what he in his dreams/arrogance thinks it's worth, and walk away.


I agree, it's daft looking at the extreme opposite cases and concludingng Madejski is some sort of hero!

There is obviously a massiv gulf between Pompey and what we did. Couldn't put it better myself and it's getting a bit boring when people point to the failures and automatically deduce that either it's Madejski's way, or it's ending up like the failures with no middle ground!

Perhaps we should point to the likes of Arsenal, Man U , Chelsea and say "see... if only we'd got that right winger in the second season of the Prem... if only we'd got a striker now... if only we'd spent a bit more... we would be top of the Premiership!" :roll:

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: What are we here for?

by Arch » 23 Oct 2010 02:00

What "we" do is adopt a very conservative strategy that you may or may not agree with. But let's not represent it as some kind of opposite extreme of insanity from Portsmouth. Our strategy makes us less competitive in the Championship than you might reasonably think we could or even should be. How competitive has their strategy made them if they don't exist this time next week?

To continue the incontinent spewing about Madejski as though he's comparable in some inverted way to Gaydamak, Storrie, Chanrai, Andronikou, etc is really utterly daft. Can't you criticize the club's policy without splattering us all with your diarrhoea?

User avatar
Wimb
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4397
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 09:43
Location: www.thetilehurstend.com

Re: What are we here for?

by Wimb » 23 Oct 2010 07:29

Arch What "we" do is adopt a very conservative strategy that you may or may not agree with. But let's not represent it as some kind of opposite extreme of insanity from Portsmouth. Our strategy makes us less competitive in the Championship than you might reasonably think we could or even should be. How competitive has their strategy made them if they don't exist this time next week?

To continue the incontinent spewing about Madejski as though he's comparable in some inverted way to Gaydamak, Storrie, Chanrai, Andronikou, etc is really utterly daft. Can't you criticize the club's policy without splattering us all with your diarrhoea?


This ^^^^

Millsy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10128
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 18:36
Location: Make the world safe again!

Re: What are we here for?

by Millsy » 23 Oct 2010 11:28

Arch What "we" do is adopt a very conservative strategy that you may or may not agree with. But let's not represent it as some kind of opposite extreme of insanity from Portsmouth. Our strategy makes us less competitive in the Championship than you might reasonably think we could or even should be. How competitive has their strategy made them if they don't exist this time next week?

To continue the incontinent spewing about Madejski as though he's comparable in some inverted way to Gaydamak, Storrie, Chanrai, Andronikou, etc is really utterly daft. Can't you criticize the club's policy without splattering us all with your diarrhoea?


Can't you take reasonable arguments/criticisms that you happen not to like without becoming offensive?

Read my post again and please tell me where I say our situation is an opposite extreme from Portsmouth. The whole point of my post is that pointing to any extreme (be it Pompey or Chelsea) is daft. Therefore I fully agree with your post.


User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11766
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: What are we here for?

by RoyalBlue » 23 Oct 2010 11:59

Guess what?!

Just like the Watford situation last season, it's now starting to look like the Pompey folding story was brinkmanship, undertaken to force the feuding parties into some form of agreement.

So, despite severe financial mismanagement, there still isn't going to be a club going under. Once again the doomsday scenario predicted by 'The Madejski way is the only way' disciples has been busted.

Elmer Park
Member
Posts: 693
Joined: 12 Nov 2008 16:02

Re: What are we here for?

by Elmer Park » 23 Oct 2010 13:31

I think a successful and well run Football Club has some members of the Management who are primarily concerned with the financial situation of the Club as a Business and they are there to temper the urge of those concerned purely with the football side of things who will always be looking to buy more and more players. The situation at Portsmouth is that it appears all the Management wanted to live the dream beyond their means as Clubs like Leeds have done before them and no one tempered this. 'Arry is not the sort of Manager to ask if his Club can really afford it if they keep giving him more and more cash to spend.

To me a Football Club is well run if the team achieves success on the field and ends each financial year in a reasonable and manageable business position.

I am concerned that we have reached the stage where the situation at our Club seems to have gone a little to the other extreme in that a successful season is one where we get as near to a break even financial situation as possible and end the season in a reasonable position in the league table.

Once the priority is no longer on field results the danger is that this can lead to a Club stagnating and after that it often follows that the team start to go backwards and relegation eventually follows.

User avatar
RoyalChicagoFC
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2498
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 16:34
Location: In your dreams and everywhere else #apparently

Re: What are we here for?

by RoyalChicagoFC » 23 Oct 2010 13:44

^ That right there, ladies and gentlemen

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: What are we here for?

by Arch » 23 Oct 2010 13:53

2 world wars, 1 world cup
Arch What "we" do is adopt a very conservative strategy that you may or may not agree with. But let's not represent it as some kind of opposite extreme of insanity from Portsmouth. Our strategy makes us less competitive in the Championship than you might reasonably think we could or even should be. How competitive has their strategy made them if they don't exist this time next week?

To continue the incontinent spewing about Madejski as though he's comparable in some inverted way to Gaydamak, Storrie, Chanrai, Andronikou, etc is really utterly daft. Can't you criticize the club's policy without splattering us all with your diarrhoea?


Can't you take reasonable arguments/criticisms that you happen not to like without becoming offensive?

Read my post again and please tell me where I say our situation is an opposite extreme from Portsmouth. The whole point of my post is that pointing to any extreme (be it Pompey or Chelsea) is daft. Therefore I fully agree with your post.

Apologies, 2ww. My post was directed at Royal Blue, who has contributed yet another piece of idiocy to this thread since with the following argument:

According to Andronikou, Portsmouth may not be going out of business; therefore, the Madejski approach to running a club is not so great after all.

User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: What are we here for?

by Svlad Cjelli » 23 Oct 2010 13:56

But surely the harder the commercial environment and the overall economic situation the more attention has to be paid to the financial side?

John Beech, a guru in understanding football finance, did a presentation recently that says the worst thing a club can for financial stability is to be promoted or relegated, and the higher in the pyramid that they do this the worse the effect is.

We've done both in quick succession, and at the highest level it's possible to do that - just at exactly the same time that there's a global recession and a slump in the property and publishing markets meaning JM's other businesses are under massive pressure and so he has precisely zero liquidity. and this whole situation was made much worse when SC was allowed to spend most of the 2 years' parachute payments in the first year in an all-or-nothing try to get back up (most un- "The Reading Way" there!)

Under those circumstances and such a "perfect storm" of bad timing, no wonder we've had an emphasis on the financial side. The fact that we're still in business, and in a shape where we're potential play-off contenders, is an absolute oxf*rd miracle!

238 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests

It is currently 08 Nov 2024 22:52